与 COVID-19 感染相关的心理健康症状的心理治疗:范围综述。

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.223
So Sugita, Kotone Hata, Krandhasi Kodaiarasu, Naoki Takamatsu, Kentaro Kimura, Christian Miller, Lecsy Gonzalez, Ikue Umemoto, Keitaro Murayama, Tomohiro Nakao, Shinsuke Kito, Masaya Ito, Hironori Kuga
{"title":"与 COVID-19 感染相关的心理健康症状的心理治疗:范围综述。","authors":"So Sugita, Kotone Hata, Krandhasi Kodaiarasu, Naoki Takamatsu, Kentaro Kimura, Christian Miller, Lecsy Gonzalez, Ikue Umemoto, Keitaro Murayama, Tomohiro Nakao, Shinsuke Kito, Masaya Ito, Hironori Kuga","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize published studies and ongoing clinical trials of psychological interventions for mental health problems associated with COVID-19 infection. The study protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. We conducted systematic searches for studies published or registered between January 2020 and October 2022 using eight scientific databases and clinical trial registries, which identified 40 complete published studies and 53 ongoing clinical trials. We found that most studies were randomized controlled trials (74%) while the remaining used study designs of lower methodological quality. Most studies investigated interventions for acute COVID-19 patients (74%) and others explored post-COVID conditions (PCC) or recovered patients. Cognitive and behavioral therapies were the main intervention approaches (31%), followed by multidisciplinary programs (21%) and mindfulness (17%). The most frequently evaluated outcomes were anxiety (33%), depression (26%), quality of life (13%), and insomnia (10%). No studies on youths, older people, or marginalized communities were found. These findings summarize the burgeoning research on a range of psychological interventions for individuals infected with COVID-19. However, the field is in its infancy and further research to develop an evidence base for targeted care is necessary. The gaps identified in the current study also highlight the need for more research on youths, older people, and members of marginalized communities, and PCC patients. It is important to ascertain interventions and delivery strategies that are not only effective and affordable but also allow high scalability and accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"3 3","pages":"e223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological treatments for mental health symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"So Sugita, Kotone Hata, Krandhasi Kodaiarasu, Naoki Takamatsu, Kentaro Kimura, Christian Miller, Lecsy Gonzalez, Ikue Umemoto, Keitaro Murayama, Tomohiro Nakao, Shinsuke Kito, Masaya Ito, Hironori Kuga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pcn5.223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize published studies and ongoing clinical trials of psychological interventions for mental health problems associated with COVID-19 infection. The study protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. We conducted systematic searches for studies published or registered between January 2020 and October 2022 using eight scientific databases and clinical trial registries, which identified 40 complete published studies and 53 ongoing clinical trials. We found that most studies were randomized controlled trials (74%) while the remaining used study designs of lower methodological quality. Most studies investigated interventions for acute COVID-19 patients (74%) and others explored post-COVID conditions (PCC) or recovered patients. Cognitive and behavioral therapies were the main intervention approaches (31%), followed by multidisciplinary programs (21%) and mindfulness (17%). The most frequently evaluated outcomes were anxiety (33%), depression (26%), quality of life (13%), and insomnia (10%). No studies on youths, older people, or marginalized communities were found. These findings summarize the burgeoning research on a range of psychological interventions for individuals infected with COVID-19. However, the field is in its infancy and further research to develop an evidence base for targeted care is necessary. The gaps identified in the current study also highlight the need for more research on youths, older people, and members of marginalized communities, and PCC patients. It is important to ascertain interventions and delivery strategies that are not only effective and affordable but also allow high scalability and accessibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"e223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本范围综述旨在综合已发表的研究和正在进行的临床试验,以探讨针对与 COVID-19 感染相关的心理健康问题的心理干预措施。研究方案是根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)扩展版制定的。我们利用 8 个科学数据库和临床试验注册中心对 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月间发表或注册的研究进行了系统检索,共发现 40 项已发表的完整研究和 53 项正在进行的临床试验。我们发现,大多数研究都是随机对照试验(74%),而其余研究则采用了方法学质量较低的研究设计。大多数研究调查了针对急性 COVID-19 患者的干预措施(74%),其他研究则探讨了 COVID 后情况(PCC)或康复患者。认知和行为疗法是主要的干预方法(31%),其次是多学科计划(21%)和正念(17%)。最常评估的结果是焦虑(33%)、抑郁(26%)、生活质量(13%)和失眠(10%)。没有发现针对青少年、老年人或边缘化群体的研究。这些研究结果总结了针对 COVID-19 感染者的一系列心理干预措施的新兴研究。然而,这一领域尚处于起步阶段,有必要开展进一步研究,为有针对性的护理提供证据基础。本研究中发现的差距也凸显了对青少年、老年人、边缘化社区成员以及 PCC 患者进行更多研究的必要性。重要的是要确定不仅有效、负担得起,而且具有高度可扩展性和可获得性的干预措施和实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological treatments for mental health symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection: A scoping review.

The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize published studies and ongoing clinical trials of psychological interventions for mental health problems associated with COVID-19 infection. The study protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. We conducted systematic searches for studies published or registered between January 2020 and October 2022 using eight scientific databases and clinical trial registries, which identified 40 complete published studies and 53 ongoing clinical trials. We found that most studies were randomized controlled trials (74%) while the remaining used study designs of lower methodological quality. Most studies investigated interventions for acute COVID-19 patients (74%) and others explored post-COVID conditions (PCC) or recovered patients. Cognitive and behavioral therapies were the main intervention approaches (31%), followed by multidisciplinary programs (21%) and mindfulness (17%). The most frequently evaluated outcomes were anxiety (33%), depression (26%), quality of life (13%), and insomnia (10%). No studies on youths, older people, or marginalized communities were found. These findings summarize the burgeoning research on a range of psychological interventions for individuals infected with COVID-19. However, the field is in its infancy and further research to develop an evidence base for targeted care is necessary. The gaps identified in the current study also highlight the need for more research on youths, older people, and members of marginalized communities, and PCC patients. It is important to ascertain interventions and delivery strategies that are not only effective and affordable but also allow high scalability and accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信