介壳虫菌株和鹰嘴豆品种驱动植物生长和拔节的表型可塑性

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Nasir Iqbal, Yi Zhou, Matthew D. Denton, Victor O. Sadras
{"title":"介壳虫菌株和鹰嘴豆品种驱动植物生长和拔节的表型可塑性","authors":"Nasir Iqbal, Yi Zhou, Matthew D. Denton, Victor O. Sadras","doi":"10.1007/s10725-024-01177-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i>) establishes symbiotic relationships with several <i>Mesorhizobium</i> species and the three-way interaction between chickpea variety, M<i>esorhizobium</i> strain, and environment, drives plant growth and nitrogen fixation. Here we quantified the phenotypic plasticity for shoot dry weight, nodule dry weight, nodules per plant, nodule colour, symbiotic effectiveness, and nitrogen cost in a factorial experiment combining five chickpea varieties, seven <i>Mesorhizobium</i> strains and three photothermal regimes. Plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits varied with variety, <i>Mesorhizobium</i> strain, photothermal environment and their interaction. Phenotypic plasticity was larger for nodules per plant (7.3-fold) than for shoot dry weight (2.7-fold), verifying a hierarchy of plasticities between these traits. Strain-driven plasticity of plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits was larger than variety-driven plasticity for our combination of varieties, strains, and photothermal environments, with strain-driven phenotypic plasticity being 2.7-fold vs 1.4-fold for shoot dry matter, 2.5-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule dry weight, 7.3-fold vs 2.1-fold for nodules per plant, 3.7-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule color, 2.9-fold vs 1.6-fold for symbiotic effectiveness, and 2.3-fold vs 1.6-fold for nitrogen cost. Our study provides insights on the phenotypic plasticity of the legume-rhizobia interaction by considering the plants as part of the rhizobia environment and vice-versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":20412,"journal":{"name":"Plant Growth Regulation","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesorhizobia strain and chickpea variety drive phenotypic plasticity of plant growth and nodulation\",\"authors\":\"Nasir Iqbal, Yi Zhou, Matthew D. Denton, Victor O. Sadras\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10725-024-01177-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i>) establishes symbiotic relationships with several <i>Mesorhizobium</i> species and the three-way interaction between chickpea variety, M<i>esorhizobium</i> strain, and environment, drives plant growth and nitrogen fixation. Here we quantified the phenotypic plasticity for shoot dry weight, nodule dry weight, nodules per plant, nodule colour, symbiotic effectiveness, and nitrogen cost in a factorial experiment combining five chickpea varieties, seven <i>Mesorhizobium</i> strains and three photothermal regimes. Plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits varied with variety, <i>Mesorhizobium</i> strain, photothermal environment and their interaction. Phenotypic plasticity was larger for nodules per plant (7.3-fold) than for shoot dry weight (2.7-fold), verifying a hierarchy of plasticities between these traits. Strain-driven plasticity of plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits was larger than variety-driven plasticity for our combination of varieties, strains, and photothermal environments, with strain-driven phenotypic plasticity being 2.7-fold vs 1.4-fold for shoot dry matter, 2.5-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule dry weight, 7.3-fold vs 2.1-fold for nodules per plant, 3.7-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule color, 2.9-fold vs 1.6-fold for symbiotic effectiveness, and 2.3-fold vs 1.6-fold for nitrogen cost. Our study provides insights on the phenotypic plasticity of the legume-rhizobia interaction by considering the plants as part of the rhizobia environment and vice-versa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Growth Regulation\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Growth Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01177-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Growth Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01177-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)与多种中生孢子菌建立了共生关系,鹰嘴豆品种、中生孢子菌菌株和环境三者之间的相互作用推动了植物的生长和固氮作用。在这里,我们结合五个鹰嘴豆品种、七个介壳虫菌株和三种光热制度,通过因子实验量化了芽干重、结节干重、单株结节、结节颜色、共生效果和氮成本的表型可塑性。植物生长和固氮特性随品种、中生孢子菌菌株、光热环境及其相互作用而变化。每株结瘤的表型可塑性(7.3 倍)大于芽干重(2.7 倍),验证了这些性状之间的可塑性层次。在我们的品种、菌株和光热环境组合中,菌株驱动的植物生长和固氮性状的可塑性大于品种驱动的可塑性。菌株驱动的表型可塑性分别为:芽干物质 2.7 倍对 1.4 倍、结核干重 2.5 倍对 1.7 倍、单株结核 7.3 倍对 2.1 倍、结核颜色 3.7 倍对 1.7 倍、共生效率 2.9 倍对 1.6 倍、氮成本 2.3 倍对 1.6 倍。我们的研究将植物视为根瘤菌环境的一部分,反之亦然,从而为豆科植物与根瘤菌相互作用的表型可塑性提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mesorhizobia strain and chickpea variety drive phenotypic plasticity of plant growth and nodulation

Mesorhizobia strain and chickpea variety drive phenotypic plasticity of plant growth and nodulation

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) establishes symbiotic relationships with several Mesorhizobium species and the three-way interaction between chickpea variety, Mesorhizobium strain, and environment, drives plant growth and nitrogen fixation. Here we quantified the phenotypic plasticity for shoot dry weight, nodule dry weight, nodules per plant, nodule colour, symbiotic effectiveness, and nitrogen cost in a factorial experiment combining five chickpea varieties, seven Mesorhizobium strains and three photothermal regimes. Plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits varied with variety, Mesorhizobium strain, photothermal environment and their interaction. Phenotypic plasticity was larger for nodules per plant (7.3-fold) than for shoot dry weight (2.7-fold), verifying a hierarchy of plasticities between these traits. Strain-driven plasticity of plant growth and nitrogen fixation traits was larger than variety-driven plasticity for our combination of varieties, strains, and photothermal environments, with strain-driven phenotypic plasticity being 2.7-fold vs 1.4-fold for shoot dry matter, 2.5-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule dry weight, 7.3-fold vs 2.1-fold for nodules per plant, 3.7-fold vs 1.7-fold for nodule color, 2.9-fold vs 1.6-fold for symbiotic effectiveness, and 2.3-fold vs 1.6-fold for nitrogen cost. Our study provides insights on the phenotypic plasticity of the legume-rhizobia interaction by considering the plants as part of the rhizobia environment and vice-versa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Growth Regulation
Plant Growth Regulation 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant Growth Regulation is an international journal publishing original articles on all aspects of plant growth and development. We welcome manuscripts reporting question-based research using hormonal, physiological, environmental, genetical, biophysical, developmental or molecular approaches to the study of plant growth regulation. Emphasis is placed on papers presenting the results of original research. Occasional reviews on important topics will also be welcome. All contributions must be in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信