人人都需要好邻居:重新引入的中型食肉动物的移动、栖息地利用和同种联系

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Belinda A. Wilson, Maldwyn J. Evans, Shoshana Rapley, Iain J. Gordon, Claire Wimpenny, Jenny Newport, Adrian D. Manning
{"title":"人人都需要好邻居:重新引入的中型食肉动物的移动、栖息地利用和同种联系","authors":"Belinda A. Wilson, Maldwyn J. Evans, Shoshana Rapley, Iain J. Gordon, Claire Wimpenny, Jenny Newport, Adrian D. Manning","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02884-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a reintroduction progresses through the establishment, growth, and regulation phases, density-dependent mechanisms increasingly drive population dynamics. This can complicate efforts to reinforce these populations if the translocated individuals (henceforth reinforcers) are excluded, or existing residents become displaced. This is especially pertinent for islands and fenced havens, where immigration is often only possible by translocation. Conspecific associations offer insights into how these density-dependent mechanisms manifest in space and time. We investigated how movement, habitat use, and conspecific associations differed between eastern quoll (<i>Dasyurus viverrinus</i>) residents and reinforcers at a conservation-fenced haven. We used GPS collars to quantify distances travelled per night, home and core ranges, nocturnal (activity) and diurnal (denning) habitat use and preference, and conspecific associations over three periods: baseline (residents only, days 3–21), release (both cohorts, days 22–32), and settlement (reinforcers only, days 33–52) for ≤ 42 days post-release (depending on GPS unit longevity). Eastern quolls travelled greater mean distances per night (&lt; 2.15 km, x̄ 1.75 km) and had larger home ranges (&lt; 251 ha, x̄ 178 ha) during the release period. Reinforcers had larger home ranges (249 ha) and greater overlap with other collared eastern quolls (115 ha) when compared to residents (range 90 ha, overlap 46 ha). We found a significant preference for grassland habitat across all animals and periods. During the settlement period, we found a preference for nocturnal activity in greater understory and south-west facing aspects, and lower movement correlation, sociality, and den sharing between collared eastern quolls. Finally, we found lower den sharing in reinforcers (29%) compared to residents (52%), and for fawn- animals compared to dark-morphs. Our results revealed short-term movements, habitat use, and conspecific associations at a greater spatiotemporal resolution than has ever been achieved for this species. Our findings offer important insights into the importance of appropriate habitat and conspecific cueing for reintroductions, and highlight the need to monitor density-dependent mechanisms to inform adaptive management to promote positive outcomes for both initial reintroductions and reinforcements.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everybody needs good neighbours: movement, habitat use, and conspecific association in a reintroduced mesopredator\",\"authors\":\"Belinda A. Wilson, Maldwyn J. Evans, Shoshana Rapley, Iain J. Gordon, Claire Wimpenny, Jenny Newport, Adrian D. Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10531-024-02884-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As a reintroduction progresses through the establishment, growth, and regulation phases, density-dependent mechanisms increasingly drive population dynamics. This can complicate efforts to reinforce these populations if the translocated individuals (henceforth reinforcers) are excluded, or existing residents become displaced. This is especially pertinent for islands and fenced havens, where immigration is often only possible by translocation. Conspecific associations offer insights into how these density-dependent mechanisms manifest in space and time. We investigated how movement, habitat use, and conspecific associations differed between eastern quoll (<i>Dasyurus viverrinus</i>) residents and reinforcers at a conservation-fenced haven. We used GPS collars to quantify distances travelled per night, home and core ranges, nocturnal (activity) and diurnal (denning) habitat use and preference, and conspecific associations over three periods: baseline (residents only, days 3–21), release (both cohorts, days 22–32), and settlement (reinforcers only, days 33–52) for ≤ 42 days post-release (depending on GPS unit longevity). Eastern quolls travelled greater mean distances per night (&lt; 2.15 km, x̄ 1.75 km) and had larger home ranges (&lt; 251 ha, x̄ 178 ha) during the release period. Reinforcers had larger home ranges (249 ha) and greater overlap with other collared eastern quolls (115 ha) when compared to residents (range 90 ha, overlap 46 ha). We found a significant preference for grassland habitat across all animals and periods. During the settlement period, we found a preference for nocturnal activity in greater understory and south-west facing aspects, and lower movement correlation, sociality, and den sharing between collared eastern quolls. Finally, we found lower den sharing in reinforcers (29%) compared to residents (52%), and for fawn- animals compared to dark-morphs. Our results revealed short-term movements, habitat use, and conspecific associations at a greater spatiotemporal resolution than has ever been achieved for this species. Our findings offer important insights into the importance of appropriate habitat and conspecific cueing for reintroductions, and highlight the need to monitor density-dependent mechanisms to inform adaptive management to promote positive outcomes for both initial reintroductions and reinforcements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02884-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02884-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着重新引入种群在建立、生长和调节阶段的进展,密度依赖机制越来越多地驱动种群动态。如果迁入的个体(以下简称 "强化者")被排除在外,或者现有居民被迁移,那么强化这些种群的工作就会变得复杂。这一点对岛屿和围栏避风港尤为重要,因为这些地方通常只有通过迁移才能实现移民。同种结合可以让我们深入了解这些密度依赖机制在空间和时间上的表现。我们研究了在一个保护性围栏庇护所中,东部疣鼻天鹅(Dasyurus viverrinus)居民与强化者之间在移动、栖息地利用和同种联系方面的差异。我们使用全球定位系统项圈对以下三个时期的每晚移动距离、家园和核心范围、夜间(活动)和昼间(筑巢)栖息地使用和偏好以及同种动物关联进行了量化:基线期(仅居民,第3-21天)、释放期(两组动物,第22-32天)和释放后≤42天的定居期(仅强化者,第33-52天)(取决于全球定位系统装置的寿命)。在放归期间,东部石鸡每晚的平均旅行距离(< 2.15千米,x̄ 1.75千米)更远,家园范围(< 251公顷,x̄ 178公顷)更大。与居民(范围 90 公顷,重叠 46 公顷)相比,强化者有更大的家园范围(249 公顷),并且与其他领有项圈的东魁鼠有更大的重叠(115 公顷)。我们发现,所有动物和所有时期都明显偏好草地栖息地。在定居期,我们发现领角羚偏好在林下和西南方向的夜间活动,而且领角羚之间的运动相关性、社会性和巢穴共享性较低。最后,我们发现强化动物(29%)的巢穴共享率比居民(52%)低,幼崽动物的巢穴共享率比暗色形态低。我们的研究结果以更高的时空分辨率揭示了该物种的短期移动、栖息地利用和同种联系。我们的研究结果为适当的栖息地和同种提示对重新引入的重要性提供了重要见解,并强调了监测密度依赖机制的必要性,从而为适应性管理提供信息,以促进初次重新引入和强化的积极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Everybody needs good neighbours: movement, habitat use, and conspecific association in a reintroduced mesopredator

Everybody needs good neighbours: movement, habitat use, and conspecific association in a reintroduced mesopredator

As a reintroduction progresses through the establishment, growth, and regulation phases, density-dependent mechanisms increasingly drive population dynamics. This can complicate efforts to reinforce these populations if the translocated individuals (henceforth reinforcers) are excluded, or existing residents become displaced. This is especially pertinent for islands and fenced havens, where immigration is often only possible by translocation. Conspecific associations offer insights into how these density-dependent mechanisms manifest in space and time. We investigated how movement, habitat use, and conspecific associations differed between eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) residents and reinforcers at a conservation-fenced haven. We used GPS collars to quantify distances travelled per night, home and core ranges, nocturnal (activity) and diurnal (denning) habitat use and preference, and conspecific associations over three periods: baseline (residents only, days 3–21), release (both cohorts, days 22–32), and settlement (reinforcers only, days 33–52) for ≤ 42 days post-release (depending on GPS unit longevity). Eastern quolls travelled greater mean distances per night (< 2.15 km, x̄ 1.75 km) and had larger home ranges (< 251 ha, x̄ 178 ha) during the release period. Reinforcers had larger home ranges (249 ha) and greater overlap with other collared eastern quolls (115 ha) when compared to residents (range 90 ha, overlap 46 ha). We found a significant preference for grassland habitat across all animals and periods. During the settlement period, we found a preference for nocturnal activity in greater understory and south-west facing aspects, and lower movement correlation, sociality, and den sharing between collared eastern quolls. Finally, we found lower den sharing in reinforcers (29%) compared to residents (52%), and for fawn- animals compared to dark-morphs. Our results revealed short-term movements, habitat use, and conspecific associations at a greater spatiotemporal resolution than has ever been achieved for this species. Our findings offer important insights into the importance of appropriate habitat and conspecific cueing for reintroductions, and highlight the need to monitor density-dependent mechanisms to inform adaptive management to promote positive outcomes for both initial reintroductions and reinforcements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信