Ruth Woods, Sara Heidenreich, Marius Korsnes, Gisle Solbu
{"title":"能效政策加剧了能源不公:挪威低收入家庭关爱能源的做法","authors":"Ruth Woods, Sara Heidenreich, Marius Korsnes, Gisle Solbu","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The high energy prices in Europe have caused an increase in energy poverty, even in Norway, where electricity has traditionally been affordable due to cheap hydropower. In this paper, we analyse the impact of energy-efficiency policies on low-income households to discover whether they reduce or reinforce existing injustices. To address this, our approach combines energy justice with a theory of care. Little attention has been paid to care within the context of energy, although it has been widely used to understand how and why we carry out everyday practices. The paper is based on a qualitative interview study with low-income households from three Norwegian cities. Participants were asked about their concerns and challenges regarding the housing and energy sectors as well as the potential solutions they imagined. We found that policy that is intended to encourage household investments in energy-efficient solutions is amplifying experiences of social inequality among low-income households. Moreover, the lack of connections between energy-efficiency policies and social-housing policy often results in unaddressed housing injustices. Furthermore, we discovered that caring practices played a dual role when addressing energy-related issues. On the one hand, practicing care was crucial in helping low-income households develop appropriate solutions to their everyday challenges. On the other hand, by resolving their immediate concerns through practicing care, they inadvertently concealed energy injustices from wider society. Based on this, we argue that caring energy efficiency practices should be made visible and acknowledged in energy policy discourses. We see this as crucial to enable a just energy transition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002548/pdfft?md5=b84207a664f92272364de18513ce835f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002548-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy-efficiency policies reinforce energy injustices: The caring energy practices of low-income households in Norway\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Woods, Sara Heidenreich, Marius Korsnes, Gisle Solbu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The high energy prices in Europe have caused an increase in energy poverty, even in Norway, where electricity has traditionally been affordable due to cheap hydropower. In this paper, we analyse the impact of energy-efficiency policies on low-income households to discover whether they reduce or reinforce existing injustices. To address this, our approach combines energy justice with a theory of care. Little attention has been paid to care within the context of energy, although it has been widely used to understand how and why we carry out everyday practices. The paper is based on a qualitative interview study with low-income households from three Norwegian cities. Participants were asked about their concerns and challenges regarding the housing and energy sectors as well as the potential solutions they imagined. We found that policy that is intended to encourage household investments in energy-efficient solutions is amplifying experiences of social inequality among low-income households. Moreover, the lack of connections between energy-efficiency policies and social-housing policy often results in unaddressed housing injustices. Furthermore, we discovered that caring practices played a dual role when addressing energy-related issues. On the one hand, practicing care was crucial in helping low-income households develop appropriate solutions to their everyday challenges. On the other hand, by resolving their immediate concerns through practicing care, they inadvertently concealed energy injustices from wider society. Based on this, we argue that caring energy efficiency practices should be made visible and acknowledged in energy policy discourses. We see this as crucial to enable a just energy transition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002548/pdfft?md5=b84207a664f92272364de18513ce835f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002548-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy-efficiency policies reinforce energy injustices: The caring energy practices of low-income households in Norway
The high energy prices in Europe have caused an increase in energy poverty, even in Norway, where electricity has traditionally been affordable due to cheap hydropower. In this paper, we analyse the impact of energy-efficiency policies on low-income households to discover whether they reduce or reinforce existing injustices. To address this, our approach combines energy justice with a theory of care. Little attention has been paid to care within the context of energy, although it has been widely used to understand how and why we carry out everyday practices. The paper is based on a qualitative interview study with low-income households from three Norwegian cities. Participants were asked about their concerns and challenges regarding the housing and energy sectors as well as the potential solutions they imagined. We found that policy that is intended to encourage household investments in energy-efficient solutions is amplifying experiences of social inequality among low-income households. Moreover, the lack of connections between energy-efficiency policies and social-housing policy often results in unaddressed housing injustices. Furthermore, we discovered that caring practices played a dual role when addressing energy-related issues. On the one hand, practicing care was crucial in helping low-income households develop appropriate solutions to their everyday challenges. On the other hand, by resolving their immediate concerns through practicing care, they inadvertently concealed energy injustices from wider society. Based on this, we argue that caring energy efficiency practices should be made visible and acknowledged in energy policy discourses. We see this as crucial to enable a just energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.