能源是职前教师对放射性概念的来源

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Axel-Thilo Prokop, Ronny Nawrodt
{"title":"能源是职前教师对放射性概念的来源","authors":"Axel-Thilo Prokop, Ronny Nawrodt","doi":"10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although researchers have extensively studied student conceptions of radioactivity, the conceptions held by preservice teachers on this subject are largely absent from the literature. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of problem-centered interviews with preservice teachers (<math display=\"inline\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>13</mn></mrow></math>) to establish which conceptions are held by preservice teachers and to examine these conceptions’ structure in coordination classes. As has already been observed in students, some preservice teachers inadequately differentiate between radioactive matter and ionizing radiation and between fission and decay. We also observed that preservice teachers tend to describe the activation of materials due to ionizing radiation despite having previously denied an activation, thus showing that the conception of activation of materials can reemerge in particular framings. Within the interviews conducted, the concept of energy emerged as a central coordination class regarding radioactivity. This coordination class appeared across contexts and proved fruitful in explaining preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity. We will use the results from this study to develop a teaching-learning laboratory for preservice teachers in which they can actively study high school students’ conceptions while reflecting on their own. In this way, these findings will contribute to improving the structure of nuclear physics courses at the university.","PeriodicalId":54296,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review Physics Education Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy as a source of preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity\",\"authors\":\"Axel-Thilo Prokop, Ronny Nawrodt\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although researchers have extensively studied student conceptions of radioactivity, the conceptions held by preservice teachers on this subject are largely absent from the literature. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of problem-centered interviews with preservice teachers (<math display=\\\"inline\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>13</mn></mrow></math>) to establish which conceptions are held by preservice teachers and to examine these conceptions’ structure in coordination classes. As has already been observed in students, some preservice teachers inadequately differentiate between radioactive matter and ionizing radiation and between fission and decay. We also observed that preservice teachers tend to describe the activation of materials due to ionizing radiation despite having previously denied an activation, thus showing that the conception of activation of materials can reemerge in particular framings. Within the interviews conducted, the concept of energy emerged as a central coordination class regarding radioactivity. This coordination class appeared across contexts and proved fruitful in explaining preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity. We will use the results from this study to develop a teaching-learning laboratory for preservice teachers in which they can actively study high school students’ conceptions while reflecting on their own. In this way, these findings will contribute to improving the structure of nuclear physics courses at the university.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review Physics Education Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review Physics Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review Physics Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管研究人员对学生关于放射性的概念进行了广泛的研究,但文献中基本上没有关于职前教师对这一主题所持概念的研究。我们以问题为中心,对职前教师(13 人)的访谈内容进行了定性分析,以确定职前教师持有哪些概念,并研究这些概念在协调课堂中的结构。正如在学生身上已经观察到的那样,一些职前教师对放射性物质和电离辐射以及裂变和衰变之间的区别认识不足。我们还观察到,在职教师倾向于描述电离辐射导致的物质活化,尽管他们以前曾否认过活化,这表明物质活化的概念可以在特定的框架中重新出现。在所进行的访谈中,"能量 "概念成为有关放射性的核心协调类。这一协调类出现在不同的情境中,在解释职前教师对放射性的概念时证明是卓有成效的。我们将利用这项研究的结果,为职前教师开发一个教学实验室,让他们在反思自己的观念的同时,积极研究高中学生的观念。通过这种方式,这些研究结果将有助于改善大学核物理课程的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Energy as a source of preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity

Energy as a source of preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity
Although researchers have extensively studied student conceptions of radioactivity, the conceptions held by preservice teachers on this subject are largely absent from the literature. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of problem-centered interviews with preservice teachers (N=13) to establish which conceptions are held by preservice teachers and to examine these conceptions’ structure in coordination classes. As has already been observed in students, some preservice teachers inadequately differentiate between radioactive matter and ionizing radiation and between fission and decay. We also observed that preservice teachers tend to describe the activation of materials due to ionizing radiation despite having previously denied an activation, thus showing that the conception of activation of materials can reemerge in particular framings. Within the interviews conducted, the concept of energy emerged as a central coordination class regarding radioactivity. This coordination class appeared across contexts and proved fruitful in explaining preservice teachers’ conceptions about radioactivity. We will use the results from this study to develop a teaching-learning laboratory for preservice teachers in which they can actively study high school students’ conceptions while reflecting on their own. In this way, these findings will contribute to improving the structure of nuclear physics courses at the university.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Physical Review Physics Education Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
41.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: PRPER covers all educational levels, from elementary through graduate education. All topics in experimental and theoretical physics education research are accepted, including, but not limited to: Educational policy Instructional strategies, and materials development Research methodology Epistemology, attitudes, and beliefs Learning environment Scientific reasoning and problem solving Diversity and inclusion Learning theory Student participation Faculty and teacher professional development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信