磷胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系结构和内源激素水平的变化

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Jing Xia, Kun Wang, Lili Nan
{"title":"磷胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系结构和内源激素水平的变化","authors":"Jing Xia, Kun Wang, Lili Nan","doi":"10.1007/s10725-024-01173-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To explain changes in plant growth, root architecture, and endogenous hormones of different root-type alfalfa to phosphorus (P) stress (non-stressed control, 1.00 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup> KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, versus P stress treatment, 0.01 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup> KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). We used the sand culture of rhizomatous-rooted <i>Medicago sativa</i> ‘Qingshui’ (QS), tap-rooted <i>M. sativa</i> ‘Longdong’ (LD), and creeping-rooted <i>M.</i> varia ‘Gongnong No. 4’ (GN) to study the performance with contrasting degrees of P tolerance. After 34 days of P stress treatment, values for plant height, leaf area, specific root length, specific surface area, zeatin (ZT) level, and P content were decreased in response to stress treatment. In contrast, the contents of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellin (GA<sub>3</sub>), as well as the root/shoot ratio, total root length, taproot length, root angle, and the number of root tips and lateral roots, increased in the year and next year, respectively. The topological index and fractal dimension (FD) were small, while the fractal abundance (FA) and the average link length were large. The root branching patterns were dichotomous branching. The amplitude of this response of plant biomass, plant height, leaf length, leaf area, root/shoot ratio, total root length, number of root tips, root angle, specific surface area, and FD in GN of the year and next year was much smaller than those in LD and QS under low-P stress. From the point of view, GN was more tolerant than LD and QS under P condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20412,"journal":{"name":"Plant Growth Regulation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in root architecture and endogenous hormone levels in alfalfa under phosphorus stress\",\"authors\":\"Jing Xia, Kun Wang, Lili Nan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10725-024-01173-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To explain changes in plant growth, root architecture, and endogenous hormones of different root-type alfalfa to phosphorus (P) stress (non-stressed control, 1.00 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup> KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, versus P stress treatment, 0.01 mmol·L<sup>−1</sup> KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). We used the sand culture of rhizomatous-rooted <i>Medicago sativa</i> ‘Qingshui’ (QS), tap-rooted <i>M. sativa</i> ‘Longdong’ (LD), and creeping-rooted <i>M.</i> varia ‘Gongnong No. 4’ (GN) to study the performance with contrasting degrees of P tolerance. After 34 days of P stress treatment, values for plant height, leaf area, specific root length, specific surface area, zeatin (ZT) level, and P content were decreased in response to stress treatment. In contrast, the contents of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellin (GA<sub>3</sub>), as well as the root/shoot ratio, total root length, taproot length, root angle, and the number of root tips and lateral roots, increased in the year and next year, respectively. The topological index and fractal dimension (FD) were small, while the fractal abundance (FA) and the average link length were large. The root branching patterns were dichotomous branching. The amplitude of this response of plant biomass, plant height, leaf length, leaf area, root/shoot ratio, total root length, number of root tips, root angle, specific surface area, and FD in GN of the year and next year was much smaller than those in LD and QS under low-P stress. From the point of view, GN was more tolerant than LD and QS under P condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Growth Regulation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Growth Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01173-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Growth Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01173-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解释不同根型紫花苜蓿在磷胁迫(无胁迫对照,1.00 mmol-L-1 KH2PO4,与磷胁迫处理,0.01 mmol-L-1 KH2PO4)下植物生长、根系结构和内源激素的变化。我们利用根瘤根美西甘草'清水'(QS)、直根美西甘草'龙洞'(LD)和匍匐根美西甘草'工农 4 号'(GN)的沙生培养来研究它们对 P 的不同耐受程度。经过34天的钾胁迫处理后,株高、叶面积、比根长、比表面积、玉米素(ZT)含量和钾含量均随胁迫处理而下降。相反,吲哚-3-乙酸(IAA)、脱落酸(ABA)和赤霉素(GA3)的含量,以及根/芽比、总根长、直根长、根角、根尖和侧根数在当年和次年分别有所增加。拓扑指数和分形维度(FD)较小,而分形丰度(FA)和平均链长较大。根的分枝模式为二叉分枝。在低磷胁迫下,当年和次年 GN 的植株生物量、株高、叶长、叶面积、根/芽比、根总长、根尖数、根角度、比表面积和分形维数的响应幅度远小于 LD 和 QS。从这一角度来看,GN 比 LD 和 QS 对 P 条件更耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Changes in root architecture and endogenous hormone levels in alfalfa under phosphorus stress

Changes in root architecture and endogenous hormone levels in alfalfa under phosphorus stress

To explain changes in plant growth, root architecture, and endogenous hormones of different root-type alfalfa to phosphorus (P) stress (non-stressed control, 1.00 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4, versus P stress treatment, 0.01 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4). We used the sand culture of rhizomatous-rooted Medicago sativa ‘Qingshui’ (QS), tap-rooted M. sativa ‘Longdong’ (LD), and creeping-rooted M. varia ‘Gongnong No. 4’ (GN) to study the performance with contrasting degrees of P tolerance. After 34 days of P stress treatment, values for plant height, leaf area, specific root length, specific surface area, zeatin (ZT) level, and P content were decreased in response to stress treatment. In contrast, the contents of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellin (GA3), as well as the root/shoot ratio, total root length, taproot length, root angle, and the number of root tips and lateral roots, increased in the year and next year, respectively. The topological index and fractal dimension (FD) were small, while the fractal abundance (FA) and the average link length were large. The root branching patterns were dichotomous branching. The amplitude of this response of plant biomass, plant height, leaf length, leaf area, root/shoot ratio, total root length, number of root tips, root angle, specific surface area, and FD in GN of the year and next year was much smaller than those in LD and QS under low-P stress. From the point of view, GN was more tolerant than LD and QS under P condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Growth Regulation
Plant Growth Regulation 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant Growth Regulation is an international journal publishing original articles on all aspects of plant growth and development. We welcome manuscripts reporting question-based research using hormonal, physiological, environmental, genetical, biophysical, developmental or molecular approaches to the study of plant growth regulation. Emphasis is placed on papers presenting the results of original research. Occasional reviews on important topics will also be welcome. All contributions must be in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信