琐碎的门票建立信任":了解一所大型大学中安全支持互动的共同设计方法

IF 2.9 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Albesë Demjaha, David Pym, Tristan Caulfield, Simon Parkin
{"title":"琐碎的门票建立信任\":了解一所大型大学中安全支持互动的共同设计方法","authors":"Albesë Demjaha, David Pym, Tristan Caulfield, Simon Parkin","doi":"10.1093/cybsec/tyae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, organizations are acknowledging the importance of human factors in the management of security in workplaces. There are challenges in managing security infrastructures in which there may be centrally mandated and locally managed initiatives to promote secure behaviours. We apply a co-design methodology to harmonize employee behaviour and centralized security management in a large university. This involves iterative rounds of interviews connected by the co-design methodology: 14 employees working with high-value data with specific security needs; seven support staff across both local and central IT and IT-security support teams; and two senior security decision-makers in the organization. We find that employees prefer local support together with assurances that they are behaving securely, rather than precise instructions that lack local context. Trust in support teams that understand local needs also improves engagement, especially for employees who are unsure what to do. Policy is understood by employees through their interactions with support staff and when they see colleagues enacting secure behaviours in the workplace. The iterative co-design approach brings together the viewpoints of a range of employee groups and security decision-makers that capture key influences that drive secure working practices. We provide recommendations for improvements to workplace security, including recognizing that communication of the policy is as important as what is in the policy.","PeriodicalId":44310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cybersecurity","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The trivial tickets build the trust’: a co-design approach to understanding security support interactions in a large university\",\"authors\":\"Albesë Demjaha, David Pym, Tristan Caulfield, Simon Parkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cybsec/tyae007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly, organizations are acknowledging the importance of human factors in the management of security in workplaces. There are challenges in managing security infrastructures in which there may be centrally mandated and locally managed initiatives to promote secure behaviours. We apply a co-design methodology to harmonize employee behaviour and centralized security management in a large university. This involves iterative rounds of interviews connected by the co-design methodology: 14 employees working with high-value data with specific security needs; seven support staff across both local and central IT and IT-security support teams; and two senior security decision-makers in the organization. We find that employees prefer local support together with assurances that they are behaving securely, rather than precise instructions that lack local context. Trust in support teams that understand local needs also improves engagement, especially for employees who are unsure what to do. Policy is understood by employees through their interactions with support staff and when they see colleagues enacting secure behaviours in the workplace. The iterative co-design approach brings together the viewpoints of a range of employee groups and security decision-makers that capture key influences that drive secure working practices. We provide recommendations for improvements to workplace security, including recognizing that communication of the policy is as important as what is in the policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cybersecurity\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cybersecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyae007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyae007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的组织认识到人的因素在工作场所安全管理中的重要性。在管理安全基础设施方面存在着挑战,其中可能有中央授权和地方管理的措施来促进安全行为。我们在一所大型大学中采用了共同设计方法来协调员工行为和集中式安全管理。这包括通过共同设计方法进行的一轮又一轮的访谈,访谈对象包括:14 名处理高价值数据并有特殊安全需求的员工;7 名跨本地和中央 IT 及 IT 安全支持团队的支持人员;以及两名组织中的高级安全决策者。我们发现,员工更喜欢本地支持,以及确保他们行为安全的保证,而不是缺乏本地背景的精确指示。对了解本地需求的支持团队的信任也会提高员工的参与度,尤其是那些不知道该怎么做的员工。员工通过与支持人员的互动,以及看到同事在工作场所实施安全行为,就能理解政策。迭代式共同设计方法汇集了一系列员工群体和安全决策者的观点,抓住了推动安全工作实践的关键影响因素。我们提出了改进工作场所安全的建议,包括认识到政策沟通与政策内容同等重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘The trivial tickets build the trust’: a co-design approach to understanding security support interactions in a large university
Increasingly, organizations are acknowledging the importance of human factors in the management of security in workplaces. There are challenges in managing security infrastructures in which there may be centrally mandated and locally managed initiatives to promote secure behaviours. We apply a co-design methodology to harmonize employee behaviour and centralized security management in a large university. This involves iterative rounds of interviews connected by the co-design methodology: 14 employees working with high-value data with specific security needs; seven support staff across both local and central IT and IT-security support teams; and two senior security decision-makers in the organization. We find that employees prefer local support together with assurances that they are behaving securely, rather than precise instructions that lack local context. Trust in support teams that understand local needs also improves engagement, especially for employees who are unsure what to do. Policy is understood by employees through their interactions with support staff and when they see colleagues enacting secure behaviours in the workplace. The iterative co-design approach brings together the viewpoints of a range of employee groups and security decision-makers that capture key influences that drive secure working practices. We provide recommendations for improvements to workplace security, including recognizing that communication of the policy is as important as what is in the policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cybersecurity
Journal of Cybersecurity SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cybersecurity provides a hub around which the interdisciplinary cybersecurity community can form. The journal is committed to providing quality empirical research, as well as scholarship, that is grounded in real-world implications and solutions. Journal of Cybersecurity solicits articles adhering to the following, broadly constructed and interpreted, aspects of cybersecurity: anthropological and cultural studies; computer science and security; security and crime science; cryptography and associated topics; security economics; human factors and psychology; legal aspects of information security; political and policy perspectives; strategy and international relations; and privacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信