{"title":"小剂量阿托品治疗高度近视:一项观察性队列研究","authors":"Anna Mueller , Roberto Warman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe and compare the spherical equivalent progression of pediatric patients with high myopia undergoing treatment with 0.01 % atropine and those not receiving any myopia therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, descriptive cohort study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this IRB-approved study, we analyzed the spherical equivalent (SE) progression in children 6–13 years old treated with 0.01 % atropine and those who were not treated for myopia, initial SE of ≤-6 D, astigmatism of ≤2 D, no syndromic conditions, and records of cycloplegic refraction measurements without missing more than one year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-five eyes were included, with 87 % belonging to Hispanic patients. The baseline SE (D) was -7.66 ± 1.40 in the atropine group and -7.90 ± 1.38 in the control group. Over three years, atropine-treated eyes demonstrated slower SE progression compared to controls (<em>P</em> = 0.002). Analysis of yearly progression rates (D/year) revealed notably slower progression in the atropine group during the second (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and third (<em>P</em> = 0.02) years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that low-dose atropine may be beneficial as a first-line treatment for high myopia due to its favorable safety profile and potential efficacy. Due to limited statistical power, findings should be interpreted cautiously.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467/pdfft?md5=5f7709c3e439015737541be0912f71f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-dose atropine for high myopia: An observational cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Mueller , Roberto Warman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe and compare the spherical equivalent progression of pediatric patients with high myopia undergoing treatment with 0.01 % atropine and those not receiving any myopia therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, descriptive cohort study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this IRB-approved study, we analyzed the spherical equivalent (SE) progression in children 6–13 years old treated with 0.01 % atropine and those who were not treated for myopia, initial SE of ≤-6 D, astigmatism of ≤2 D, no syndromic conditions, and records of cycloplegic refraction measurements without missing more than one year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-five eyes were included, with 87 % belonging to Hispanic patients. The baseline SE (D) was -7.66 ± 1.40 in the atropine group and -7.90 ± 1.38 in the control group. Over three years, atropine-treated eyes demonstrated slower SE progression compared to controls (<em>P</em> = 0.002). Analysis of yearly progression rates (D/year) revealed notably slower progression in the atropine group during the second (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and third (<em>P</em> = 0.02) years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that low-dose atropine may be beneficial as a first-line treatment for high myopia due to its favorable safety profile and potential efficacy. Due to limited statistical power, findings should be interpreted cautiously.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467/pdfft?md5=5f7709c3e439015737541be0912f71f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-dose atropine for high myopia: An observational cohort study
Purpose
To describe and compare the spherical equivalent progression of pediatric patients with high myopia undergoing treatment with 0.01 % atropine and those not receiving any myopia therapy.
Design
Retrospective, descriptive cohort study
Methods
In this IRB-approved study, we analyzed the spherical equivalent (SE) progression in children 6–13 years old treated with 0.01 % atropine and those who were not treated for myopia, initial SE of ≤-6 D, astigmatism of ≤2 D, no syndromic conditions, and records of cycloplegic refraction measurements without missing more than one year.
Results
Seventy-five eyes were included, with 87 % belonging to Hispanic patients. The baseline SE (D) was -7.66 ± 1.40 in the atropine group and -7.90 ± 1.38 in the control group. Over three years, atropine-treated eyes demonstrated slower SE progression compared to controls (P = 0.002). Analysis of yearly progression rates (D/year) revealed notably slower progression in the atropine group during the second (P = 0.04) and third (P = 0.02) years.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that low-dose atropine may be beneficial as a first-line treatment for high myopia due to its favorable safety profile and potential efficacy. Due to limited statistical power, findings should be interpreted cautiously.