噪音信号:评级波动是否取决于消费跨度的长短?

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
David Boto-García , Veronica Leoni
{"title":"噪音信号:评级波动是否取决于消费跨度的长短?","authors":"David Boto-García ,&nbsp;Veronica Leoni","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the informational content of online reviews. Unlike other studies that have explored the drivers of average rating scores, we examine the factors explaining the variance in individual ratings for the same goods. In particular, we focus on how the length of stay at a hotel, as a measure of consumption span, influences the variance of rating scores. We conduct an empirical analysis using approximately 522,000 individual hotel reviews on Booking.com from five major European cities. Results indicate that the volatility of individual ratings decreases with stay duration, implying that online ratings from short-stayers (short consumption episodes) are noisy signals of the underlying hotel quality. We also present preliminary evidence that greater volatility negatively correlates with perceived usefulness by subsequent consumers. Our findings offer relevant insights for platform design operators about the drivers of rating volatility and how it affects social learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 106817"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noisy signals: Does rating volatility depend on the length of the consumption span?\",\"authors\":\"David Boto-García ,&nbsp;Veronica Leoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the informational content of online reviews. Unlike other studies that have explored the drivers of average rating scores, we examine the factors explaining the variance in individual ratings for the same goods. In particular, we focus on how the length of stay at a hotel, as a measure of consumption span, influences the variance of rating scores. We conduct an empirical analysis using approximately 522,000 individual hotel reviews on Booking.com from five major European cities. Results indicate that the volatility of individual ratings decreases with stay duration, implying that online ratings from short-stayers (short consumption episodes) are noisy signals of the underlying hotel quality. We also present preliminary evidence that greater volatility negatively correlates with perceived usefulness by subsequent consumers. Our findings offer relevant insights for platform design operators about the drivers of rating volatility and how it affects social learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324001743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324001743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了在线评论的信息内容。与其他探讨平均评分驱动因素的研究不同,我们研究的是同一商品单个评分差异的解释因素。特别是,作为消费跨度的衡量标准,我们重点研究了酒店入住时间是如何影响评分差异的。我们使用 Booking.com 上来自欧洲五大城市的约 522,000 条酒店评论进行了实证分析。结果表明,个人评分的波动性随着入住时间的延长而减小,这意味着短期入住者(短期消费)的在线评分是酒店质量的噪声信号。我们还提出了初步证据,表明波动性越大,后续消费者感知到的有用性就越低。我们的研究结果为平台设计运营商提供了有关评级波动性驱动因素及其如何影响社会学习的相关见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noisy signals: Does rating volatility depend on the length of the consumption span?

This study investigates the informational content of online reviews. Unlike other studies that have explored the drivers of average rating scores, we examine the factors explaining the variance in individual ratings for the same goods. In particular, we focus on how the length of stay at a hotel, as a measure of consumption span, influences the variance of rating scores. We conduct an empirical analysis using approximately 522,000 individual hotel reviews on Booking.com from five major European cities. Results indicate that the volatility of individual ratings decreases with stay duration, implying that online ratings from short-stayers (short consumption episodes) are noisy signals of the underlying hotel quality. We also present preliminary evidence that greater volatility negatively correlates with perceived usefulness by subsequent consumers. Our findings offer relevant insights for platform design operators about the drivers of rating volatility and how it affects social learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信