Vijay M Ravindra, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Hailey Jensen, William E Whitehead, Abhaya V Kulkarni, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons, Robert P Naftel, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Ian F Pollack, Michael M McDowell, Mandeep S Tamber, Jason S Hauptman, Samuel R Browd, Jonathan Pindrik, Albert M Isaacs, Patrick J McDonald, Todd C Hankinson, Eric M Jackson, Jason Chu, Mark D Krieger, Tamara D Simon, Jennifer M Strahle, Richard Holubkov, Ron Reeder, John R W Kestle
{"title":"比较小儿脑积水的脑室-心房分流术和脑室-脑室分流术:脑积水临床研究网络研究。","authors":"Vijay M Ravindra, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Hailey Jensen, William E Whitehead, Abhaya V Kulkarni, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons, Robert P Naftel, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Ian F Pollack, Michael M McDowell, Mandeep S Tamber, Jason S Hauptman, Samuel R Browd, Jonathan Pindrik, Albert M Isaacs, Patrick J McDonald, Todd C Hankinson, Eric M Jackson, Jason Chu, Mark D Krieger, Tamara D Simon, Jennifer M Strahle, Richard Holubkov, Ron Reeder, John R W Kestle","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When the peritoneal cavity cannot serve as the distal shunt terminus, nonperitoneal shunts, typically terminating in the atrium or pleural space, are used. The comparative effectiveness of these two terminus options has not been evaluated. The authors directly compared shunt survival and complication rates for ventriculoatrial (VA) and ventriculopleural (VPl) shunts in a pediatric cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Core Data Project was used to identify children ≤ 18 years of age who underwent either VA or VPl shunt insertion. The primary outcome was time to shunt failure. Secondary outcomes included distal site complications and frequency of shunt failure at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search criteria yielded 416 children from 14 centers with either a VA (n = 318) or VPl (n = 98) shunt, including those converted from ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Children with VA shunts had a lower median age at insertion (6.1 years vs 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Among those children with VA shunts, a hydrocephalus etiology of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to prematurity comprised a higher proportion (47.0% vs 31.2%) and myelomeningocele comprised a lower proportion (17.8% vs 27.3%) (p = 0.024) compared with those with VPl shunts. At 24 months, there was a higher cumulative number of revisions for VA shunts (48.6% vs 38.9%, p = 0.038). When stratified by patient age at shunt insertion, VA shunts in children < 6 years had the lowest shunt survival rate (p < 0.001, log-rank test). After controlling for age and etiology, multivariable analysis did not find that shunt type (VA vs VPl) was predictive of time to shunt failure. No differences were found in the cumulative frequency of complications (VA 6.0% vs VPl 9.2%, p = 0.257), but there was a higher rate of pneumothorax in the VPl cohort (3.1% vs 0%, p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shunt survival was similar between VA and VPl shunts, although VA shunts are used more often, particularly in younger patients. Children < 6 years with VA shunts appeared to have the shortest shunt survival, which may be a result of the VA group having more cases of IVH secondary to prematurity; however, when age and etiology were included in a multivariable model, shunt location (atrium vs pleural space) was not associated with time to failure. The baseline differences between children treated with a VA versus a VPl shunt likely explain current practice patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11244699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing ventriculoatrial and ventriculopleural shunts in pediatric hydrocephalus: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.\",\"authors\":\"Vijay M Ravindra, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Hailey Jensen, William E Whitehead, Abhaya V Kulkarni, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons, Robert P Naftel, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Ian F Pollack, Michael M McDowell, Mandeep S Tamber, Jason S Hauptman, Samuel R Browd, Jonathan Pindrik, Albert M Isaacs, Patrick J McDonald, Todd C Hankinson, Eric M Jackson, Jason Chu, Mark D Krieger, Tamara D Simon, Jennifer M Strahle, Richard Holubkov, Ron Reeder, John R W Kestle\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When the peritoneal cavity cannot serve as the distal shunt terminus, nonperitoneal shunts, typically terminating in the atrium or pleural space, are used. The comparative effectiveness of these two terminus options has not been evaluated. The authors directly compared shunt survival and complication rates for ventriculoatrial (VA) and ventriculopleural (VPl) shunts in a pediatric cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Core Data Project was used to identify children ≤ 18 years of age who underwent either VA or VPl shunt insertion. The primary outcome was time to shunt failure. Secondary outcomes included distal site complications and frequency of shunt failure at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search criteria yielded 416 children from 14 centers with either a VA (n = 318) or VPl (n = 98) shunt, including those converted from ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Children with VA shunts had a lower median age at insertion (6.1 years vs 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Among those children with VA shunts, a hydrocephalus etiology of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to prematurity comprised a higher proportion (47.0% vs 31.2%) and myelomeningocele comprised a lower proportion (17.8% vs 27.3%) (p = 0.024) compared with those with VPl shunts. At 24 months, there was a higher cumulative number of revisions for VA shunts (48.6% vs 38.9%, p = 0.038). When stratified by patient age at shunt insertion, VA shunts in children < 6 years had the lowest shunt survival rate (p < 0.001, log-rank test). After controlling for age and etiology, multivariable analysis did not find that shunt type (VA vs VPl) was predictive of time to shunt failure. No differences were found in the cumulative frequency of complications (VA 6.0% vs VPl 9.2%, p = 0.257), but there was a higher rate of pneumothorax in the VPl cohort (3.1% vs 0%, p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shunt survival was similar between VA and VPl shunts, although VA shunts are used more often, particularly in younger patients. Children < 6 years with VA shunts appeared to have the shortest shunt survival, which may be a result of the VA group having more cases of IVH secondary to prematurity; however, when age and etiology were included in a multivariable model, shunt location (atrium vs pleural space) was not associated with time to failure. The baseline differences between children treated with a VA versus a VPl shunt likely explain current practice patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"305-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11244699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:当腹腔不能作为远端分流终点时,就会使用非腹腔分流,通常以心房或胸膜腔为终点。目前尚未对这两种终点选择的有效性进行比较评估。作者在儿科队列中直接比较了脑室-心房(VA)和脑室-胸膜(VPl)分流术的存活率和并发症发生率:方法:利用脑积水临床研究网络核心数据项目确定接受过VA或VPl分流术的18岁以下儿童。主要结果是分流失败的时间。次要结果包括远端部位并发症以及6、12和24个月时分流失败的频率:根据搜索标准,14个中心的416名患儿接受了VA(n = 318)或VPl(n = 98)分流术,其中包括从脑室腹腔分流术转化而来的患儿。使用 VA 分流的患儿插入时的中位年龄较低(6.1 岁对 12.4 岁,P < 0.001)。在接受VA分流术的患儿中,与接受VPl分流术的患儿相比,因早产而继发脑室内出血(IVH)的脑积水患儿比例较高(47.0% vs 31.2%),而髓鞘膜积液患儿比例较低(17.8% vs 27.3%)(P = 0.024)。在 24 个月时,VA 分流的累计翻修次数更高(48.6% 对 38.9%,p = 0.038)。如果根据患者插入分流管时的年龄进行分层,小于 6 岁儿童的 VA 分流存活率最低(p < 0.001,对数秩检验)。在对年龄和病因进行控制后,多变量分析并未发现分流类型(VA 与 VPl)可预测分流失败的时间。并发症的累积发生率没有差异(VA 6.0% vs VPl 9.2%,p = 0.257),但 VPl 组群的气胸发生率更高(3.1% vs 0%,p = 0.013):结论:尽管VA分流术和VPl分流术的存活率相似,但VA分流术的使用率更高,尤其是在年龄较小的患者中。使用VA分流术的6岁以下儿童的分流术存活时间最短,这可能是由于VA组因早产而继发IVH的病例较多;然而,将年龄和病因纳入多变量模型后,分流术位置(心房与胸膜腔)与失败时间无关。采用VA分流术与VPl分流术治疗的患儿之间的基线差异很可能解释了目前的治疗模式。
Comparing ventriculoatrial and ventriculopleural shunts in pediatric hydrocephalus: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.
Objective: When the peritoneal cavity cannot serve as the distal shunt terminus, nonperitoneal shunts, typically terminating in the atrium or pleural space, are used. The comparative effectiveness of these two terminus options has not been evaluated. The authors directly compared shunt survival and complication rates for ventriculoatrial (VA) and ventriculopleural (VPl) shunts in a pediatric cohort.
Methods: The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Core Data Project was used to identify children ≤ 18 years of age who underwent either VA or VPl shunt insertion. The primary outcome was time to shunt failure. Secondary outcomes included distal site complications and frequency of shunt failure at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Results: The search criteria yielded 416 children from 14 centers with either a VA (n = 318) or VPl (n = 98) shunt, including those converted from ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Children with VA shunts had a lower median age at insertion (6.1 years vs 12.4 years, p < 0.001). Among those children with VA shunts, a hydrocephalus etiology of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to prematurity comprised a higher proportion (47.0% vs 31.2%) and myelomeningocele comprised a lower proportion (17.8% vs 27.3%) (p = 0.024) compared with those with VPl shunts. At 24 months, there was a higher cumulative number of revisions for VA shunts (48.6% vs 38.9%, p = 0.038). When stratified by patient age at shunt insertion, VA shunts in children < 6 years had the lowest shunt survival rate (p < 0.001, log-rank test). After controlling for age and etiology, multivariable analysis did not find that shunt type (VA vs VPl) was predictive of time to shunt failure. No differences were found in the cumulative frequency of complications (VA 6.0% vs VPl 9.2%, p = 0.257), but there was a higher rate of pneumothorax in the VPl cohort (3.1% vs 0%, p = 0.013).
Conclusions: Shunt survival was similar between VA and VPl shunts, although VA shunts are used more often, particularly in younger patients. Children < 6 years with VA shunts appeared to have the shortest shunt survival, which may be a result of the VA group having more cases of IVH secondary to prematurity; however, when age and etiology were included in a multivariable model, shunt location (atrium vs pleural space) was not associated with time to failure. The baseline differences between children treated with a VA versus a VPl shunt likely explain current practice patterns.