成人长期悲伤障碍的心理疗法:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Fengwei Hao , Fanghui Qiu , Zhide Liang , Pengda Li
{"title":"成人长期悲伤障碍的心理疗法:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Fengwei Hao ,&nbsp;Fanghui Qiu ,&nbsp;Zhide Liang ,&nbsp;Pengda Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), a condition characterized by severe, persistent, and disabling grief, is newly included in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for PGD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to synthesize the available evidence to compare five outcomes of different psychotherapies on PGD in adults and identify the optimal psychotherapy modality to inform clinical decision-making for the treatment of PGD.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A comprehensive search was conducted in 7 databases from inception until March 20th, 2023. In the frequentist framework, pairwise and network meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed for outcomes with 95 % confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2962 records found and 55 studies (1,0330 participants) assessing 11 different psychological interventions were included. Compared with the waiting list, behavioral therapy (SMD=-1.05; 95 %CI=-1.71, −0.38), third-wave cognitive behavior therapy (SMD=-1.00; 95 %CI =-1.41, −0.58), family therapy (SMD=-0.87; 95 %CI=-1.59, −0.16), psychodynamic therapy (SMD=-0.88; 95 %CI=-1.67, −0.10) and cognitive therapy (SMD=-0.84; 95 %CI=-1.57, −0.12) were statistically effective in reducing grief symptom. Only cognitive behavior therapy (OR =0.48; 95 %CI = 0.27, 0.85) was more acceptable than waiting list. In terms of secondary outcome, third-wave CBT can statistically significantly reduce depression (SMD= −0.60; 95 %CI =- 0.84, −0.36), PTSD (SMD=-0.99; 95 %CI =- 1.62, −0.36) and anxiety (SMD= −1.44; 95 %CI =-2.63, −0.25) respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most psychological interventions are effective, but only cognitive behavior therapy has the highest acceptability. Third-wave CBT with higher efficacy rates may be more beneficial for reducing secondary outcomes. To provide more robust evidence, high-quality trials should be conducted in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychotherapies for prolonged grief disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Fengwei Hao ,&nbsp;Fanghui Qiu ,&nbsp;Zhide Liang ,&nbsp;Pengda Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), a condition characterized by severe, persistent, and disabling grief, is newly included in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for PGD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to synthesize the available evidence to compare five outcomes of different psychotherapies on PGD in adults and identify the optimal psychotherapy modality to inform clinical decision-making for the treatment of PGD.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A comprehensive search was conducted in 7 databases from inception until March 20th, 2023. In the frequentist framework, pairwise and network meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed for outcomes with 95 % confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 2962 records found and 55 studies (1,0330 participants) assessing 11 different psychological interventions were included. Compared with the waiting list, behavioral therapy (SMD=-1.05; 95 %CI=-1.71, −0.38), third-wave cognitive behavior therapy (SMD=-1.00; 95 %CI =-1.41, −0.58), family therapy (SMD=-0.87; 95 %CI=-1.59, −0.16), psychodynamic therapy (SMD=-0.88; 95 %CI=-1.67, −0.10) and cognitive therapy (SMD=-0.84; 95 %CI=-1.57, −0.12) were statistically effective in reducing grief symptom. Only cognitive behavior therapy (OR =0.48; 95 %CI = 0.27, 0.85) was more acceptable than waiting list. In terms of secondary outcome, third-wave CBT can statistically significantly reduce depression (SMD= −0.60; 95 %CI =- 0.84, −0.36), PTSD (SMD=-0.99; 95 %CI =- 1.62, −0.36) and anxiety (SMD= −1.44; 95 %CI =-2.63, −0.25) respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most psychological interventions are effective, but only cognitive behavior therapy has the highest acceptability. Third-wave CBT with higher efficacy rates may be more beneficial for reducing secondary outcomes. To provide more robust evidence, high-quality trials should be conducted in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期悲伤障碍(PGD)是一种以严重、持续和致残性悲伤为特征的疾病,新近被纳入 ICD-11 和 DSM-5-TR。心理疗法是PGD最推荐的治疗方法之一,但哪些疗法应被视为一线治疗方法尚需明确。本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在综合现有证据,比较不同心理疗法对成人 PGD 的五种治疗结果,并确定最佳心理疗法模式,为治疗 PGD 的临床决策提供依据:方法:从开始到2023年3月20日,在7个数据库中进行了全面检索。在频数主义框架下,使用随机效应模型对结果进行配对分析和网络荟萃分析,并得出95%的置信区间(CI):结果:共找到 2962 条记录,55 项研究(10330 名参与者)评估了 11 种不同的心理干预措施。与等待名单相比,行为疗法(SMD=-1.05;95 %CI=-1.71, -0.38)、第三波认知行为疗法(SMD=-1.00;95 %CI=-1.41, -0.58)、家庭疗法(SMD=-0.87;95 %CI=-1.59,-0.16)、心理动力学疗法(SMD=-0.88;95 %CI=-1.67,-0.10)和认知疗法(SMD=-0.84;95 %CI=-1.57,-0.12)在统计学上对减少悲伤症状有效。只有认知行为疗法(OR=0.48;95%CI=0.27,0.85)比等待名单更容易被接受。在次要结果方面,第三波CBT在统计学上可分别显著减少抑郁(SMD=-0.60;95 %CI =- 0.84,-0.36)、创伤后应激障碍(SMD=-0.99;95 %CI =- 1.62,-0.36)和焦虑(SMD=-1.44;95 %CI =-2.63,-0.25):大多数心理干预措施都是有效的,但只有认知行为疗法的可接受性最高。结论:大多数心理干预措施都是有效的,但只有认知行为疗法的可接受性最高。疗效较高的第三波 CBT 可能更有利于减少次要结果。为了提供更有力的证据,今后应进行高质量的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychotherapies for prolonged grief disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Prolonged grief disorder (PGD), a condition characterized by severe, persistent, and disabling grief, is newly included in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for PGD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to synthesize the available evidence to compare five outcomes of different psychotherapies on PGD in adults and identify the optimal psychotherapy modality to inform clinical decision-making for the treatment of PGD.

Method

A comprehensive search was conducted in 7 databases from inception until March 20th, 2023. In the frequentist framework, pairwise and network meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed for outcomes with 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

There were 2962 records found and 55 studies (1,0330 participants) assessing 11 different psychological interventions were included. Compared with the waiting list, behavioral therapy (SMD=-1.05; 95 %CI=-1.71, −0.38), third-wave cognitive behavior therapy (SMD=-1.00; 95 %CI =-1.41, −0.58), family therapy (SMD=-0.87; 95 %CI=-1.59, −0.16), psychodynamic therapy (SMD=-0.88; 95 %CI=-1.67, −0.10) and cognitive therapy (SMD=-0.84; 95 %CI=-1.57, −0.12) were statistically effective in reducing grief symptom. Only cognitive behavior therapy (OR =0.48; 95 %CI = 0.27, 0.85) was more acceptable than waiting list. In terms of secondary outcome, third-wave CBT can statistically significantly reduce depression (SMD= −0.60; 95 %CI =- 0.84, −0.36), PTSD (SMD=-0.99; 95 %CI =- 1.62, −0.36) and anxiety (SMD= −1.44; 95 %CI =-2.63, −0.25) respectively.

Conclusions

Most psychological interventions are effective, but only cognitive behavior therapy has the highest acceptability. Third-wave CBT with higher efficacy rates may be more beneficial for reducing secondary outcomes. To provide more robust evidence, high-quality trials should be conducted in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信