M.A. Ahulló-Fuster , M.L. Sánchez-Sánchez , M.A. Ruescas-Nicolau , M.I. Fuster-Ribera
{"title":"慢性中风患者的体育锻炼、障碍和益处：一项横断面调查研究\"[物理治疗。","authors":"M.A. Ahulló-Fuster , M.L. Sánchez-Sánchez , M.A. Ruescas-Nicolau , M.I. Fuster-Ribera","doi":"10.1016/j.ft.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Physical activity (PA) is essential for health. Post-stroke sequelae and other barriers may interfere with physical exercise (PE). Consequently, the perception of its benefits may vary. The aim of this study was to determine the level of PA as a function of the ambulation capacity and the degree of disability of individuals with chronic stroke, as well as the barriers and benefits perceived by them in the practice of PE.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey type study was carried out in a sample of people with chronic sequelae after stroke. The survey consisted of an activity diary, the SIS-16 scale, the IPAQ-E questionnaire, and the FAC and EBBS scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-four individuals participated (mean age 59.2±15.4 years), 51.4% of them showed low level of PA; particularly women (56.7%), those over 65 years of age (76.9%), those living in institutions (100%) and in rural areas (69.2%). Participants with a low degree of disability showed moderate (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76) and high (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5) PA levels, while in those with a higher degree of disability prevailed a low PA level (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51). There were significant differences between the dependent walking group (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0) and the independent walking group (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1110.500; U<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->108.500; p<0.001), with the former group presenting a low level of PA. The most common barriers were those related to fatigue and tiredness caused by PE. Participants recognized the benefits of PE for increasing strength and muscle tone, and improving flexibility, heart function and physical condition. No significant differences were found in terms of perceived barriers and benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most of the participants present a low PA level, prevailing in those with a higher degree of disability and dependent gait. They recognize the benefits of PE for the improvement of their cardiovascular system, muscle strength and physical condition. The lack of PE was justified by the fatigue and tiredness it causes.</p><p>The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p><p>DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.ft.2019.06.002</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34994,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia","volume":"46 4","pages":"Pages e1-e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211563824000622/pdfft?md5=769b47372e3600503604a4414bd39394&pid=1-s2.0-S0211563824000622-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrigendum to ‘Actividad física, barreras y beneficios en personas con ictus crónico: estudio transversal de encuesta’ [Fisioterapia. 2019;41(5):275-284]\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Ahulló-Fuster , M.L. Sánchez-Sánchez , M.A. Ruescas-Nicolau , M.I. Fuster-Ribera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ft.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Physical activity (PA) is essential for health. Post-stroke sequelae and other barriers may interfere with physical exercise (PE). Consequently, the perception of its benefits may vary. The aim of this study was to determine the level of PA as a function of the ambulation capacity and the degree of disability of individuals with chronic stroke, as well as the barriers and benefits perceived by them in the practice of PE.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey type study was carried out in a sample of people with chronic sequelae after stroke. The survey consisted of an activity diary, the SIS-16 scale, the IPAQ-E questionnaire, and the FAC and EBBS scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-four individuals participated (mean age 59.2±15.4 years), 51.4% of them showed low level of PA; particularly women (56.7%), those over 65 years of age (76.9%), those living in institutions (100%) and in rural areas (69.2%). Participants with a low degree of disability showed moderate (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76) and high (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5) PA levels, while in those with a higher degree of disability prevailed a low PA level (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51). There were significant differences between the dependent walking group (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0) and the independent walking group (Mdn<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1110.500; U<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->108.500; p<0.001), with the former group presenting a low level of PA. The most common barriers were those related to fatigue and tiredness caused by PE. Participants recognized the benefits of PE for increasing strength and muscle tone, and improving flexibility, heart function and physical condition. No significant differences were found in terms of perceived barriers and benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most of the participants present a low PA level, prevailing in those with a higher degree of disability and dependent gait. They recognize the benefits of PE for the improvement of their cardiovascular system, muscle strength and physical condition. The lack of PE was justified by the fatigue and tiredness it causes.</p><p>The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p><p>DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.ft.2019.06.002</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisioterapia\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e1-e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211563824000622/pdfft?md5=769b47372e3600503604a4414bd39394&pid=1-s2.0-S0211563824000622-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211563824000622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211563824000622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corrigendum to ‘Actividad física, barreras y beneficios en personas con ictus crónico: estudio transversal de encuesta’ [Fisioterapia. 2019;41(5):275-284]
Introduction
Physical activity (PA) is essential for health. Post-stroke sequelae and other barriers may interfere with physical exercise (PE). Consequently, the perception of its benefits may vary. The aim of this study was to determine the level of PA as a function of the ambulation capacity and the degree of disability of individuals with chronic stroke, as well as the barriers and benefits perceived by them in the practice of PE.
Material and Methods
A cross-sectional survey type study was carried out in a sample of people with chronic sequelae after stroke. The survey consisted of an activity diary, the SIS-16 scale, the IPAQ-E questionnaire, and the FAC and EBBS scales.
Results
Seventy-four individuals participated (mean age 59.2±15.4 years), 51.4% of them showed low level of PA; particularly women (56.7%), those over 65 years of age (76.9%), those living in institutions (100%) and in rural areas (69.2%). Participants with a low degree of disability showed moderate (Mdn = 76) and high (Mdn = 87.5) PA levels, while in those with a higher degree of disability prevailed a low PA level (Mdn = 51). There were significant differences between the dependent walking group (Mdn = 0) and the independent walking group (Mdn = 1110.500; U = 108.500; p<0.001), with the former group presenting a low level of PA. The most common barriers were those related to fatigue and tiredness caused by PE. Participants recognized the benefits of PE for increasing strength and muscle tone, and improving flexibility, heart function and physical condition. No significant differences were found in terms of perceived barriers and benefits.
Conclusion
Most of the participants present a low PA level, prevailing in those with a higher degree of disability and dependent gait. They recognize the benefits of PE for the improvement of their cardiovascular system, muscle strength and physical condition. The lack of PE was justified by the fatigue and tiredness it causes.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
FisioterapiaHealth Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍：
Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Fisioterapeutas. Sus páginas ofrecen desde artículos originales hasta revisiones, pasando por el estudio de casos o los actos más importantes relacionados con la especialidad.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
