激肽 B1 受体和 TLR4 在炎症反应中的相互作用

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s00011-024-01909-1
Carolina Batista, João Victor Roza Cruz, Joice Stipursky, Fabio de Almeida Mendes, João Bosco Pesquero
{"title":"激肽 B1 受体和 TLR4 在炎症反应中的相互作用","authors":"Carolina Batista, João Victor Roza Cruz, Joice Stipursky, Fabio de Almeida Mendes, João Bosco Pesquero","doi":"10.1007/s00011-024-01909-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to broaden our understanding of a potential interaction between B1R and TLR4, considering earlier studies suggesting that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may trigger B1R stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the impact of DBK and LPS on the membrane potential of thoracic aortas from C57BL/6, B1R, or TLR4 knockout mice. Additionally, we examined the staining patterns of these receptors in the thoracic aortas of C57BL/6 and in endothelial cells (HBMEC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBK does not affect the resting membrane potential of aortic rings in C57BL/6 mice, but it hyperpolarizes preparations in B<sub>1</sub>KO and TLR4KO mice. The hyperpolarization mechanism in B<sub>1</sub>KO mice involves B2R, and the TLR4KO response is independent of cytoplasmic calcium influx but relies on potassium channels. Conversely, LPS hyperpolarizes thoracic aorta rings in both C57BL/6 and B<sub>1</sub>KO mice, with the response unaffected by a B1R antagonist. Interestingly, the absence of B1R alters the LPS response to potassium channels. These activities are independent of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). While exposure to DBK and LPS does not alter B1R and TLR4 mRNA expression, treatment with these agonists increases B1R staining in endothelial cells of thoracic aortic rings and modifies the staining pattern of B1R and TLR4 in endothelial cells. Proximity ligation assay suggests a interaction between the receptors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide additional support for a putative connection between B1R and TLR4 signaling. Given the involvement of these receptors and their agonists in inflammation, it suggests that drugs and therapies targeting their effects could be promising therapeutic avenues worth exploring.</p>","PeriodicalId":13550,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation Research","volume":" ","pages":"1459-1476"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinin B<sub>1</sub> receptor and TLR4 interaction in inflammatory response.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Batista, João Victor Roza Cruz, Joice Stipursky, Fabio de Almeida Mendes, João Bosco Pesquero\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00011-024-01909-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to broaden our understanding of a potential interaction between B1R and TLR4, considering earlier studies suggesting that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may trigger B1R stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the impact of DBK and LPS on the membrane potential of thoracic aortas from C57BL/6, B1R, or TLR4 knockout mice. Additionally, we examined the staining patterns of these receptors in the thoracic aortas of C57BL/6 and in endothelial cells (HBMEC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBK does not affect the resting membrane potential of aortic rings in C57BL/6 mice, but it hyperpolarizes preparations in B<sub>1</sub>KO and TLR4KO mice. The hyperpolarization mechanism in B<sub>1</sub>KO mice involves B2R, and the TLR4KO response is independent of cytoplasmic calcium influx but relies on potassium channels. Conversely, LPS hyperpolarizes thoracic aorta rings in both C57BL/6 and B<sub>1</sub>KO mice, with the response unaffected by a B1R antagonist. Interestingly, the absence of B1R alters the LPS response to potassium channels. These activities are independent of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). While exposure to DBK and LPS does not alter B1R and TLR4 mRNA expression, treatment with these agonists increases B1R staining in endothelial cells of thoracic aortic rings and modifies the staining pattern of B1R and TLR4 in endothelial cells. Proximity ligation assay suggests a interaction between the receptors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide additional support for a putative connection between B1R and TLR4 signaling. Given the involvement of these receptors and their agonists in inflammation, it suggests that drugs and therapies targeting their effects could be promising therapeutic avenues worth exploring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1459-1476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-024-01909-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-024-01909-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的考虑到先前的研究表明脂多糖(LPS)可能会触发 B1R 刺激,我们旨在扩大我们对 B1R 和 TLR4 之间潜在相互作用的理解:我们评估了 DBK 和 LPS 对 C57BL/6、B1R 或 TLR4 基因敲除小鼠胸主动脉膜电位的影响。此外,我们还检查了这些受体在 C57BL/6 小鼠主动脉和内皮细胞(HBMEC)中的染色模式:结果:DBK 不影响 C57BL/6 小鼠主动脉环的静息膜电位,但它能使 B1KO 和 TLR4KO 小鼠的制备过度极化。B1KO 小鼠的超极化机制涉及 B2R,而 TLR4KO 的反应与胞质钙离子流入无关,而是依赖于钾通道。相反,LPS 可使 C57BL/6 和 B1KO 小鼠的胸主动脉环超极化,而 B1R 拮抗剂不会影响这种反应。有趣的是,B1R 的缺失会改变 LPS 对钾通道的反应。这些活动与一氧化氮合酶(NOS)无关。虽然暴露于 DBK 和 LPS 不会改变 B1R 和 TLR4 mRNA 的表达,但用这些激动剂处理会增加胸主动脉环内皮细胞中的 B1R 染色,并改变内皮细胞中 B1R 和 TLR4 的染色模式。近接实验表明受体之间存在相互作用:我们的研究结果为 B1R 和 TLR4 信号传导之间的假定联系提供了更多支持。鉴于这些受体及其激动剂在炎症中的参与,这表明针对其效应的药物和疗法可能是值得探索的有前途的治疗途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Kinin B<sub>1</sub> receptor and TLR4 interaction in inflammatory response.

Kinin B1 receptor and TLR4 interaction in inflammatory response.

Objective: We aimed to broaden our understanding of a potential interaction between B1R and TLR4, considering earlier studies suggesting that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may trigger B1R stimulation.

Methods: We assessed the impact of DBK and LPS on the membrane potential of thoracic aortas from C57BL/6, B1R, or TLR4 knockout mice. Additionally, we examined the staining patterns of these receptors in the thoracic aortas of C57BL/6 and in endothelial cells (HBMEC).

Results: DBK does not affect the resting membrane potential of aortic rings in C57BL/6 mice, but it hyperpolarizes preparations in B1KO and TLR4KO mice. The hyperpolarization mechanism in B1KO mice involves B2R, and the TLR4KO response is independent of cytoplasmic calcium influx but relies on potassium channels. Conversely, LPS hyperpolarizes thoracic aorta rings in both C57BL/6 and B1KO mice, with the response unaffected by a B1R antagonist. Interestingly, the absence of B1R alters the LPS response to potassium channels. These activities are independent of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). While exposure to DBK and LPS does not alter B1R and TLR4 mRNA expression, treatment with these agonists increases B1R staining in endothelial cells of thoracic aortic rings and modifies the staining pattern of B1R and TLR4 in endothelial cells. Proximity ligation assay suggests a interaction between the receptors.

Conclusion: Our findings provide additional support for a putative connection between B1R and TLR4 signaling. Given the involvement of these receptors and their agonists in inflammation, it suggests that drugs and therapies targeting their effects could be promising therapeutic avenues worth exploring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammation Research
Inflammation Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Inflammation Research (IR) publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of inflammation and related fields including histopathology, immunological mechanisms, gene expression, mediators, experimental models, clinical investigations and the effect of drugs. Related fields are broadly defined and include for instance, allergy and asthma, shock, pain, joint damage, skin disease as well as clinical trials of relevant drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信