工作连通性要求喜忧参半:作为调节因素的自我调节重点

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Qi Nie, Vivien K. G. Lim, Jian Peng
{"title":"工作连通性要求喜忧参半:作为调节因素的自我调节重点","authors":"Qi Nie,&nbsp;Vivien K. G. Lim,&nbsp;Jian Peng","doi":"10.1002/job.2813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Due to the rapid development of information and communication technologies, employees increasingly feel pressure to engage in work connectivity behavior after regular working hours (WCBA), giving rise to a novel form of job demand known as WCBA demands. This research examined the upside and downside of WCBA demands. Specifically, we defined WCBA demands as stressors that can be appraised by employees as challenges and/or threats. Challenge appraisals are related to job involvement, which in turn leads to job satisfaction and job performance; threat appraisals are related to job-induced tension, which in turn leads to family dissatisfaction and family incivility. We also examine regulatory focus as a boundary condition underlying the challenge-threat paradox of WCBA demands. To test the relationships among our hypotheses, we conducted a daily diary survey study of 176 employee-supervisor-spouse triads across five consecutive workdays. The findings show that employees with higher levels of promotion focus were more likely to appraise WCBA demands as challenges, which improved their work outcomes via increased job involvement. Employees with higher levels of prevention focus appraised WCBA demands as threats, which undermined their family outcomes via job-induced tension. Since these findings assume that WCBA demands act as stressors, we conducted a supplemental qualitative study (<i>N</i> = 19) confirming that employees commonly perceive WCBA demands as stressors. The implications for theory and research are discussed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"45 7","pages":"960-980"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mixed blessing of work connectivity demands: Self-regulatory focus as a moderator\",\"authors\":\"Qi Nie,&nbsp;Vivien K. G. Lim,&nbsp;Jian Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/job.2813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Due to the rapid development of information and communication technologies, employees increasingly feel pressure to engage in work connectivity behavior after regular working hours (WCBA), giving rise to a novel form of job demand known as WCBA demands. This research examined the upside and downside of WCBA demands. Specifically, we defined WCBA demands as stressors that can be appraised by employees as challenges and/or threats. Challenge appraisals are related to job involvement, which in turn leads to job satisfaction and job performance; threat appraisals are related to job-induced tension, which in turn leads to family dissatisfaction and family incivility. We also examine regulatory focus as a boundary condition underlying the challenge-threat paradox of WCBA demands. To test the relationships among our hypotheses, we conducted a daily diary survey study of 176 employee-supervisor-spouse triads across five consecutive workdays. The findings show that employees with higher levels of promotion focus were more likely to appraise WCBA demands as challenges, which improved their work outcomes via increased job involvement. Employees with higher levels of prevention focus appraised WCBA demands as threats, which undermined their family outcomes via job-induced tension. Since these findings assume that WCBA demands act as stressors, we conducted a supplemental qualitative study (<i>N</i> = 19) confirming that employees commonly perceive WCBA demands as stressors. The implications for theory and research are discussed.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"45 7\",\"pages\":\"960-980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2813\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于信息和通信技术的飞速发展,员工越来越感到在正常工作时间之外从事工作连接行为(WCBA)的压力,从而产生了一种新的工作需求形式,即 WCBA 需求。本研究探讨了 WCBA 需求的优势和劣势。具体来说,我们将 WCBA 需求定义为可被员工评价为挑战和/或威胁的压力源。挑战评估与工作参与度有关,而工作参与度又会导致工作满意度和工作绩效;威胁评估与工作引发的紧张局势有关,而紧张局势又会导致家庭不满和家庭不和睦。我们还研究了监管重点,将其作为 WCBA 要求的挑战-威胁悖论的边界条件。为了检验我们的假设之间的关系,我们对 176 名员工-主管-配偶三方在连续五个工作日内的日常日记调查进行了研究。研究结果表明,对晋升关注度较高的员工更有可能将工作能力评估要求视为挑战,从而通过提高工作参与度来改善工作成果。而对预防工作关注度较高的员工则将 WCBA 的要求视为威胁,从而通过工作引起的紧张感破坏了他们的家庭成果。由于这些研究结果假定 WCBA 要求是压力源,因此我们进行了一项补充性定性研究(N = 19),证实员工普遍认为 WCBA 要求是压力源。本文讨论了这些研究对理论和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The mixed blessing of work connectivity demands: Self-regulatory focus as a moderator

Due to the rapid development of information and communication technologies, employees increasingly feel pressure to engage in work connectivity behavior after regular working hours (WCBA), giving rise to a novel form of job demand known as WCBA demands. This research examined the upside and downside of WCBA demands. Specifically, we defined WCBA demands as stressors that can be appraised by employees as challenges and/or threats. Challenge appraisals are related to job involvement, which in turn leads to job satisfaction and job performance; threat appraisals are related to job-induced tension, which in turn leads to family dissatisfaction and family incivility. We also examine regulatory focus as a boundary condition underlying the challenge-threat paradox of WCBA demands. To test the relationships among our hypotheses, we conducted a daily diary survey study of 176 employee-supervisor-spouse triads across five consecutive workdays. The findings show that employees with higher levels of promotion focus were more likely to appraise WCBA demands as challenges, which improved their work outcomes via increased job involvement. Employees with higher levels of prevention focus appraised WCBA demands as threats, which undermined their family outcomes via job-induced tension. Since these findings assume that WCBA demands act as stressors, we conducted a supplemental qualitative study (N = 19) confirming that employees commonly perceive WCBA demands as stressors. The implications for theory and research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信