{"title":"使用交联磷酸化小麦抗性淀粉 4 型的低净碳水化合物烘焙产品","authors":"Tanya Jeradechachai, Clodualdo C. Maningat","doi":"10.1002/cche.10811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectivesLimited information exists regarding the impact of high levels of cross‐linked phosphorylated resistant wheat starch type 4 (RS4) in bakery products. This study aimed to explore the impact of incorporating RS4 (at 64%–83% flour weight) and wheat protein isolate (WPI) in low net carb breads (RS4‐Bread), enzyme crackers (RS4‐Enzyme), and saltine crackers (RS4‐Saltine).FindingsRS4‐Bread had comparable bread quality, loaf volumes, and crumb firmness (Days 0, 1, and 7) as the wheat flour control. The in vitro total dietary fiber analysis of RS4‐Bread yielded a fiber recovery of 90.0%–98.1%, db. RS4‐Enzyme had higher water absorption, longer mixing time, and less elastic dough, but comparable cracker hardness to the control. RS4‐Saltine had a higher water absorption, but lower cracker hardness compared to the control. Fiber recovery of RS4‐Enzyme and RS4‐Saltine crackers were 85.6% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionsAnalytical measurements indicated a significant discrepancy in predicting bake mix time and absorption for RS4‐Bread. This research fills gaps in the understanding of low net carb bread, saltine crackers, and enzyme crackers, providing valuable insights into future product development.Significance and NoveltyCombining RS4 and WPI offers potential for health‐promoting, high‐fiber, low net carb products, applicable in various flour‐based foods.","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low net carbohydrate bakery products using cross‐linked phosphorylated wheat resistant starch type 4\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Jeradechachai, Clodualdo C. Maningat\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cche.10811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and ObjectivesLimited information exists regarding the impact of high levels of cross‐linked phosphorylated resistant wheat starch type 4 (RS4) in bakery products. This study aimed to explore the impact of incorporating RS4 (at 64%–83% flour weight) and wheat protein isolate (WPI) in low net carb breads (RS4‐Bread), enzyme crackers (RS4‐Enzyme), and saltine crackers (RS4‐Saltine).FindingsRS4‐Bread had comparable bread quality, loaf volumes, and crumb firmness (Days 0, 1, and 7) as the wheat flour control. The in vitro total dietary fiber analysis of RS4‐Bread yielded a fiber recovery of 90.0%–98.1%, db. RS4‐Enzyme had higher water absorption, longer mixing time, and less elastic dough, but comparable cracker hardness to the control. RS4‐Saltine had a higher water absorption, but lower cracker hardness compared to the control. Fiber recovery of RS4‐Enzyme and RS4‐Saltine crackers were 85.6% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionsAnalytical measurements indicated a significant discrepancy in predicting bake mix time and absorption for RS4‐Bread. This research fills gaps in the understanding of low net carb bread, saltine crackers, and enzyme crackers, providing valuable insights into future product development.Significance and NoveltyCombining RS4 and WPI offers potential for health‐promoting, high‐fiber, low net carb products, applicable in various flour‐based foods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10811\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low net carbohydrate bakery products using cross‐linked phosphorylated wheat resistant starch type 4
Background and ObjectivesLimited information exists regarding the impact of high levels of cross‐linked phosphorylated resistant wheat starch type 4 (RS4) in bakery products. This study aimed to explore the impact of incorporating RS4 (at 64%–83% flour weight) and wheat protein isolate (WPI) in low net carb breads (RS4‐Bread), enzyme crackers (RS4‐Enzyme), and saltine crackers (RS4‐Saltine).FindingsRS4‐Bread had comparable bread quality, loaf volumes, and crumb firmness (Days 0, 1, and 7) as the wheat flour control. The in vitro total dietary fiber analysis of RS4‐Bread yielded a fiber recovery of 90.0%–98.1%, db. RS4‐Enzyme had higher water absorption, longer mixing time, and less elastic dough, but comparable cracker hardness to the control. RS4‐Saltine had a higher water absorption, but lower cracker hardness compared to the control. Fiber recovery of RS4‐Enzyme and RS4‐Saltine crackers were 85.6% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionsAnalytical measurements indicated a significant discrepancy in predicting bake mix time and absorption for RS4‐Bread. This research fills gaps in the understanding of low net carb bread, saltine crackers, and enzyme crackers, providing valuable insights into future product development.Significance and NoveltyCombining RS4 and WPI offers potential for health‐promoting, high‐fiber, low net carb products, applicable in various flour‐based foods.
期刊介绍:
Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utilization of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oilseeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers.
The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.