特大城市去碳化:考虑城市间旅行和 15 分钟城市概念的时空分析

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Wangyang Chen , Ziyi Tan , Yaxin Wu , Filip Biljecki , Shunyi Liao , Qingya Zhou , Hongbao Li , Yuming Zheng , Feng Gao
{"title":"特大城市去碳化:考虑城市间旅行和 15 分钟城市概念的时空分析","authors":"Wangyang Chen ,&nbsp;Ziyi Tan ,&nbsp;Yaxin Wu ,&nbsp;Filip Biljecki ,&nbsp;Shunyi Liao ,&nbsp;Qingya Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongbao Li ,&nbsp;Yuming Zheng ,&nbsp;Feng Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Megacities are major contributors to global road CO2 emissions, highlighting their pivotal role in achieving low-carbon development. However, comprehensive studies on emission patterns and decarbonization strategies in these metropolitan areas remain limited. This study presents a novel and portable big data-based workflow for megacities to reveal their spatiotemporal dynamics of road CO2 emissions and quantify decarbonization potentials associated with inter-city travel and the 15-minute city concept. We take Guangzhou City (China) as a case study. Our results reveal that primary purpose trips produce 17 % more CO2 emissions than secondary trips on average. Inter-city trips account for 36.3 % of the total emissions in the city, and those for primary purposes exhibit closer spatial distributions with intra-city trips. While providing more 15-minute-walk POIs exhibits a marginally diminishing effect on reducing trip average emissions, comprehensive implementation of the 15-minute city concept in Guangzhou can reduce up to 56.3 % of the total emissions from non-home-related passenger trips, with variations observed across different trip purposes (40 %–70 %). A significant “head effect” of decarbonization potential across communities exists for all trip purposes. Our study highlights the environmental limitations of monocentric urban planning models in megacities and contributes valuable insights for crafting effective strategies for sustainable urban development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decarbonizing megacities: A spatiotemporal analysis considering inter-city travel and the 15-minute city concept\",\"authors\":\"Wangyang Chen ,&nbsp;Ziyi Tan ,&nbsp;Yaxin Wu ,&nbsp;Filip Biljecki ,&nbsp;Shunyi Liao ,&nbsp;Qingya Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongbao Li ,&nbsp;Yuming Zheng ,&nbsp;Feng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Megacities are major contributors to global road CO2 emissions, highlighting their pivotal role in achieving low-carbon development. However, comprehensive studies on emission patterns and decarbonization strategies in these metropolitan areas remain limited. This study presents a novel and portable big data-based workflow for megacities to reveal their spatiotemporal dynamics of road CO2 emissions and quantify decarbonization potentials associated with inter-city travel and the 15-minute city concept. We take Guangzhou City (China) as a case study. Our results reveal that primary purpose trips produce 17 % more CO2 emissions than secondary trips on average. Inter-city trips account for 36.3 % of the total emissions in the city, and those for primary purposes exhibit closer spatial distributions with intra-city trips. While providing more 15-minute-walk POIs exhibits a marginally diminishing effect on reducing trip average emissions, comprehensive implementation of the 15-minute city concept in Guangzhou can reduce up to 56.3 % of the total emissions from non-home-related passenger trips, with variations observed across different trip purposes (40 %–70 %). A significant “head effect” of decarbonization potential across communities exists for all trip purposes. Our study highlights the environmental limitations of monocentric urban planning models in megacities and contributes valuable insights for crafting effective strategies for sustainable urban development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124004669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124004669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特大城市是全球道路二氧化碳排放的主要贡献者,凸显了其在实现低碳发展中的关键作用。然而,对这些大都市地区的排放模式和去碳化战略的全面研究仍然有限。本研究针对特大城市提出了一种新颖、可移植的基于大数据的工作流程,以揭示其道路二氧化碳排放的时空动态,并量化与城际出行和 15 分钟城市概念相关的脱碳潜力。我们以广州市(中国)为案例进行研究。我们的研究结果表明,主要目的出行产生的二氧化碳排放量平均比次要目的出行多 17%。城市间出行占城市总排放量的 36.3%,主要目的出行与城市内出行在空间分布上更为接近。虽然提供更多步行 15 分钟的目的地对减少出行平均排放量的作用略有减弱,但在广州全面推行 15 分钟城市概念可减少高达 56.3% 的非家庭相关客运出行总排放量,不同出行目的的排放量也有差异(40%-70%)。在所有出行目的中,各社区的脱碳潜力都存在明显的 "头部效应"。我们的研究凸显了特大城市以单一中心的城市规划模式在环境方面的局限性,并为制定有效的城市可持续发展战略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decarbonizing megacities: A spatiotemporal analysis considering inter-city travel and the 15-minute city concept

Megacities are major contributors to global road CO2 emissions, highlighting their pivotal role in achieving low-carbon development. However, comprehensive studies on emission patterns and decarbonization strategies in these metropolitan areas remain limited. This study presents a novel and portable big data-based workflow for megacities to reveal their spatiotemporal dynamics of road CO2 emissions and quantify decarbonization potentials associated with inter-city travel and the 15-minute city concept. We take Guangzhou City (China) as a case study. Our results reveal that primary purpose trips produce 17 % more CO2 emissions than secondary trips on average. Inter-city trips account for 36.3 % of the total emissions in the city, and those for primary purposes exhibit closer spatial distributions with intra-city trips. While providing more 15-minute-walk POIs exhibits a marginally diminishing effect on reducing trip average emissions, comprehensive implementation of the 15-minute city concept in Guangzhou can reduce up to 56.3 % of the total emissions from non-home-related passenger trips, with variations observed across different trip purposes (40 %–70 %). A significant “head effect” of decarbonization potential across communities exists for all trip purposes. Our study highlights the environmental limitations of monocentric urban planning models in megacities and contributes valuable insights for crafting effective strategies for sustainable urban development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信