更新近视激光视力矫正后眼内透镜功率计算中的无历史记录法

H. John Shammas, David L. Cooke, Kamran M. Riaz, Rahul Tonk, Maya C. Shammas, Adam Bleeker, Abdelrahman M. Anter, Sanjana Suraneni, Sebastian Leal
{"title":"更新近视激光视力矫正后眼内透镜功率计算中的无历史记录法","authors":"H. John Shammas, David L. Cooke, Kamran M. Riaz, Rahul Tonk, Maya C. Shammas, Adam Bleeker, Abdelrahman M. Anter, Sanjana Suraneni, Sebastian Leal","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results to the Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH formulas. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; and private practice, Lynwood, California, USA and St Joseph, Michigan, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We analyzed two large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the novel Shammas-Cooke formula, and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula to three other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. RESULTS: Mean prediction error was 0.09±0.56, -0.44±0.61, -0.47±0.59 and -0.18±0.56 D, and the mean absolute error was 0.43, 0.60, 0.61 and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D was 66.7% versus 47.9%, 48.5% and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P<0.001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P=0.923).","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updating the No-History Method in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Myopic Laser Vision Correction\",\"authors\":\"H. John Shammas, David L. Cooke, Kamran M. Riaz, Rahul Tonk, Maya C. Shammas, Adam Bleeker, Abdelrahman M. Anter, Sanjana Suraneni, Sebastian Leal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results to the Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH formulas. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; and private practice, Lynwood, California, USA and St Joseph, Michigan, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We analyzed two large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the novel Shammas-Cooke formula, and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula to three other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. RESULTS: Mean prediction error was 0.09±0.56, -0.44±0.61, -0.47±0.59 and -0.18±0.56 D, and the mean absolute error was 0.43, 0.60, 0.61 and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D was 66.7% versus 47.9%, 48.5% and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P<0.001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P=0.923).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 描述 Shammas-Cooke 公式,这是一种用于近视激光视力矫正 (M-LVC) 眼人工晶体计算的最新无历史 (NH) 公式,并将结果与 Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH 公式进行比较。设置:美国佛罗里达州迈阿密市迈阿密大学伦纳基金会医疗中心巴斯科姆-帕尔默眼科研究所(BPEI);美国俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马大学迪安-麦基眼科研究所(DMEI);美国加利福尼亚州林伍德和美国密歇根州圣约瑟夫的私人诊所。设计:回顾性观察研究。方法:我们分析了两组曾接受过 M-LVC 的大型白内障眼。训练集(BPEI 系列的 330 只眼睛)用于推导新型 Shammas-Cooke 公式中使用的新角膜力转换方程,测试集(DMEI 系列 165 名患者的 165 只眼睛)用于将更新后的公式与 ASCRS 计算器中的其他三个 M-LVC NH 公式进行比较:Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH。结果:Shammas-Cooke、Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH 的平均预测误差分别为 0.09±0.56、-0.44±0.61、-0.47±0.59 和 -0.18±0.56 D,平均绝对误差分别为 0.43、0.60、0.61 和 0.45 D。±0.50D以内的眼睛比例分别为66.7%对47.9%、48.5%和65.5%。结论:Shammas-Cooke 公式的性能优于 Shammas PL 和 Haigis-L(P<0.001),也优于 Barrett True-K NH 公式(P=0.923)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updating the No-History Method in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Myopic Laser Vision Correction
PURPOSE: To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results to the Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH formulas. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; and private practice, Lynwood, California, USA and St Joseph, Michigan, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We analyzed two large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the novel Shammas-Cooke formula, and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula to three other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. RESULTS: Mean prediction error was 0.09±0.56, -0.44±0.61, -0.47±0.59 and -0.18±0.56 D, and the mean absolute error was 0.43, 0.60, 0.61 and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D was 66.7% versus 47.9%, 48.5% and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P<0.001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P=0.923).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信