评估在溪流生态系统稳定同位素研究中确定营养位置估算最佳基线的标准化方法

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Nathan T. Barrus, Bryan M. Maitland, Frank J. Rahel
{"title":"评估在溪流生态系统稳定同位素研究中确定营养位置估算最佳基线的标准化方法","authors":"Nathan T. Barrus, Bryan M. Maitland, Frank J. Rahel","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05618-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ<sup>15</sup>N) are widely used to quantify trophic position in aquatic ecosystems. Comparing trophic position across space requires identifying baselines to account for variation in δ<sup>15</sup>N values of basal energy resources, but few standardized methods exist for identifying suitable baselines. We evaluated a standardized method for identifying optimal isotopic baselines in streams spanning the Rocky Mountains–Great Plains ecotone. We assessed candidate taxonomic groups and feeding groups following four criteria: (1) Organisms should be easy to collect and widely distributed, (2) Within-site δ<sup>15</sup>N variation should be low (representative of uniform feeding behavior), (3) δ<sup>15</sup>N values should be correlated with geographic variability in δ<sup>15</sup>N values, and (4) Trophic position of consumers calculated using the baseline should be independent of geographic δ<sup>15</sup>N variability when there is no change in diet. Simuliidae (obligate, sestonic filter feeders) met all four criteria for four fishes and produced trophic position estimates consistent with dietary changes for brown trout along a longitudinal stream gradient. The four-criteria screening method is suitable for temperate streams in North America and supports the recommendation to use Simuliidae or potentially grouped filter feeders as baseline organisms for stable isotope studies quantifying trophic position in higher-order consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13147,"journal":{"name":"Hydrobiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing a standardized method to identify optimal baselines for trophic position estimation in stable isotope studies of stream ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Nathan T. Barrus, Bryan M. Maitland, Frank J. Rahel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10750-024-05618-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ<sup>15</sup>N) are widely used to quantify trophic position in aquatic ecosystems. Comparing trophic position across space requires identifying baselines to account for variation in δ<sup>15</sup>N values of basal energy resources, but few standardized methods exist for identifying suitable baselines. We evaluated a standardized method for identifying optimal isotopic baselines in streams spanning the Rocky Mountains–Great Plains ecotone. We assessed candidate taxonomic groups and feeding groups following four criteria: (1) Organisms should be easy to collect and widely distributed, (2) Within-site δ<sup>15</sup>N variation should be low (representative of uniform feeding behavior), (3) δ<sup>15</sup>N values should be correlated with geographic variability in δ<sup>15</sup>N values, and (4) Trophic position of consumers calculated using the baseline should be independent of geographic δ<sup>15</sup>N variability when there is no change in diet. Simuliidae (obligate, sestonic filter feeders) met all four criteria for four fishes and produced trophic position estimates consistent with dietary changes for brown trout along a longitudinal stream gradient. The four-criteria screening method is suitable for temperate streams in North America and supports the recommendation to use Simuliidae or potentially grouped filter feeders as baseline organisms for stable isotope studies quantifying trophic position in higher-order consumers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05618-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05618-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氮稳定同位素比值(δ15N)被广泛用于量化水生生态系统中的营养位置。比较不同空间的营养位置需要确定基线,以考虑基质能量资源δ15N 值的变化,但目前很少有标准化方法来确定合适的基线。我们对一种标准化方法进行了评估,该方法可用于确定横跨落基山-大平原生态区的溪流中的最佳同位素基线。我们按照四个标准评估了候选分类群和摄食群:(1)生物应易于采集且分布广泛;(2)同一地点内δ15N的变异应较小(代表统一的摄食行为);(3)δ15N值应与δ15N值的地理变异相关;以及(4)当食物没有变化时,利用基线计算的消费者营养位置应与地理δ15N变异无关。对四种鱼类而言,蚋科(强制性、有节滤食者)符合所有四项标准,其营养位置估计值与褐鳟沿溪流纵向梯度的食性变化一致。四项标准筛选方法适用于北美温带溪流,并支持将蚋科或潜在的滤食者作为稳定同位素研究的基线生物的建议,以量化高阶消费者的营养位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing a standardized method to identify optimal baselines for trophic position estimation in stable isotope studies of stream ecosystems

Assessing a standardized method to identify optimal baselines for trophic position estimation in stable isotope studies of stream ecosystems

Nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ15N) are widely used to quantify trophic position in aquatic ecosystems. Comparing trophic position across space requires identifying baselines to account for variation in δ15N values of basal energy resources, but few standardized methods exist for identifying suitable baselines. We evaluated a standardized method for identifying optimal isotopic baselines in streams spanning the Rocky Mountains–Great Plains ecotone. We assessed candidate taxonomic groups and feeding groups following four criteria: (1) Organisms should be easy to collect and widely distributed, (2) Within-site δ15N variation should be low (representative of uniform feeding behavior), (3) δ15N values should be correlated with geographic variability in δ15N values, and (4) Trophic position of consumers calculated using the baseline should be independent of geographic δ15N variability when there is no change in diet. Simuliidae (obligate, sestonic filter feeders) met all four criteria for four fishes and produced trophic position estimates consistent with dietary changes for brown trout along a longitudinal stream gradient. The four-criteria screening method is suitable for temperate streams in North America and supports the recommendation to use Simuliidae or potentially grouped filter feeders as baseline organisms for stable isotope studies quantifying trophic position in higher-order consumers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrobiologia
Hydrobiologia 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Hydrobiologia publishes original research, reviews and opinions regarding the biology of all aquatic environments, including the impact of human activities. We welcome molecular-, organism-, community- and ecosystem-level studies in contributions dealing with limnology and oceanography, including systematics and aquatic ecology. Hypothesis-driven experimental research is preferred, but also theoretical papers or articles with large descriptive content will be considered, provided they are made relevant to a broad hydrobiological audience. Applied aspects will be considered if firmly embedded in an ecological context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信