基于分析模型和以往地震的经验数据,利用新一代烈度测量方法,为非导性填充钢筋混凝土建筑提供脆性函数

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh, Gerard J. O’Reilly
{"title":"基于分析模型和以往地震的经验数据,利用新一代烈度测量方法,为非导性填充钢筋混凝土建筑提供脆性函数","authors":"Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh,&nbsp;Gerard J. O’Reilly","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01955-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The regional seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) building portfolios is a critical issue in earthquake engineering due to their high vulnerability and widespread distribution in seismic prone areas. A pertinent aspect in regional seismic risk applications is the ability to accurately quantify the exceedance of any damage state, generally via fragility functions. To this end, this study derives analytical fragility functions for large-scale seismic risk applications of non-ductile RC buildings with masonry infills characteristic of the Italian peninsula and Southern Europe in general. These were derived using a large database of archetype buildings developed to represent the temporal evolution in construction practice in Italy based on an extensive literature review and interviews with practising engineers and architects. Fragility functions for several infilled RC taxonomy classes were derived for multiple damage states using state-of-the-art analysis on detailed numerical models. Average spectral acceleration was adopted as the intensity measure throughout, since it has been shown to notably reduce dispersion and bias in quantifying the response, and subsequently refine the seismic risk estimates, for these typologies. The fragility functions are compared against empirical data collected following past earthquakes in Italy, namely L’Aquila 2009 and Umbria-Marche 1997. The development of empirical fragility functions was carried out using a novel derivation of average spectral acceleration-based ground-motion fields considering spatial and cross-period correlation models, which is a key component and development in this study. This paper shows how recent advances in analytical fragility function development can be integrated with past empirical observations to give more accurate and representative damage estimates for regional assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 10","pages":"4983 - 5021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragility functions for non-ductile infilled reinforced concrete buildings using next-generation intensity measures based on analytical models and empirical data from past earthquakes\",\"authors\":\"Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh,&nbsp;Gerard J. O’Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-01955-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The regional seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) building portfolios is a critical issue in earthquake engineering due to their high vulnerability and widespread distribution in seismic prone areas. A pertinent aspect in regional seismic risk applications is the ability to accurately quantify the exceedance of any damage state, generally via fragility functions. To this end, this study derives analytical fragility functions for large-scale seismic risk applications of non-ductile RC buildings with masonry infills characteristic of the Italian peninsula and Southern Europe in general. These were derived using a large database of archetype buildings developed to represent the temporal evolution in construction practice in Italy based on an extensive literature review and interviews with practising engineers and architects. Fragility functions for several infilled RC taxonomy classes were derived for multiple damage states using state-of-the-art analysis on detailed numerical models. Average spectral acceleration was adopted as the intensity measure throughout, since it has been shown to notably reduce dispersion and bias in quantifying the response, and subsequently refine the seismic risk estimates, for these typologies. The fragility functions are compared against empirical data collected following past earthquakes in Italy, namely L’Aquila 2009 and Umbria-Marche 1997. The development of empirical fragility functions was carried out using a novel derivation of average spectral acceleration-based ground-motion fields considering spatial and cross-period correlation models, which is a key component and development in this study. This paper shows how recent advances in analytical fragility function development can be integrated with past empirical observations to give more accurate and representative damage estimates for regional assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 10\",\"pages\":\"4983 - 5021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01955-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01955-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑组合的区域地震风险评估是地震工程中的一个关键问题,因为它们具有高度脆弱性,而且广泛分布在地震易发地区。区域地震风险应用的一个相关方面是,通常通过脆性函数对任何破坏状态的超限进行精确量化的能力。为此,本研究针对意大利半岛和整个南欧特有的砌体填充非韧性 RC 建筑的大规模地震风险应用,推导出了分析脆度函数。这些脆性函数是利用一个大型原型建筑数据库推导出来的,该数据库是在广泛的文献综述以及对执业工程师和建筑师的访谈基础上开发的,代表了意大利建筑实践的时间演变。通过对详细的数值模型进行最先进的分析,得出了多个填充式 RC 分类等级的多种破坏状态的脆性函数。平均谱加速度作为烈度度量方法被广泛采用,因为它已被证明能显著减少反应量化过程中的分散性和偏差,进而完善这些类型的地震风险估算。脆度函数与过去意大利地震(即 2009 年拉奎拉地震和 1997 年翁布里亚-马尔凯地震)后收集的经验数据进行了比较。经验脆度函数的开发采用了基于平均频谱加速度的地动场新推导方法,考虑了空间和跨周期相关模型,这是本研究的关键组成部分和开发成果。本文展示了如何将分析脆性函数开发的最新进展与过去的经验观测相结合,为区域评估提供更准确、更有代表性的损害估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fragility functions for non-ductile infilled reinforced concrete buildings using next-generation intensity measures based on analytical models and empirical data from past earthquakes

Fragility functions for non-ductile infilled reinforced concrete buildings using next-generation intensity measures based on analytical models and empirical data from past earthquakes

Fragility functions for non-ductile infilled reinforced concrete buildings using next-generation intensity measures based on analytical models and empirical data from past earthquakes

The regional seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) building portfolios is a critical issue in earthquake engineering due to their high vulnerability and widespread distribution in seismic prone areas. A pertinent aspect in regional seismic risk applications is the ability to accurately quantify the exceedance of any damage state, generally via fragility functions. To this end, this study derives analytical fragility functions for large-scale seismic risk applications of non-ductile RC buildings with masonry infills characteristic of the Italian peninsula and Southern Europe in general. These were derived using a large database of archetype buildings developed to represent the temporal evolution in construction practice in Italy based on an extensive literature review and interviews with practising engineers and architects. Fragility functions for several infilled RC taxonomy classes were derived for multiple damage states using state-of-the-art analysis on detailed numerical models. Average spectral acceleration was adopted as the intensity measure throughout, since it has been shown to notably reduce dispersion and bias in quantifying the response, and subsequently refine the seismic risk estimates, for these typologies. The fragility functions are compared against empirical data collected following past earthquakes in Italy, namely L’Aquila 2009 and Umbria-Marche 1997. The development of empirical fragility functions was carried out using a novel derivation of average spectral acceleration-based ground-motion fields considering spatial and cross-period correlation models, which is a key component and development in this study. This paper shows how recent advances in analytical fragility function development can be integrated with past empirical observations to give more accurate and representative damage estimates for regional assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信