国家间能源转型合作网络分析

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Toyo Kawabata
{"title":"国家间能源转型合作网络分析","authors":"Toyo Kawabata","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy transition is leading to a fundamental shift in interstate energy relationships as renewables, hydrogen, critical minerals and other technologies are being increasingly deployed worldwide, intertwined with climate change concern. Evolving bilateral and multilateral cooperation agreements on energy transition signals that the interstate energy relationship is forming differently compared to the fossil fuel-based energy relationships of the previous century. To understand the current landscape of international energy transition cooperation, the paper applied social network analysis to identify the clustering of cooperation between 176 countries and political bodies in energy transition, including renewables, hydrogen and critical minerals, nuclear energy, carbon capture, utilization and storage, and natural gas, by analysing 293 bilateral and multilateral energy cooperation arrangements. Overall, the countries having initiated bilateral cooperation programme, such as China, Japan, and Germany, have an expanded network with other countries under their respective bilateral scheme. It is also observed that both traditional energy exporters and importers are actively forming networks since both explore emerging opportunities driven by energy transition while their motivation may not be identical. Traditional energy exporters attempt to diversify their energy products' portfolio in consideration of the international pressure on decarbonization, whereas traditional energy importers seek opportunities to become an exporter or to secure a supply chain as consumers. For renewables, while China has the highest centrality regarding overall and renewable-specific cooperation, the European Union and United States consistently form clusters in each area of cooperation. With regard to hydrogen and critical minerals, the expected consumer countries are proactively connecting with other countries to secure a sustainable supply chain. It is also found that the European Union and the United States plus Japan tend to create not only bilateral but also multilateral cooperation through alliances and partnerships, making their clustering more solid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network analysis on energy transition cooperation between countries\",\"authors\":\"Toyo Kawabata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Energy transition is leading to a fundamental shift in interstate energy relationships as renewables, hydrogen, critical minerals and other technologies are being increasingly deployed worldwide, intertwined with climate change concern. Evolving bilateral and multilateral cooperation agreements on energy transition signals that the interstate energy relationship is forming differently compared to the fossil fuel-based energy relationships of the previous century. To understand the current landscape of international energy transition cooperation, the paper applied social network analysis to identify the clustering of cooperation between 176 countries and political bodies in energy transition, including renewables, hydrogen and critical minerals, nuclear energy, carbon capture, utilization and storage, and natural gas, by analysing 293 bilateral and multilateral energy cooperation arrangements. Overall, the countries having initiated bilateral cooperation programme, such as China, Japan, and Germany, have an expanded network with other countries under their respective bilateral scheme. It is also observed that both traditional energy exporters and importers are actively forming networks since both explore emerging opportunities driven by energy transition while their motivation may not be identical. Traditional energy exporters attempt to diversify their energy products' portfolio in consideration of the international pressure on decarbonization, whereas traditional energy importers seek opportunities to become an exporter or to secure a supply chain as consumers. For renewables, while China has the highest centrality regarding overall and renewable-specific cooperation, the European Union and United States consistently form clusters in each area of cooperation. With regard to hydrogen and critical minerals, the expected consumer countries are proactively connecting with other countries to secure a sustainable supply chain. It is also found that the European Union and the United States plus Japan tend to create not only bilateral but also multilateral cooperation through alliances and partnerships, making their clustering more solid.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着可再生能源、氢、关键矿产和其他技术在全球范围内的应用日益增多,能源转型正在导致国家间能源关系发生根本性转变,这与气候变化问题相互交织。能源转型双边和多边合作协议的不断发展表明,与上个世纪以化石燃料为基础的能源关系相比,国家间能源关系的形成方式正在发生变化。为了解当前国际能源转型合作的格局,本文运用社会网络分析法,通过分析 293 项双边和多边能源合作安排,确定了 176 个国家和政治机构在能源转型方面的合作集群,包括可再生能源、氢和关键矿物、核能、碳捕获、利用和储存以及天然气。总体而言,已启动双边合作计划的国家,如中国、日本和德国,在各自的双边计划下与其他国家的合作网络不断扩大。我们还注意到,传统能源出口国和进口国都在积极组建网络,因为它们都在探索能源转型带来的新兴机遇,但其动机可能并不完全相同。传统能源出口国考虑到去碳化的国际压力,试图使其能源产品组合多样化,而传统能源进口国则寻求成为出口国或作为消费者确保供应链的机会。就可再生能源而言,虽然中国在总体合作和可再生能源具体合作方面的中心地位最高,但欧盟和美国在每个合作领域始终形成集群。在氢和关键矿物方面,预期消费国正积极与其他国家建立联系,以确保可持续的供应链。研究还发现,欧盟、美国和日本不仅倾向于通过联盟和伙伴关系开展双边合作,还倾向于开展多边合作,从而使其集群更加稳固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network analysis on energy transition cooperation between countries

Energy transition is leading to a fundamental shift in interstate energy relationships as renewables, hydrogen, critical minerals and other technologies are being increasingly deployed worldwide, intertwined with climate change concern. Evolving bilateral and multilateral cooperation agreements on energy transition signals that the interstate energy relationship is forming differently compared to the fossil fuel-based energy relationships of the previous century. To understand the current landscape of international energy transition cooperation, the paper applied social network analysis to identify the clustering of cooperation between 176 countries and political bodies in energy transition, including renewables, hydrogen and critical minerals, nuclear energy, carbon capture, utilization and storage, and natural gas, by analysing 293 bilateral and multilateral energy cooperation arrangements. Overall, the countries having initiated bilateral cooperation programme, such as China, Japan, and Germany, have an expanded network with other countries under their respective bilateral scheme. It is also observed that both traditional energy exporters and importers are actively forming networks since both explore emerging opportunities driven by energy transition while their motivation may not be identical. Traditional energy exporters attempt to diversify their energy products' portfolio in consideration of the international pressure on decarbonization, whereas traditional energy importers seek opportunities to become an exporter or to secure a supply chain as consumers. For renewables, while China has the highest centrality regarding overall and renewable-specific cooperation, the European Union and United States consistently form clusters in each area of cooperation. With regard to hydrogen and critical minerals, the expected consumer countries are proactively connecting with other countries to secure a sustainable supply chain. It is also found that the European Union and the United States plus Japan tend to create not only bilateral but also multilateral cooperation through alliances and partnerships, making their clustering more solid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信