绘制三个视角的原型方案

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Andy Hines, Heather Benoit, Lavonne Leong, Denise Worrell, Laura Schlehuber, Adam Cowart
{"title":"绘制三个视角的原型方案","authors":"Andy Hines,&nbsp;Heather Benoit,&nbsp;Lavonne Leong,&nbsp;Denise Worrell,&nbsp;Laura Schlehuber,&nbsp;Adam Cowart","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to suggest that mapping of archetype scenarios onto the three horizons could provide a useful starting point for understanding change in a domain. It was observed in practice that the combination of a scenario archetype technique and the Three Horizons framework seemed to generate a useful pattern in the relative importance of the archetype scenarios according to the time horizon. In short, a baseline archetype seemed to be most prevalent in Horizon 1, either a Collapse or New Equilibrium archetype in Horizon 2, and a Transformation in H3. To test this idea, 78 historical scenario sets conducive to the archetype technique were identified, and the proposed pattern was tested against the how the domains actually unfolded over time. The results indeed suggested some evidence for the pattern. They also raised a series of interesting research questions for the futures community going forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping archetype scenarios across the three horizons\",\"authors\":\"Andy Hines,&nbsp;Heather Benoit,&nbsp;Lavonne Leong,&nbsp;Denise Worrell,&nbsp;Laura Schlehuber,&nbsp;Adam Cowart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to suggest that mapping of archetype scenarios onto the three horizons could provide a useful starting point for understanding change in a domain. It was observed in practice that the combination of a scenario archetype technique and the Three Horizons framework seemed to generate a useful pattern in the relative importance of the archetype scenarios according to the time horizon. In short, a baseline archetype seemed to be most prevalent in Horizon 1, either a Collapse or New Equilibrium archetype in Horizon 2, and a Transformation in H3. To test this idea, 78 historical scenario sets conducive to the archetype technique were identified, and the proposed pattern was tested against the how the domains actually unfolded over time. The results indeed suggested some evidence for the pattern. They also raised a series of interesting research questions for the futures community going forward.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是建议将原型情景映射到三个地平线上,为理解某一领域的变化提供一个有用的起点。在实践中观察到,情景原型技术与三个地平线框架的结合似乎可以产生一种有用的模式,即根据时间跨度确定原型情景的相对重要性。简而言之,基线原型似乎在地平线 1 中最为普遍,崩溃或新平衡原型在地平线 2 中最为普遍,而转型原型在地平线 3 中最为普遍。为了验证这一观点,我们确定了 78 个有利于原型技术的历史情景集,并将所提出的模式与这些领域随着时间的推移实际展开的情况进行了对比测试。结果确实为该模式提供了一些证据。他们还为期货界今后的研究提出了一系列有趣的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping archetype scenarios across the three horizons

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that mapping of archetype scenarios onto the three horizons could provide a useful starting point for understanding change in a domain. It was observed in practice that the combination of a scenario archetype technique and the Three Horizons framework seemed to generate a useful pattern in the relative importance of the archetype scenarios according to the time horizon. In short, a baseline archetype seemed to be most prevalent in Horizon 1, either a Collapse or New Equilibrium archetype in Horizon 2, and a Transformation in H3. To test this idea, 78 historical scenario sets conducive to the archetype technique were identified, and the proposed pattern was tested against the how the domains actually unfolded over time. The results indeed suggested some evidence for the pattern. They also raised a series of interesting research questions for the futures community going forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信