超越元研究:从关于基于自然的解决方案的非物质利益的大型多站点原始数据集中汲取的经验教训

Martina Viti , Jacob Ladenburg , Roland Löwe , Hjalte J.D. Sørup , Ursula S. McKnight , Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
{"title":"超越元研究:从关于基于自然的解决方案的非物质利益的大型多站点原始数据集中汲取的经验教训","authors":"Martina Viti ,&nbsp;Jacob Ladenburg ,&nbsp;Roland Löwe ,&nbsp;Hjalte J.D. Sørup ,&nbsp;Ursula S. McKnight ,&nbsp;Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are growing in popularity as approaches for, among others, the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. However, their uptake is still slow despite the recognition of their role in enabling a smarter, more systemic, and faster adaptation to climate change. Uncertainties regarding the valuation and subsequent economic feasibility of NBS are deemed to be a substantial barrier to their uptake. The monetary valuation of the non-tangible benefits of NBS (e.g., increased recreation and enhanced biodiversity) is seen as a plausible strategy to get closer to providing a holistic assessment. However, the quantification of these non-tangible benefits is often not integrated into economic assessments of NBS, partly as methods that can be replicated across sites have been lacking. This situation risks leading to inconsistent and/or biased valuations, which may negatively influence or delay the prioritization of NBS. Thus, our study aims to collect primary data on the non-tangible benefits of NBS across different European study sites and to identify patterns in how the different types and contexts of NBS influence people's valuation. We applied a contingent valuation survey to six different peri‑urban NBS study sites, where the focus is on the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. The target of the survey was the general public, and we used willingness-to-pay questions to quantify the value given by the respondents to the NBS. Our results highlighted that people value the multiple benefits of NBS, and positively react to implementations improving nature across all sites. Moreover, similar variables seem to influence the value attributed to NBS across sites, with income and personal preferences ranking highly among them. These insights indicate that decision-makers and NBS-planners can learn more broadly from past experiences from a variety of (cultural) contexts, which can assist in delivering more targeted and multi-functional NBS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000375/pdfft?md5=a7e5344d879a878c8a7c78e0c1e7422b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000375-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond meta-studies: Learnings from a large multi-site primary dataset on non-tangible benefits of nature-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"Martina Viti ,&nbsp;Jacob Ladenburg ,&nbsp;Roland Löwe ,&nbsp;Hjalte J.D. Sørup ,&nbsp;Ursula S. McKnight ,&nbsp;Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are growing in popularity as approaches for, among others, the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. However, their uptake is still slow despite the recognition of their role in enabling a smarter, more systemic, and faster adaptation to climate change. Uncertainties regarding the valuation and subsequent economic feasibility of NBS are deemed to be a substantial barrier to their uptake. The monetary valuation of the non-tangible benefits of NBS (e.g., increased recreation and enhanced biodiversity) is seen as a plausible strategy to get closer to providing a holistic assessment. However, the quantification of these non-tangible benefits is often not integrated into economic assessments of NBS, partly as methods that can be replicated across sites have been lacking. This situation risks leading to inconsistent and/or biased valuations, which may negatively influence or delay the prioritization of NBS. Thus, our study aims to collect primary data on the non-tangible benefits of NBS across different European study sites and to identify patterns in how the different types and contexts of NBS influence people's valuation. We applied a contingent valuation survey to six different peri‑urban NBS study sites, where the focus is on the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. The target of the survey was the general public, and we used willingness-to-pay questions to quantify the value given by the respondents to the NBS. Our results highlighted that people value the multiple benefits of NBS, and positively react to implementations improving nature across all sites. Moreover, similar variables seem to influence the value attributed to NBS across sites, with income and personal preferences ranking highly among them. These insights indicate that decision-makers and NBS-planners can learn more broadly from past experiences from a variety of (cultural) contexts, which can assist in delivering more targeted and multi-functional NBS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000375/pdfft?md5=a7e5344d879a878c8a7c78e0c1e7422b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772411524000375-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以自然为基础的解决方案(NBS)作为降低水文气象风险等方面的方法,越来越受到人们的欢迎。然而,尽管人们认识到它们在实现更智能、更系统、更快地适应气候变化方面的作用,但对它们的吸收仍然缓慢。人们认为,非物质基 础设施的估价和随后的经济可行性方面存在的不确定性是其推广应用的主要障碍。对非物质基 础设施的非物质利益(如增加娱乐性和提高生物多样性)进行货币估值被视为一种可行的战略,以 便更接近于提供整体评估。然而,这些非有形效益的量化往往没有纳入非核心预算系统的经济评估,部分原因是缺乏可在不同地点复制的方法。这种情况有可能导致评估结果不一致和/或有偏差,从而对确定非营利性战略的优先次序产生负面影响或造成延误。因此,我们的研究旨在收集欧洲不同研究地点非物质文化遗产非物质利益的原始数据,并确定不同类型和背景的非物质文化遗产如何影响人们的估价。我们在六个不同的城市周边非物质文化遗产研究地点进行了一次或然估价调查,重点是降低水文气象风险。调查对象是普通公众,我们使用了支付意愿问题来量化受访者对国家统计局的评价。我们的调查结果表明,人们重视国家监测系统的多重益处,并对在所有地点实施改善自然环境的措施做出积极反应。此外,类似的变量似乎也影响着不同地点的国家生物多样性战略价值,其中收入和个人偏好在这些变量中排名靠前。这些见解表明,决策者和国家生物多样性战略的规划者可以从各种(文化)背景下的以往经验中吸取更广泛的教训,这有助于提供更有针对性和多功能的国家生物多样性战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond meta-studies: Learnings from a large multi-site primary dataset on non-tangible benefits of nature-based solutions

Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are growing in popularity as approaches for, among others, the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. However, their uptake is still slow despite the recognition of their role in enabling a smarter, more systemic, and faster adaptation to climate change. Uncertainties regarding the valuation and subsequent economic feasibility of NBS are deemed to be a substantial barrier to their uptake. The monetary valuation of the non-tangible benefits of NBS (e.g., increased recreation and enhanced biodiversity) is seen as a plausible strategy to get closer to providing a holistic assessment. However, the quantification of these non-tangible benefits is often not integrated into economic assessments of NBS, partly as methods that can be replicated across sites have been lacking. This situation risks leading to inconsistent and/or biased valuations, which may negatively influence or delay the prioritization of NBS. Thus, our study aims to collect primary data on the non-tangible benefits of NBS across different European study sites and to identify patterns in how the different types and contexts of NBS influence people's valuation. We applied a contingent valuation survey to six different peri‑urban NBS study sites, where the focus is on the reduction of hydro-meteorological risks. The target of the survey was the general public, and we used willingness-to-pay questions to quantify the value given by the respondents to the NBS. Our results highlighted that people value the multiple benefits of NBS, and positively react to implementations improving nature across all sites. Moreover, similar variables seem to influence the value attributed to NBS across sites, with income and personal preferences ranking highly among them. These insights indicate that decision-makers and NBS-planners can learn more broadly from past experiences from a variety of (cultural) contexts, which can assist in delivering more targeted and multi-functional NBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信