探讨犯罪自我效能因素与累犯之间的关系

IF 2.2 2区社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12265

Jamie Ung, Caleb D. Lloyd

{"title":"探讨犯罪自我效能因素与累犯之间的关系","authors":"Jamie Ung, Caleb D. Lloyd","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p><i>Criminal self-efficacy</i>, an antisocial belief representing positive appraisal of one's capabilities to enact crime, is theorized to drive criminal behaviour, but few measures exist. Our aim was to re-validate one measure of criminal self-efficacy by re-testing its ability to predict recidivism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used <i>Criminal Self-efficacy Scale-15</i> scores from 353 people on community corrections orders measured up to three times.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Confirmatory factor analysis revealed three latent factors we called <i>criminal connections</i>, <i>physical violence</i>, and <i>criminal expertise</i>. Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated that only <i>physical violence</i> scores predicted recidivism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The three factors provide a meaningful conceptual basis for future attempts to develop measures of criminal self-efficacy that improve on the limitations of current measures. More broadly, there is a need to understand how specific antisocial beliefs such as criminal self-efficacy are related to criminal behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationships between criminal self-efficacy factors and recidivism\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Ung, Caleb D. Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lcrp.12265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>Criminal self-efficacy</i>, an antisocial belief representing positive appraisal of one's capabilities to enact crime, is theorized to drive criminal behaviour, but few measures exist. Our aim was to re-validate one measure of criminal self-efficacy by re-testing its ability to predict recidivism.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used <i>Criminal Self-efficacy Scale-15</i> scores from 353 people on community corrections orders measured up to three times.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Confirmatory factor analysis revealed three latent factors we called <i>criminal connections</i>, <i>physical violence</i>, and <i>criminal expertise</i>. Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated that only <i>physical violence</i> scores predicted recidivism.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The three factors provide a meaningful conceptual basis for future attempts to develop measures of criminal self-efficacy that improve on the limitations of current measures. More broadly, there is a need to understand how specific antisocial beliefs such as criminal self-efficacy are related to criminal behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12265\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的犯罪自我效能感是一种反社会信念，代表着对自身犯罪能力的积极评价，被认为是犯罪行为的驱动因素，但很少有衡量标准。我们的目的是通过重新测试犯罪自我效能感预测累犯的能力来重新验证犯罪自我效能感的一种测量方法。方法我们使用了 353 名社区矫正对象的犯罪自我效能感量表-15 分数，对其进行了最多三次测量。结论这三个因素为今后尝试开发犯罪自我效能感测量方法提供了一个有意义的概念基础，可以改善现有测量方法的局限性。更广泛地说，有必要了解犯罪自我效能感等特定反社会信念与犯罪行为之间的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Exploring the relationships between criminal self-efficacy factors and recidivism

Purpose

Criminal self-efficacy, an antisocial belief representing positive appraisal of one's capabilities to enact crime, is theorized to drive criminal behaviour, but few measures exist. Our aim was to re-validate one measure of criminal self-efficacy by re-testing its ability to predict recidivism.

Methods

We used Criminal Self-efficacy Scale-15 scores from 353 people on community corrections orders measured up to three times.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis revealed three latent factors we called criminal connections, physical violence, and criminal expertise. Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated that only physical violence scores predicted recidivism.

Conclusions

The three factors provide a meaningful conceptual basis for future attempts to develop measures of criminal self-efficacy that improve on the limitations of current measures. More broadly, there is a need to understand how specific antisocial beliefs such as criminal self-efficacy are related to criminal behaviour.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Legal and Criminological Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.