Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang
{"title":"为多样化智能系统达成术语共识:呼吁合作","authors":"Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.","PeriodicalId":36121,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: Call for collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Brett J. Kagan, Michael Mahlis, Anjali Bhat, Josh Bongard, Victor M. Cole, Phillip Corlett, Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Hartung, Bianca Jupp, Michael Levin, Tamra Lysaght, Nicholas Opie, Adeel Razi, Lena Smirnova, Ian Tennant, Peter Thestrup Wade, Ge Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Innovation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: Call for collaboration
Disagreements about language use are common both between and within fields. Where interests require multidisciplinary collaboration or the field of research has the potential to impact society at large, it becomes critical to minimize these disagreements where possible. The development of diverse intelligent systems, regardless of the substrate (e.g., silicon vs. biology), is a case where both conditions are met. Significant advancements have occurred in the development of technology progressing toward these diverse intelligence systems. Whether progress is silicon based, such as the use of large language models, or through synthetic biology methods, such as the development of organoids, a clear need for a community-based approach to seeking consensus on nomenclature is now vital. Here, we welcome collaboration from the wider scientific community, proposing a pathway forward to achieving this intention, highlighting key terms and fields of relevance, and suggesting potential consensus-making methods to be applied.
期刊介绍:
The Innovation is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to promote scientific application. It publishes cutting-edge research and high-quality reviews in various scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, materials, nanotechnology, biology, translational medicine, geoscience, and engineering. The journal adheres to the peer review and publishing standards of Cell Press journals.
The Innovation is committed to serving scientists and the public. It aims to publish significant advances promptly and provides a transparent exchange platform. The journal also strives to efficiently promote the translation from scientific discovery to technological achievements and rapidly disseminate scientific findings worldwide.
Indexed in the following databases, The Innovation has visibility in Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), PubMed Central, Compendex (previously Ei index), INSPEC, and CABI A&I.