免耕对密西西比河下游流域土壤有机碳和土壤质量的影响:对可持续管理的影响

Helen C. S. Amorim, Amanda J. Ashworth, Mubvumba Partson, Mary C. Savin, Saseendran S. Anapalli, Krishna N. Reddy
{"title":"免耕对密西西比河下游流域土壤有机碳和土壤质量的影响:对可持续管理的影响","authors":"Helen C. S. Amorim,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ashworth,&nbsp;Mubvumba Partson,&nbsp;Mary C. Savin,&nbsp;Saseendran S. Anapalli,&nbsp;Krishna N. Reddy","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>No-till (NT) alleviates adverse effects of agricultural production on environmental quality, improves soil health, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, yet this has not been demonstrated in humid subtropical Mississippi. Research objectives were to evaluate nutrient and C dynamics and soil quality via Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) following 15 years of continuous management under corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) (2008–2018) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] (2019–2022) on a Dundee silt loam soil. After 15 years, soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks (0- to 30-cm depth) under NT were 25% higher than conventional tillage (CT). Between 2020 and 2022, SOC stocks increased 3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> under NT and decreased 2 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> under CT. Increased SOC retention under NT could represent an opportunity for increasing the systems’ profitability as C markets expand. Greater SOC and aggregation scores improved SMAF soil quality index (SQI) under NT (71%), compared to CT (66%), underscoring the critical role of organic matter in soil functioning in managed agrosystems. Soybean yields were not linked to SMAF SQI (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), suggesting that crop yields are mostly affected by non-edaphic factors (e.g., climate extremes). SMAF illustrated positive impacts of NT on SOC sequestration and soil health, which may foster its adoption as a conservation practice in the Lower Mississippi River basin. As such, NT stands as a climate-smart management practice that allows for sustainable intensification in humid subtropical regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20717","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No-till impacts on soil organic carbon and soil quality in the Lower Mississippi River basin: Implications for sustainable management\",\"authors\":\"Helen C. S. Amorim,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ashworth,&nbsp;Mubvumba Partson,&nbsp;Mary C. Savin,&nbsp;Saseendran S. Anapalli,&nbsp;Krishna N. Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>No-till (NT) alleviates adverse effects of agricultural production on environmental quality, improves soil health, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, yet this has not been demonstrated in humid subtropical Mississippi. Research objectives were to evaluate nutrient and C dynamics and soil quality via Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) following 15 years of continuous management under corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) (2008–2018) and soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] (2019–2022) on a Dundee silt loam soil. After 15 years, soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks (0- to 30-cm depth) under NT were 25% higher than conventional tillage (CT). Between 2020 and 2022, SOC stocks increased 3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> under NT and decreased 2 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> under CT. Increased SOC retention under NT could represent an opportunity for increasing the systems’ profitability as C markets expand. Greater SOC and aggregation scores improved SMAF soil quality index (SQI) under NT (71%), compared to CT (66%), underscoring the critical role of organic matter in soil functioning in managed agrosystems. Soybean yields were not linked to SMAF SQI (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), suggesting that crop yields are mostly affected by non-edaphic factors (e.g., climate extremes). SMAF illustrated positive impacts of NT on SOC sequestration and soil health, which may foster its adoption as a conservation practice in the Lower Mississippi River basin. As such, NT stands as a climate-smart management practice that allows for sustainable intensification in humid subtropical regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20717\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免耕(NT)可减轻农业生产对环境质量的不利影响、改善土壤健康并减少温室气体排放,但这一点尚未在亚热带湿润的密西西比州得到证实。研究目标是通过土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)评估邓迪淤泥质壤土上玉米(Zea mays L.)(2008-2018 年)和大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr.](2019-2022 年)连续管理 15 年后的养分和碳动态以及土壤质量。15 年后,新界土壤有机碳(SOC)储量(0 至 30 厘米深度)比常规耕作(CT)高出 25%。2020 年至 2022 年期间,新界耕作下的土壤有机碳储量增加了 3 兆克/公顷,而传统耕作下的土壤有机碳储量减少了 2 兆克/公顷。随着碳市场的扩大,NT 条件下 SOC 留存量的增加可能是提高系统盈利能力的一个机会。与 CT(66%)相比,NT(71%)下 SMAF 土壤质量指数(SQI)的 SOC 和聚合度得分更高,这强调了有机质在管理型农业系统的土壤功能中的关键作用。大豆产量与 SMAF SQI 无关(p > 0.05),这表明作物产量主要受非地形因素(如极端气候)的影响。SMAF 显示了新界对 SOC 固碳和土壤健康的积极影响,这可能会促进密西西比河下游流域将其作为一种保护实践。因此,NT 是一种气候智能管理方法,可在亚热带湿润地区实现可持续集约化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

No-till impacts on soil organic carbon and soil quality in the Lower Mississippi River basin: Implications for sustainable management

No-till impacts on soil organic carbon and soil quality in the Lower Mississippi River basin: Implications for sustainable management

No-till (NT) alleviates adverse effects of agricultural production on environmental quality, improves soil health, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, yet this has not been demonstrated in humid subtropical Mississippi. Research objectives were to evaluate nutrient and C dynamics and soil quality via Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) following 15 years of continuous management under corn (Zea mays L.) (2008–2018) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (2019–2022) on a Dundee silt loam soil. After 15 years, soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks (0- to 30-cm depth) under NT were 25% higher than conventional tillage (CT). Between 2020 and 2022, SOC stocks increased 3 Mg ha−1 under NT and decreased 2 Mg ha−1 under CT. Increased SOC retention under NT could represent an opportunity for increasing the systems’ profitability as C markets expand. Greater SOC and aggregation scores improved SMAF soil quality index (SQI) under NT (71%), compared to CT (66%), underscoring the critical role of organic matter in soil functioning in managed agrosystems. Soybean yields were not linked to SMAF SQI (p > 0.05), suggesting that crop yields are mostly affected by non-edaphic factors (e.g., climate extremes). SMAF illustrated positive impacts of NT on SOC sequestration and soil health, which may foster its adoption as a conservation practice in the Lower Mississippi River basin. As such, NT stands as a climate-smart management practice that allows for sustainable intensification in humid subtropical regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信