在成人严重烧伤患者中使用艾司他敏进行初级智能镇痛:对镇痛效果、胃肠功能和精神状态影响的双盲随机试验

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Burns Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004
Qiulan He, Qi Liu, Bing Liang, Xu Zhao, Wenqi Huang, Shaowei Gao, Caiyun Chen, Fei Zhou, Zhongxing Wang
{"title":"在成人严重烧伤患者中使用艾司他敏进行初级智能镇痛:对镇痛效果、胃肠功能和精神状态影响的双盲随机试验","authors":"Qiulan He, Qi Liu, Bing Liang, Xu Zhao, Wenqi Huang, Shaowei Gao, Caiyun Chen, Fei Zhou, Zhongxing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction. A dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for perioperative period in patients with severe [20–50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive ( 50 % TBSA) burns comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opium consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires. Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values ( 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption ( 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm. Esketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry () (ChiCTR2000034069).","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esketamine use for primary intelligent analgesia in adults with severe burns: A double-blind randomized trial with effects on analgesic efficacy, gastrointestinal function and mental state\",\"authors\":\"Qiulan He, Qi Liu, Bing Liang, Xu Zhao, Wenqi Huang, Shaowei Gao, Caiyun Chen, Fei Zhou, Zhongxing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Opioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction. A dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for perioperative period in patients with severe [20–50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive ( 50 % TBSA) burns comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opium consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires. Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values ( 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption ( 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm. Esketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry () (ChiCTR2000034069).\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.06.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于烧伤患者镇痛的阿片类药物消耗量巨大。用于烧伤疼痛治疗的非阿片类镇痛药可节省阿片类药物,减少与阿片类药物相关的不良反应以及药物耐受性或成瘾性。一项双中心随机对照试验评估了 Esketamine 对重度烧伤(体表总面积为 20%-50% TBSA)和大面积烧伤(体表总面积为 50%TBSA)患者围手术期的镇痛效果,并将其与标准麻醉进行了比较。60 名患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到两个治疗组。在治疗组,患者在术中使用爱斯卡胺,术后使用爱斯卡胺静脉注射初级智能镇痛泵。对照组患者接受与治疗组相同的干预措施,但不使用爱斯氯胺酮。主要终点是第28天或出院前一天的主观镇痛效果(SAE)评估。次要结果包括术后休息时(NPRr)和运动时(NPRm)的数字疼痛评分表(NPR)以及鸦片消耗量。胃肠功能紊乱评分(GIDS)和肠道损伤血清标志物[肠道脂肪酸结合蛋白2(iFabp2)和载脂蛋白A2(ApoA2)]在损伤后第1周和第4周进行测量。抑郁和睡眠质量通过相关问卷进行评估。55名患者被纳入分析。与对照组相比,Esketamine治疗组的镇痛效果更好(1级或2级SAE评分的患者比例为67.9%对40.7%,0.022)。与对照组相比,Esketamine 治疗患者的 NPRm 值(0.033)更低,每日阿片类药物用量(0.033)更低。经爱斯基胺治疗的患者的胃肠道恢复情况与对照组相当。治疗组患者的总体睡眠质量可能有所改善。在严重烧伤的围手术期初级智能镇痛中使用爱斯基胺是安全的,可改善静息痛控制并降低阿片类药物的需求量。该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册()(ChiCTR2000034069)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Esketamine use for primary intelligent analgesia in adults with severe burns: A double-blind randomized trial with effects on analgesic efficacy, gastrointestinal function and mental state
Opioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction. A dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for perioperative period in patients with severe [20–50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive ( 50 % TBSA) burns comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opium consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires. Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values ( 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption ( 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm. Esketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry () (ChiCTR2000034069).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信