情绪可塑性信念与自杀意念或行为之间的关系

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kailyn Fan, Chloe Hudson, Hans Schroder, Elizabeth Kneeland, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Björgvinsson
{"title":"情绪可塑性信念与自杀意念或行为之间的关系","authors":"Kailyn Fan, Chloe Hudson, Hans Schroder, Elizabeth Kneeland, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Björgvinsson","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Research has identified risk factors for suicide, but resilience factors remain unexplored. Our study examined whether stronger emotion malleability beliefs may protect against suicidal ideation (SI) and/or behaviors. We also examined whether emotion malleability beliefs moderates the relation between SI and suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 514 partial hospital patients) completed the Theories of Emotion Scale that assessed emotion malleability beliefs and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview to measure SI severity and presence of suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Consistent with hypotheses, stronger emotion malleability beliefs was associated with lower levels of past-month SI (β = – .12, <i>p</i> = .009) and lower odds of past-month suicidal behaviors (Exp[<i>B</i>] = 1.06, <i>p</i> = .009). However, these effects were no longer significant when controlling for depressive symptoms (β = – .05, <i>p</i> = .29; Exp[<i>B</i>] = 0.85, <i>p</i> = .11). Unexpectedly, past-month SI was a stronger predictor of past-month suicidal behavior at stronger emotion malleability beliefs (<i>b</i> = .87, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) relative to more moderate (<i>b</i> = .65, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) or weaker beliefs (<i>b</i> = .51, <i>p</i> &lt; .001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Emotion malleability beliefs does not predict suicidality beyond depressive symptoms, but paradoxically may increase risk of suicidal thoughts progressing into suicidal behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Kailyn Fan, Chloe Hudson, Hans Schroder, Elizabeth Kneeland, Courtney Beard, Thröstur Björgvinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Research has identified risk factors for suicide, but resilience factors remain unexplored. Our study examined whether stronger emotion malleability beliefs may protect against suicidal ideation (SI) and/or behaviors. We also examined whether emotion malleability beliefs moderates the relation between SI and suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 514 partial hospital patients) completed the Theories of Emotion Scale that assessed emotion malleability beliefs and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview to measure SI severity and presence of suicidal behaviors.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Consistent with hypotheses, stronger emotion malleability beliefs was associated with lower levels of past-month SI (β = – .12, <i>p</i> = .009) and lower odds of past-month suicidal behaviors (Exp[<i>B</i>] = 1.06, <i>p</i> = .009). However, these effects were no longer significant when controlling for depressive symptoms (β = – .05, <i>p</i> = .29; Exp[<i>B</i>] = 0.85, <i>p</i> = .11). Unexpectedly, past-month SI was a stronger predictor of past-month suicidal behavior at stronger emotion malleability beliefs (<i>b</i> = .87, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) relative to more moderate (<i>b</i> = .65, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) or weaker beliefs (<i>b</i> = .51, <i>p</i> &lt; .001).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Emotion malleability beliefs does not predict suicidality beyond depressive symptoms, but paradoxically may increase risk of suicidal thoughts progressing into suicidal behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10498-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:研究发现了自杀的风险因素,但复原力因素仍未得到探讨。我们的研究探讨了较强的情绪可塑性信念是否可以防止自杀意念(SI)和/或行为。我们还研究了情绪可塑性信念是否会调节 SI 与自杀行为之间的关系。方法参与者(n = 514 名部分住院患者)完成了评估情绪可塑性信念的情绪理论量表和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表访谈,以测量 SI 的严重程度和是否存在自杀行为。结果与假设一致,较强的情绪可塑性信念与较低的上月SI水平(β = - .12,p = .009)和较低的上月自杀行为几率(Exp[B] = 1.06,p = .009)相关。然而,在控制抑郁症状后,这些影响不再显著(β = - .05,p = .29;Exp[B] = 0.85,p = .11)。意想不到的是,相对于较温和的信念(b = .65,p = .001)或较弱的信念(b = .51,p = .001),较强的情绪可塑性信念(b = .87,p = .001)对上个月的自杀行为有更强的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors

The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors

Purpose

Research has identified risk factors for suicide, but resilience factors remain unexplored. Our study examined whether stronger emotion malleability beliefs may protect against suicidal ideation (SI) and/or behaviors. We also examined whether emotion malleability beliefs moderates the relation between SI and suicidal behaviors.

Method

Participants (n = 514 partial hospital patients) completed the Theories of Emotion Scale that assessed emotion malleability beliefs and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview to measure SI severity and presence of suicidal behaviors.

Results

Consistent with hypotheses, stronger emotion malleability beliefs was associated with lower levels of past-month SI (β = – .12, p = .009) and lower odds of past-month suicidal behaviors (Exp[B] = 1.06, p = .009). However, these effects were no longer significant when controlling for depressive symptoms (β = – .05, p = .29; Exp[B] = 0.85, p = .11). Unexpectedly, past-month SI was a stronger predictor of past-month suicidal behavior at stronger emotion malleability beliefs (b = .87, p < .001) relative to more moderate (b = .65, p < .001) or weaker beliefs (b = .51, p < .001).

Conclusion

Emotion malleability beliefs does not predict suicidality beyond depressive symptoms, but paradoxically may increase risk of suicidal thoughts progressing into suicidal behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信