自动检测克罗恩病 CT 肠造影结果的机器学习方法:可行性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ashish P. Wasnik , Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary , Binu Enchakalody , Stewart C. Wang , Grace L. Su , Ryan W. Stidham
{"title":"自动检测克罗恩病 CT 肠造影结果的机器学习方法:可行性研究。","authors":"Ashish P. Wasnik ,&nbsp;Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary ,&nbsp;Binu Enchakalody ,&nbsp;Stewart C. Wang ,&nbsp;Grace L. Su ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Stidham","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Qualitative findings in Crohn's disease (CD) can be challenging to reliably report and quantify. We evaluated machine learning methodologies to both standardize the detection of common qualitative findings of ileal CD and determine finding spatial localization on CT enterography (CTE).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Subjects with ileal CD and a CTE from a single center retrospective study between 2016 and 2021 were included. 165 CTEs were reviewed by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists for the presence and spatial distribution of five qualitative CD findings: mural enhancement, mural stratification, stenosis, wall thickening, and mesenteric fat stranding. A Random Forest (RF) ensemble model using automatically extracted specialist-directed bowel features and an unbiased convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to predict the presence of qualitative findings. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa agreement statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 165 subjects with 29,895 individual qualitative finding assessments, agreement between radiologists for localization was good to very good (κ = 0.66 to 0.73), except for mesenteric fat stranding (κ = 0.47). RF prediction models had excellent performance, with an overall AUC, sensitivity, specificity of 0.91, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. RF model and radiologist agreement for localization of CD findings approximated agreement between radiologists (κ = 0.67 to 0.76). Unbiased CNN models without benefit of disease knowledge had very similar performance to RF models which used specialist-defined imaging features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Machine learning techniques for CTE image analysis can identify the presence, location, and distribution of qualitative CD findings with similar performance to experienced radiologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning methods in automated detection of CT enterography findings in Crohn's disease: A feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Ashish P. Wasnik ,&nbsp;Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary ,&nbsp;Binu Enchakalody ,&nbsp;Stewart C. Wang ,&nbsp;Grace L. Su ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Stidham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Qualitative findings in Crohn's disease (CD) can be challenging to reliably report and quantify. We evaluated machine learning methodologies to both standardize the detection of common qualitative findings of ileal CD and determine finding spatial localization on CT enterography (CTE).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Subjects with ileal CD and a CTE from a single center retrospective study between 2016 and 2021 were included. 165 CTEs were reviewed by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists for the presence and spatial distribution of five qualitative CD findings: mural enhancement, mural stratification, stenosis, wall thickening, and mesenteric fat stranding. A Random Forest (RF) ensemble model using automatically extracted specialist-directed bowel features and an unbiased convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to predict the presence of qualitative findings. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa agreement statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 165 subjects with 29,895 individual qualitative finding assessments, agreement between radiologists for localization was good to very good (κ = 0.66 to 0.73), except for mesenteric fat stranding (κ = 0.47). RF prediction models had excellent performance, with an overall AUC, sensitivity, specificity of 0.91, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. RF model and radiologist agreement for localization of CD findings approximated agreement between radiologists (κ = 0.67 to 0.76). Unbiased CNN models without benefit of disease knowledge had very similar performance to RF models which used specialist-defined imaging features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Machine learning techniques for CTE image analysis can identify the presence, location, and distribution of qualitative CD findings with similar performance to experienced radiologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400161X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089970712400161X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:克罗恩病(CD)的定性结果很难可靠地报告和量化。我们评估了机器学习方法,以规范回肠 CD 常见定性结果的检测,并确定 CT 肠造影(CTE)上的发现空间定位:纳入2016年至2021年间单中心回顾性研究中患有回肠CD和CTE的受试者。两名受过专业培训的腹部放射科医师对 165 份 CTE 进行了审查,以确定五种定性 CD 发现的存在和空间分布:壁层增强、壁层分层、狭窄、壁层增厚和肠系膜脂肪绞窄。利用自动提取的专科定向肠道特征和无偏卷积神经网络(CNN)开发了随机森林(RF)集合模型,用于预测定性结果的存在。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、准确性和卡帕一致性统计来评估模型性能:在对 165 名受试者的 29,895 个定性结果评估中,除了肠系膜脂肪绞窄(κ = 0.47)外,放射科医生之间的定位一致性良好至非常好(κ = 0.66 至 0.73)。射频预测模型性能卓越,总体AUC、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.91、0.81和0.85。射频模型和放射科医生对 CD 检查结果定位的一致性接近放射科医生之间的一致性(κ = 0.67 至 0.76)。没有疾病知识的无偏 CNN 模型与使用专家定义的成像特征的 RF 模型性能非常相似:用于 CTE 图像分析的机器学习技术可以识别 CD 定性结果的存在、位置和分布,其性能与经验丰富的放射科医生相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning methods in automated detection of CT enterography findings in Crohn's disease: A feasibility study

Purpose

Qualitative findings in Crohn's disease (CD) can be challenging to reliably report and quantify. We evaluated machine learning methodologies to both standardize the detection of common qualitative findings of ileal CD and determine finding spatial localization on CT enterography (CTE).

Materials and methods

Subjects with ileal CD and a CTE from a single center retrospective study between 2016 and 2021 were included. 165 CTEs were reviewed by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists for the presence and spatial distribution of five qualitative CD findings: mural enhancement, mural stratification, stenosis, wall thickening, and mesenteric fat stranding. A Random Forest (RF) ensemble model using automatically extracted specialist-directed bowel features and an unbiased convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to predict the presence of qualitative findings. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa agreement statistics.

Results

In 165 subjects with 29,895 individual qualitative finding assessments, agreement between radiologists for localization was good to very good (κ = 0.66 to 0.73), except for mesenteric fat stranding (κ = 0.47). RF prediction models had excellent performance, with an overall AUC, sensitivity, specificity of 0.91, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. RF model and radiologist agreement for localization of CD findings approximated agreement between radiologists (κ = 0.67 to 0.76). Unbiased CNN models without benefit of disease knowledge had very similar performance to RF models which used specialist-defined imaging features.

Conclusion

Machine learning techniques for CTE image analysis can identify the presence, location, and distribution of qualitative CD findings with similar performance to experienced radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信