{"title":"太阳能冷却系统的热经济多目标优化","authors":"A. Barac , M. Živić , Z. Virag , M. Vujanović","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A solar cooling system that combines the organic Rankine cycle and vapour compression refrigeration cycle, sharing the same working fluid and condenser, was optimised in terms of the total investment cost and payback period. A comprehensive thermo-economic model includes the optimal sizing of compact heat exchangers according to manufacturer's recommendations. Among the four considered working fluids, the system using R152a exhibited the highest solar energy conversion efficiency of 5.66 %, significantly lower that of a photovoltaic system. By optimising the system to minimise the number of solar thermal collectors required to meet the energy demand for achieving a cooling power of 7.3 kW, the total investment cost and payback period amounted to 13,740 EUR and 30 years, respectively. Such a system is unprofitable without considering the utilisation of waste heat from the condenser. The main drawback of using a single fluid in considered solar cooling system is the conflict requirements for working fluids in the two cycles. The best choice of working fluid for one cycle is not favourable for other one. The working fluid must be chosen from a group of working fluids more suitable for vapour compression refrigeration cycle, which is an unfavourable selection for the organic Rankine cycle resulting in the reduced solar energy conversion efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermo-economic multi-objective optimisation of a solar cooling system\",\"authors\":\"A. Barac , M. Živić , Z. Virag , M. Vujanović\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A solar cooling system that combines the organic Rankine cycle and vapour compression refrigeration cycle, sharing the same working fluid and condenser, was optimised in terms of the total investment cost and payback period. A comprehensive thermo-economic model includes the optimal sizing of compact heat exchangers according to manufacturer's recommendations. Among the four considered working fluids, the system using R152a exhibited the highest solar energy conversion efficiency of 5.66 %, significantly lower that of a photovoltaic system. By optimising the system to minimise the number of solar thermal collectors required to meet the energy demand for achieving a cooling power of 7.3 kW, the total investment cost and payback period amounted to 13,740 EUR and 30 years, respectively. Such a system is unprofitable without considering the utilisation of waste heat from the condenser. The main drawback of using a single fluid in considered solar cooling system is the conflict requirements for working fluids in the two cycles. The best choice of working fluid for one cycle is not favourable for other one. The working fluid must be chosen from a group of working fluids more suitable for vapour compression refrigeration cycle, which is an unfavourable selection for the organic Rankine cycle resulting in the reduced solar energy conversion efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124003824\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124003824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thermo-economic multi-objective optimisation of a solar cooling system
A solar cooling system that combines the organic Rankine cycle and vapour compression refrigeration cycle, sharing the same working fluid and condenser, was optimised in terms of the total investment cost and payback period. A comprehensive thermo-economic model includes the optimal sizing of compact heat exchangers according to manufacturer's recommendations. Among the four considered working fluids, the system using R152a exhibited the highest solar energy conversion efficiency of 5.66 %, significantly lower that of a photovoltaic system. By optimising the system to minimise the number of solar thermal collectors required to meet the energy demand for achieving a cooling power of 7.3 kW, the total investment cost and payback period amounted to 13,740 EUR and 30 years, respectively. Such a system is unprofitable without considering the utilisation of waste heat from the condenser. The main drawback of using a single fluid in considered solar cooling system is the conflict requirements for working fluids in the two cycles. The best choice of working fluid for one cycle is not favourable for other one. The working fluid must be chosen from a group of working fluids more suitable for vapour compression refrigeration cycle, which is an unfavourable selection for the organic Rankine cycle resulting in the reduced solar energy conversion efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.