蒸汽是否提升了洪加火山喷发巨大羽流的高度和增长速度?

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Larry G. Mastin, Alexa R. Van Eaton, Shane J. Cronin
{"title":"蒸汽是否提升了洪加火山喷发巨大羽流的高度和增长速度?","authors":"Larry G. Mastin, Alexa R. Van Eaton, Shane J. Cronin","doi":"10.1007/s00445-024-01749-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The eruption of Hunga volcano on 15 January 2022 produced a higher plume and faster-growing umbrella cloud than has ever been previously recorded. The plume height exceeded 58 km, and the umbrella grew to 450 km in diameter within 50 min. Assuming an umbrella thickness of 10 km, this growth rate implied an average volume injection rate into the umbrella of 330–500 km<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. Conventional relationships between plume height, umbrella-growth rate, and mass eruption rate suggest that this period of activity should have injected a few to several cubic kilometers of rock particles (tephra) into the plume. Yet tephra fall deposits on neighboring islands are only a few centimeters thick and can be reproduced using ash transport simulations with only 0.1–0.2 km<sup>3</sup> erupted volume (dense-rock equivalent). How could such a powerful eruption contain so little tephra? Here, we propose that seawater mixing at the vent boosted the plume height and umbrella growth rate. Using the one-dimensional (1-D) steady plume model Plumeria, we find that a plume fed by ~90% water vapor at a temperature of 100 °C (referred to here as steam) could have exceeded 50 km height while keeping the injection rate of solids low enough to be consistent with Hunga’s modest tephra-fall deposit volume. Steam is envisaged to rise from intense phreatomagmatic jets or pyroclastic density currents entering the ocean. Overall, the height and expansion rate of Hunga’s giant plume is consistent with the total mass of fall deposits plus underwater density current deposits, even though most of the erupted mass decoupled from the high plume. This example represents a class of high (&gt; 10 km), ash-poor, steam-driven plumes, that also includes Kīlauea (2020) and Fukutoku-oka-no-ba (2021). Their height is driven by heat flux following well-established relations; however, most of the heat is contained in steam rather than particles. As a result, the heights of these water-rich plumes do not follow well-known relations with the mass eruption rate of tephra.</p>","PeriodicalId":55297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Volcanology","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did steam boost the height and growth rate of the giant Hunga eruption plume?\",\"authors\":\"Larry G. Mastin, Alexa R. Van Eaton, Shane J. Cronin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00445-024-01749-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The eruption of Hunga volcano on 15 January 2022 produced a higher plume and faster-growing umbrella cloud than has ever been previously recorded. The plume height exceeded 58 km, and the umbrella grew to 450 km in diameter within 50 min. Assuming an umbrella thickness of 10 km, this growth rate implied an average volume injection rate into the umbrella of 330–500 km<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. Conventional relationships between plume height, umbrella-growth rate, and mass eruption rate suggest that this period of activity should have injected a few to several cubic kilometers of rock particles (tephra) into the plume. Yet tephra fall deposits on neighboring islands are only a few centimeters thick and can be reproduced using ash transport simulations with only 0.1–0.2 km<sup>3</sup> erupted volume (dense-rock equivalent). How could such a powerful eruption contain so little tephra? Here, we propose that seawater mixing at the vent boosted the plume height and umbrella growth rate. Using the one-dimensional (1-D) steady plume model Plumeria, we find that a plume fed by ~90% water vapor at a temperature of 100 °C (referred to here as steam) could have exceeded 50 km height while keeping the injection rate of solids low enough to be consistent with Hunga’s modest tephra-fall deposit volume. Steam is envisaged to rise from intense phreatomagmatic jets or pyroclastic density currents entering the ocean. Overall, the height and expansion rate of Hunga’s giant plume is consistent with the total mass of fall deposits plus underwater density current deposits, even though most of the erupted mass decoupled from the high plume. This example represents a class of high (&gt; 10 km), ash-poor, steam-driven plumes, that also includes Kīlauea (2020) and Fukutoku-oka-no-ba (2021). Their height is driven by heat flux following well-established relations; however, most of the heat is contained in steam rather than particles. As a result, the heights of these water-rich plumes do not follow well-known relations with the mass eruption rate of tephra.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Volcanology\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Volcanology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-024-01749-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Volcanology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-024-01749-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 1 月 15 日,洪加火山喷发产生了比以往记录更高的烟羽和更快的伞状云。羽流高度超过 58 千米,伞状云在 50 分钟内直径增长到 450 千米。假设伞状云厚度为 10 千米,这一增长速度意味着伞状云的平均体积注入率为 330-500 千立方米/秒。烟羽高度、伞状增长速度和大规模喷发速度之间的传统关系表明,这一时期的活动应该向烟羽注入了几立方公里到几立方公里的岩石颗粒(表土)。然而,邻近岛屿上的岩屑沉积只有几厘米厚,而且可以通过火山灰输送模拟再现,喷发体积(致密岩石当量)只有 0.1-0.2 立方公里。如此强大的火山爆发怎么会产生如此少的火山灰呢?在这里,我们提出喷口处的海水混合提高了羽流高度和伞状增长速度。通过使用一维(1-D)稳定烟羽模型 Plumeria,我们发现由温度为 100 °C、约 90% 的水蒸气(此处称为蒸汽)提供能量的烟羽可以超过 50 千米的高度,同时保持足够低的固体喷射率,从而与洪嘎火山的适中的表土沉积量相一致。根据设想,蒸汽会从进入海洋的强烈岩浆喷流或火成碎屑密度流中升起。总体而言,洪加巨型羽流的高度和膨胀率与坠落沉积物和水下密度流沉积物的总质量相一致,尽管大部分喷发质量与高羽流脱钩。这个例子代表了一类高(> 10 km)、贫灰、蒸汽驱动的羽流,其中还包括 Kīlauea (2020) 和 Fukutoku-oka-no-ba (2021)。它们的高度是由热通量驱动的,与热通量的关系已得到证实;但是,大部分热量都包含在蒸汽中,而不是颗粒中。因此,这些富含水的羽流的高度并不遵循众所周知的与块状火山灰的大量喷发率之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Did steam boost the height and growth rate of the giant Hunga eruption plume?

Did steam boost the height and growth rate of the giant Hunga eruption plume?

The eruption of Hunga volcano on 15 January 2022 produced a higher plume and faster-growing umbrella cloud than has ever been previously recorded. The plume height exceeded 58 km, and the umbrella grew to 450 km in diameter within 50 min. Assuming an umbrella thickness of 10 km, this growth rate implied an average volume injection rate into the umbrella of 330–500 km3 s−1. Conventional relationships between plume height, umbrella-growth rate, and mass eruption rate suggest that this period of activity should have injected a few to several cubic kilometers of rock particles (tephra) into the plume. Yet tephra fall deposits on neighboring islands are only a few centimeters thick and can be reproduced using ash transport simulations with only 0.1–0.2 km3 erupted volume (dense-rock equivalent). How could such a powerful eruption contain so little tephra? Here, we propose that seawater mixing at the vent boosted the plume height and umbrella growth rate. Using the one-dimensional (1-D) steady plume model Plumeria, we find that a plume fed by ~90% water vapor at a temperature of 100 °C (referred to here as steam) could have exceeded 50 km height while keeping the injection rate of solids low enough to be consistent with Hunga’s modest tephra-fall deposit volume. Steam is envisaged to rise from intense phreatomagmatic jets or pyroclastic density currents entering the ocean. Overall, the height and expansion rate of Hunga’s giant plume is consistent with the total mass of fall deposits plus underwater density current deposits, even though most of the erupted mass decoupled from the high plume. This example represents a class of high (> 10 km), ash-poor, steam-driven plumes, that also includes Kīlauea (2020) and Fukutoku-oka-no-ba (2021). Their height is driven by heat flux following well-established relations; however, most of the heat is contained in steam rather than particles. As a result, the heights of these water-rich plumes do not follow well-known relations with the mass eruption rate of tephra.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Volcanology
Bulletin of Volcanology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Volcanology was founded in 1922, as Bulletin Volcanologique, and is the official journal of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI). The Bulletin of Volcanology publishes papers on volcanoes, their products, their eruptive behavior, and their hazards. Papers aimed at understanding the deeper structure of volcanoes, and the evolution of magmatic systems using geochemical, petrological, and geophysical techniques are also published. Material is published in four sections: Review Articles; Research Articles; Short Scientific Communications; and a Forum that provides for discussion of controversial issues and for comment and reply on previously published Articles and Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信