我们是否低估了跑步中踝关节扭伤的频率?系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Thomas Hansoulle , Jean-Louis Peters-Dickie , Philippe Mahaudens , Anh Phong Nguyen
{"title":"我们是否低估了跑步中踝关节扭伤的频率?系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Thomas Hansoulle ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Peters-Dickie ,&nbsp;Philippe Mahaudens ,&nbsp;Anh Phong Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of ankle sprains in running practices.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We calculated the weighted summary proportion and conducted meta-analyses for runners, considering levels (elite/recreational) and disciplines (distance, track, cross-country, trail, and orienteering).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>32 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 were included in the meta-analysis with a level of quality ranging from poor to good. Proportion of ankle sprains in runners was 13.69% (95%CI = 7.40–21.54; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.58%) in global, 12.20% (95%CI = 5.24–21.53; I<sup>2</sup> = 89.31%) in elite, 19.40% (95%CI = 10.05–30.90; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.09%) in recreational, 8.51% (95%CI = 4.22–14.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.15%) in distance, 67.42% (95%CI = 0.50–82.85; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.36%) in track, 27.07% (95%CI = 12.48–44.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.97%) in cross-country, and 25.70% (95%CI = 19.87–32.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00) in orienteering.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Running practice results in significant proportion rate of ankle sprains. Recreational runners exhibit higher proportion than elite. Running disciplines, especially track, cross-country, and orienteering, influence reported ankle sprain rates, surpassing those of distance runners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we underestimate the frequency of ankle sprains in running? A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hansoulle ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Peters-Dickie ,&nbsp;Philippe Mahaudens ,&nbsp;Anh Phong Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of ankle sprains in running practices.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We calculated the weighted summary proportion and conducted meta-analyses for runners, considering levels (elite/recreational) and disciplines (distance, track, cross-country, trail, and orienteering).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>32 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 were included in the meta-analysis with a level of quality ranging from poor to good. Proportion of ankle sprains in runners was 13.69% (95%CI = 7.40–21.54; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.58%) in global, 12.20% (95%CI = 5.24–21.53; I<sup>2</sup> = 89.31%) in elite, 19.40% (95%CI = 10.05–30.90; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.09%) in recreational, 8.51% (95%CI = 4.22–14.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.15%) in distance, 67.42% (95%CI = 0.50–82.85; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.36%) in track, 27.07% (95%CI = 12.48–44.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.97%) in cross-country, and 25.70% (95%CI = 19.87–32.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00) in orienteering.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Running practice results in significant proportion rate of ankle sprains. Recreational runners exhibit higher proportion than elite. Running disciplines, especially track, cross-country, and orienteering, influence reported ankle sprain rates, surpassing those of distance runners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000713\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 对跑步过程中踝关节扭伤的比例进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:对跑步实践中踝关节扭伤的比例进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:主要结果测量:我们计算了加权汇总比例,并对跑步者进行了荟萃分析,考虑了跑步者的水平(精英/休闲)和项目(长跑、田径、越野、越野跑和定向越野):32项研究被纳入系统综述,19项研究被纳入荟萃分析,研究质量从差到好不等。全球跑步者踝关节扭伤的比例为 13.69% (95%CI = 7.40-21.54; I2 = 98.58%),精英跑步者为 12.20% (95%CI = 5.24-21.53; I2 = 89.31%),娱乐跑步者为 19.40% (95%CI = 10.05-30.90; I2 = 99.09%),休闲跑步者为 8.51% (95%CI = 4.22-14.12; I2 = 96.15%),田径67.42% (95%CI = 0.50-82.85; I2 = 99.36%),越野27.07% (95%CI = 12.48-44.81; I2 = 97.97%),定向25.70% (95%CI = 19.87-32.14; I2 = 0.00):结论:跑步练习导致踝关节扭伤的比例很高。结论:跑步练习导致踝关节扭伤的比例很高,休闲跑步者的比例高于精英跑步者。跑步项目,尤其是田径、越野和定向运动,对踝关节扭伤率的影响超过了长跑运动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do we underestimate the frequency of ankle sprains in running? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of ankle sprains in running practices.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Main outcome measures

We calculated the weighted summary proportion and conducted meta-analyses for runners, considering levels (elite/recreational) and disciplines (distance, track, cross-country, trail, and orienteering).

Results

32 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 were included in the meta-analysis with a level of quality ranging from poor to good. Proportion of ankle sprains in runners was 13.69% (95%CI = 7.40–21.54; I2 = 98.58%) in global, 12.20% (95%CI = 5.24–21.53; I2 = 89.31%) in elite, 19.40% (95%CI = 10.05–30.90; I2 = 99.09%) in recreational, 8.51% (95%CI = 4.22–14.12; I2 = 96.15%) in distance, 67.42% (95%CI = 0.50–82.85; I2 = 99.36%) in track, 27.07% (95%CI = 12.48–44.81; I2 = 97.97%) in cross-country, and 25.70% (95%CI = 19.87–32.14; I2 = 0.00) in orienteering.

Conclusions

Running practice results in significant proportion rate of ankle sprains. Recreational runners exhibit higher proportion than elite. Running disciplines, especially track, cross-country, and orienteering, influence reported ankle sprain rates, surpassing those of distance runners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信