Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Lateral Versus Medial Approach in the Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Valgus knee deformity poses great challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and requires precision in balancing of soft tissue and implant component positioning. The surgical approach used for TKA has a determinantal impact on intraoperative soft tissue balancing, postoperative knee function, and complications. We executed a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature, which included a maximum number of studies with quantitative analysis of all possible outcomes to substantiate the current evidence of the advantage of lateral versus medial approach in TKA for valgus knee deformity.

Methodology

We performed a meticulous primary electronic search across PubMed, Emabse, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, and looked for the comparative studies that evaluated the medial versus lateral approach in TKA for valgus knees. Statistical analyses were executed with RevMan-5.4.1.

Results

On the evaluation of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two prospective and five retrospective comparative studies, our analysis revealed a better functional outcome in terms of Knee Society Score [MD 2.24, 95% CI 0.42, 4.05; p = 0.02] with the medial approach. However, comparable results were observed for two approaches with regard to Knee Society Function [MD 0.69, 95% CI − 1.77, 3.15; p = 0.58], knee flexion range of motion (ROM) [MD 3.30, 95% CI − 1.34, 7.95; p = 0.16], overall complications [OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.27,1.34; p = 0.22], wound-related complications, infection, nerve injury, periprosthetic fracture, post-operative valgus, blood loss, duration of surgery, postoperative pain, and patellar tilt for TKA in valgus knee.

Conclusion

Evidence from the currently available published data suggests that the lateral approach, compared to the medial approach in TKA for the valgus knee, does not show clear superiority.