验证 fNIRS 测量年轻人、老年人和帕金森病患者在行走过程中执行和不执行双重任务时的执行需求。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Alexander Kvist , Lucian Bezuidenhout , Hanna Johansson , Franziska Albrecht , David Moulaee Conradsson , Erika Franzén
{"title":"验证 fNIRS 测量年轻人、老年人和帕金森病患者在行走过程中执行和不执行双重任务时的执行需求。","authors":"Alexander Kvist ,&nbsp;Lucian Bezuidenhout ,&nbsp;Hanna Johansson ,&nbsp;Franziska Albrecht ,&nbsp;David Moulaee Conradsson ,&nbsp;Erika Franzén","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Walking with a concurrent cognitive task (dual-task walking) can pose a challenge to some populations due to aging or neurodegenerative disease. These tasks require cognitive resources involving the prefrontal cortex and can be studied using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). An important step in understanding fNIRS measures during such walking tasks is validating that measures reflect the demands of the tasks and not confounding sources or movement artifacts.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the validity of fNIRS measures of prefrontal cortex activity as an indicator of executive demand during usual walking (single-task) and dual-task walking against clinical and objective measures of motor behavior in young adults, older adults, and people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), by evaluating several validation hypotheses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 133 participants were recruited from younger adults (18–50 years, n = 42), older adults (≥60 years, n = 49) and people with PD (≥60 years, n = 42). Activity in the prefrontal cortex during walking with and without an auditory Stroop task was measured with fNIRS. A combined hemoglobin measure (correlation-based signal improvement, CBSI) was calculated for use in a region of interest analysis in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Pre-registered hypotheses regarding convergent validity, discriminant validity and known group validity were tested. An exploratory analysis of different hemoglobin measures was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Increases in dlPFC activity were found from single- to dual-task walking in the younger adults group and from rest to single-task walking in the older adults and PD groups. In line with hypotheses, a positive relationship was found between between dlPFC activity during dual-task walking and dual-task cost in the younger adults group, as well as a positive relationship to step time variability during single-task walking and a negative relationship to walking speed during single-task walking in the PD group. However, several clinical and gait measures lacked a relationship with dlPFC activity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The fNIRS results point towards the CBSI measure of dlPFC activity being a valid measure of executive demand during both single and dual-task walking. Some relationships between clinical and gait measures and brain activity during walking need further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000767/pdfft?md5=ae07729c75b9b822bf4adc0656c92121&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000767-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of fNIRS measurement of executive demand during walking with and without dual-task in younger and older adults and people with Parkinson’s disease\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Kvist ,&nbsp;Lucian Bezuidenhout ,&nbsp;Hanna Johansson ,&nbsp;Franziska Albrecht ,&nbsp;David Moulaee Conradsson ,&nbsp;Erika Franzén\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Walking with a concurrent cognitive task (dual-task walking) can pose a challenge to some populations due to aging or neurodegenerative disease. These tasks require cognitive resources involving the prefrontal cortex and can be studied using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). An important step in understanding fNIRS measures during such walking tasks is validating that measures reflect the demands of the tasks and not confounding sources or movement artifacts.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the validity of fNIRS measures of prefrontal cortex activity as an indicator of executive demand during usual walking (single-task) and dual-task walking against clinical and objective measures of motor behavior in young adults, older adults, and people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), by evaluating several validation hypotheses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 133 participants were recruited from younger adults (18–50 years, n = 42), older adults (≥60 years, n = 49) and people with PD (≥60 years, n = 42). Activity in the prefrontal cortex during walking with and without an auditory Stroop task was measured with fNIRS. A combined hemoglobin measure (correlation-based signal improvement, CBSI) was calculated for use in a region of interest analysis in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Pre-registered hypotheses regarding convergent validity, discriminant validity and known group validity were tested. An exploratory analysis of different hemoglobin measures was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Increases in dlPFC activity were found from single- to dual-task walking in the younger adults group and from rest to single-task walking in the older adults and PD groups. In line with hypotheses, a positive relationship was found between between dlPFC activity during dual-task walking and dual-task cost in the younger adults group, as well as a positive relationship to step time variability during single-task walking and a negative relationship to walking speed during single-task walking in the PD group. However, several clinical and gait measures lacked a relationship with dlPFC activity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The fNIRS results point towards the CBSI measure of dlPFC activity being a valid measure of executive demand during both single and dual-task walking. Some relationships between clinical and gait measures and brain activity during walking need further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000767/pdfft?md5=ae07729c75b9b822bf4adc0656c92121&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000767-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000767\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于老龄化或神经退行性疾病,行走时同时执行认知任务(双任务行走)会对某些人群构成挑战。这些任务需要涉及前额叶皮层的认知资源,可以使用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)进行研究。目的:本研究旨在通过评估几种验证假设,研究前额叶皮层活动的 fNIRS 测量值作为通常步行(单任务)和双任务步行过程中执行需求指标的有效性,并将其与年轻人、老年人和帕金森病(PD)患者运动行为的临床客观测量值进行对比:共招募了 133 名参与者,分别来自年轻人(18-50 岁,42 人)、老年人(≥60 岁,49 人)和帕金森病患者(≥60 岁,42 人)。用 fNIRS 测量了在行走过程中进行和不进行听觉 Stroop 任务时前额叶皮层的活动。计算出的血红蛋白综合测量值(基于相关性的信号改善,CBSI)用于背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)的感兴趣区分析。对预先注册的有关收敛有效性、判别有效性和已知群体有效性的假设进行了测试。此外,还对不同的血红蛋白测量方法进行了探索性分析:结果:发现在年轻成人组中,从单一任务步行到双重任务步行,以及在老年人组和帕金森病组中,从休息到单一任务步行,dlPFC 活动均有所增加。与假设相符的是,在年轻成人组中,双任务步行时的dlPFC活动与双任务成本之间存在正相关关系;在帕金森病组中,单任务步行时的步速变异性与步行速度之间存在正相关关系,而单任务步行时的步速变异性与步行速度之间存在负相关关系。然而,一些临床和步态测量结果与大脑皮层活动没有关系:fNIRS的研究结果表明,CBSI测量的dlPFC活动是衡量单任务和双任务步行过程中执行需求的有效方法。临床和步态测量与步行时大脑活动之间的一些关系需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of fNIRS measurement of executive demand during walking with and without dual-task in younger and older adults and people with Parkinson’s disease

Background

Walking with a concurrent cognitive task (dual-task walking) can pose a challenge to some populations due to aging or neurodegenerative disease. These tasks require cognitive resources involving the prefrontal cortex and can be studied using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). An important step in understanding fNIRS measures during such walking tasks is validating that measures reflect the demands of the tasks and not confounding sources or movement artifacts.

Aim

This study aimed to investigate the validity of fNIRS measures of prefrontal cortex activity as an indicator of executive demand during usual walking (single-task) and dual-task walking against clinical and objective measures of motor behavior in young adults, older adults, and people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), by evaluating several validation hypotheses.

Methods

In total, 133 participants were recruited from younger adults (18–50 years, n = 42), older adults (≥60 years, n = 49) and people with PD (≥60 years, n = 42). Activity in the prefrontal cortex during walking with and without an auditory Stroop task was measured with fNIRS. A combined hemoglobin measure (correlation-based signal improvement, CBSI) was calculated for use in a region of interest analysis in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Pre-registered hypotheses regarding convergent validity, discriminant validity and known group validity were tested. An exploratory analysis of different hemoglobin measures was also performed.

Results

Increases in dlPFC activity were found from single- to dual-task walking in the younger adults group and from rest to single-task walking in the older adults and PD groups. In line with hypotheses, a positive relationship was found between between dlPFC activity during dual-task walking and dual-task cost in the younger adults group, as well as a positive relationship to step time variability during single-task walking and a negative relationship to walking speed during single-task walking in the PD group. However, several clinical and gait measures lacked a relationship with dlPFC activity.

Conclusion

The fNIRS results point towards the CBSI measure of dlPFC activity being a valid measure of executive demand during both single and dual-task walking. Some relationships between clinical and gait measures and brain activity during walking need further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信