Christopher E. Doughty, Camille Gaillard, Patrick Burns, Yadvinder Malhi, Alexander Shenkin, David Minor, Laura Duncanson, Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez, Scott Goetz, Hao Tang
{"title":"卫星推导出的性状数据略微改进了热带森林生物量、NPP 和 GPP 估算结果","authors":"Christopher E. Doughty, Camille Gaillard, Patrick Burns, Yadvinder Malhi, Alexander Shenkin, David Minor, Laura Duncanson, Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez, Scott Goetz, Hao Tang","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above-ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.76 (<i>N</i> = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (<i>N</i> = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satellite Derived Trait Data Slightly Improves Tropical Forest Biomass, NPP and GPP Estimates\",\"authors\":\"Christopher E. Doughty, Camille Gaillard, Patrick Burns, Yadvinder Malhi, Alexander Shenkin, David Minor, Laura Duncanson, Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez, Scott Goetz, Hao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JG008108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above-ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.76 (<i>N</i> = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (<i>N</i> = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Satellite Derived Trait Data Slightly Improves Tropical Forest Biomass, NPP and GPP Estimates
Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above-ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (P < 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (r2 = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (r2 of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, r2 = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an r2 = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an r2 = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (Tmax) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an r2 of 0.76 (N = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (N = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount.
期刊介绍:
JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology