太阳能难题:关于太阳能跨学科研究中的不稳定性和实践性

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ryan Stock , Siddharth Sareen
{"title":"太阳能难题:关于太阳能跨学科研究中的不稳定性和实践性","authors":"Ryan Stock ,&nbsp;Siddharth Sareen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solar power is uniquely effective at mitigating the climate crisis and is becoming the cheapest form of energy globally. However, the proliferation of solar power has been uneven and inequitable. For example, large-scale solar infrastructures are awash with globalized financial capital, often developed through the gendered and racialized alienation of land and livelihoods of local marginalized populations. The imperative to mitigate the climate crisis within this consequential decade sadly supersedes equity considerations, inspiring many solar scholars to scream for solar justice. We posit that solar development is an <em>aporia</em>, a perplexing prefigured yet performed impasse against sustainability and equity that anticipates urgent implementation while requiring patient interrogation. In this synthesis overview, we examine the state of social science research on solar power to illuminate critically constructive scholarly inquiry, foster emancipatory praxis, and generate provocations for future research. The articles in this collection explore the aporias of solar photovoltaic development in the global North and global South from heterogeneous scholarly fields, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks and case studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solar aporias: On precarity and praxis in interdisciplinary research on solar energy\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Stock ,&nbsp;Siddharth Sareen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Solar power is uniquely effective at mitigating the climate crisis and is becoming the cheapest form of energy globally. However, the proliferation of solar power has been uneven and inequitable. For example, large-scale solar infrastructures are awash with globalized financial capital, often developed through the gendered and racialized alienation of land and livelihoods of local marginalized populations. The imperative to mitigate the climate crisis within this consequential decade sadly supersedes equity considerations, inspiring many solar scholars to scream for solar justice. We posit that solar development is an <em>aporia</em>, a perplexing prefigured yet performed impasse against sustainability and equity that anticipates urgent implementation while requiring patient interrogation. In this synthesis overview, we examine the state of social science research on solar power to illuminate critically constructive scholarly inquiry, foster emancipatory praxis, and generate provocations for future research. The articles in this collection explore the aporias of solar photovoltaic development in the global North and global South from heterogeneous scholarly fields, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks and case studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002524\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳能发电在缓解气候危机方面具有独特的功效,并且正在成为全球最廉价的能源形式。然而,太阳能的普及是不均衡和不公平的。例如,大规模太阳能基础设施充斥着全球化的金融资本,而这些资本往往是通过对当地边缘化人口的土地和生计进行性别化和种族化的异化而发展起来的。可悲的是,在这重要的十年里,缓解气候危机的当务之急压倒了对公平的考虑,这激发了许多太阳能学者对太阳能正义的呐喊。我们认为,太阳能发展是一个缺憾,是一个令人困惑的预示,但又是一个与可持续性和公平相悖的僵局。在这篇综述中,我们审视了太阳能社会科学研究的现状,以揭示具有批判性和建设性的学术探索,促进解放实践,并为未来研究提出建议。本文集中的文章从不同的学术领域、方法论途径、理论框架和案例研究中探讨了全球北方和全球南方太阳能光伏发展的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solar aporias: On precarity and praxis in interdisciplinary research on solar energy

Solar power is uniquely effective at mitigating the climate crisis and is becoming the cheapest form of energy globally. However, the proliferation of solar power has been uneven and inequitable. For example, large-scale solar infrastructures are awash with globalized financial capital, often developed through the gendered and racialized alienation of land and livelihoods of local marginalized populations. The imperative to mitigate the climate crisis within this consequential decade sadly supersedes equity considerations, inspiring many solar scholars to scream for solar justice. We posit that solar development is an aporia, a perplexing prefigured yet performed impasse against sustainability and equity that anticipates urgent implementation while requiring patient interrogation. In this synthesis overview, we examine the state of social science research on solar power to illuminate critically constructive scholarly inquiry, foster emancipatory praxis, and generate provocations for future research. The articles in this collection explore the aporias of solar photovoltaic development in the global North and global South from heterogeneous scholarly fields, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks and case studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信