COVID-19 是否引发了重新分配浪潮?

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Economica Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/ecca.12538
Agostino Consolo, Filippos Petroulakis
{"title":"COVID-19 是否引发了重新分配浪潮?","authors":"Agostino Consolo,&nbsp;Filippos Petroulakis","doi":"10.1111/ecca.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We critically examine the hypothesis that COVID-19 has ushered in a large reallocation shock in the USA, beyond typical business cycle patterns. We take a broad perspective, and first consider data from the CPS and JOLTS; there is no noticeable uptick in occupation or sector switches, either at the aggregate level or in the cross-section. The dispersion of sectoral growth rates over the three years before the pandemic was similar to the previous period. The recovery from the initial shock was characterized by very high quits and low layoffs, patterns indicative of a strong labour market, not excessively high reallocation relative to previous business cycles. High growth of small employers in the recovery, and larger ones once the labour market tightened, is also a common cyclical pattern. We then examine whether mismatch unemployment rose as a result of the pandemic; using an off-the-shelf multisector search and matching model, there is little evidence for an important role for mismatch in driving the unemployment rate during the pandemic. Finally, we employ a novel Bayesian Structural Vector Autoregression framework with sign restrictions to identify a reallocation shock; we find that it has played a relatively minor role in explaining labour market patterns in the pandemic, at least relative to earlier episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48040,"journal":{"name":"Economica","volume":"91 364","pages":"1349-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did COVID-19 induce a reallocation wave?\",\"authors\":\"Agostino Consolo,&nbsp;Filippos Petroulakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecca.12538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We critically examine the hypothesis that COVID-19 has ushered in a large reallocation shock in the USA, beyond typical business cycle patterns. We take a broad perspective, and first consider data from the CPS and JOLTS; there is no noticeable uptick in occupation or sector switches, either at the aggregate level or in the cross-section. The dispersion of sectoral growth rates over the three years before the pandemic was similar to the previous period. The recovery from the initial shock was characterized by very high quits and low layoffs, patterns indicative of a strong labour market, not excessively high reallocation relative to previous business cycles. High growth of small employers in the recovery, and larger ones once the labour market tightened, is also a common cyclical pattern. We then examine whether mismatch unemployment rose as a result of the pandemic; using an off-the-shelf multisector search and matching model, there is little evidence for an important role for mismatch in driving the unemployment rate during the pandemic. Finally, we employ a novel Bayesian Structural Vector Autoregression framework with sign restrictions to identify a reallocation shock; we find that it has played a relatively minor role in explaining labour market patterns in the pandemic, at least relative to earlier episodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economica\",\"volume\":\"91 364\",\"pages\":\"1349-1390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.12538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.12538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对 "COVID-19 在美国带来了巨大的重新分配冲击 "这一假设进行了批判性研究,它超越了典型的商业周期模式。我们从广阔的视角出发,首先考虑来自 CPS 和 JOLTS 的数据;无论是在总体水平上还是在横截面上,职业或行业转换都没有明显的上升。在大流行病发生前的三年里,各部门增长率的分散情况与前一时期相似。从最初的冲击中复苏的特点是高辞职率和低裁员率,这种模式表明劳动力市场强劲,而不是与以往的商业周期相比重新分配过多。在复苏过程中,小雇主的高增长,以及一旦劳动力市场收紧,雇主规模的扩大,也是一种常见的周期模式。然后,我们研究了错配失业率是否因大流行病而上升;使用现成的多部门搜索和匹配模型,几乎没有证据表明错配在推动大流行病期间的失业率方面发挥了重要作用。最后,我们采用了一种新颖的贝叶斯结构向量自回归框架,并对符号进行了限制,以确定重新分配冲击;我们发现,在解释大流行病期间的劳动力市场模式方面,重新分配冲击所起的作用相对较小,至少相对于早期的大流行病而言是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Did COVID-19 induce a reallocation wave?

We critically examine the hypothesis that COVID-19 has ushered in a large reallocation shock in the USA, beyond typical business cycle patterns. We take a broad perspective, and first consider data from the CPS and JOLTS; there is no noticeable uptick in occupation or sector switches, either at the aggregate level or in the cross-section. The dispersion of sectoral growth rates over the three years before the pandemic was similar to the previous period. The recovery from the initial shock was characterized by very high quits and low layoffs, patterns indicative of a strong labour market, not excessively high reallocation relative to previous business cycles. High growth of small employers in the recovery, and larger ones once the labour market tightened, is also a common cyclical pattern. We then examine whether mismatch unemployment rose as a result of the pandemic; using an off-the-shelf multisector search and matching model, there is little evidence for an important role for mismatch in driving the unemployment rate during the pandemic. Finally, we employ a novel Bayesian Structural Vector Autoregression framework with sign restrictions to identify a reallocation shock; we find that it has played a relatively minor role in explaining labour market patterns in the pandemic, at least relative to earlier episodes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economica
Economica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Economica is an international journal devoted to research in all branches of economics. Theoretical and empirical articles are welcome from all parts of the international research community. Economica is a leading economics journal, appearing high in the published citation rankings. In addition to the main papers which make up each issue, there is an extensive review section, covering a wide range of recently published titles at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信