{"title":"利用预测性动态模拟进行全膝关节置换术后的最佳植入物定位。","authors":"Behzad Danaei, John McPhee","doi":"10.1115/1.4065879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the determination of the optimal subject-specific placement of knee implants based on predictive dynamic simulations of human movement following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two knee implant models are introduced. The first model is a comprehensive 12-degree-of-freedom (DoF) representation that incorporates volumetric contact between femoral and tibial implants, as well as patellofemoral contact. The second model employs a single-degree-of-freedom equivalent kinematic (SEK) approach for the knee joint. A cosimulation framework is proposed to leverage both knee models in our simulations. The knee model is calibrated and validated using patient-specific data, including knee kinematics and ground reaction forces. Additionally, quantitative indices are introduced to evaluate the optimality of implant positioning based on three criteria: balancing medial and lateral load distributions, ligament balancing, and varus/valgus alignment. The knee implant placement is optimized by minimizing the deviation of the indices from their user-defined desired values during predicted sit-to-stand motion. The method presented in this paper has the potential to enhance the results of knee arthroplasty and serve as a valuable instrument for surgeons when planning and performing this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Implant Positioning Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Predictive Dynamic Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Behzad Danaei, John McPhee\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the determination of the optimal subject-specific placement of knee implants based on predictive dynamic simulations of human movement following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two knee implant models are introduced. The first model is a comprehensive 12-degree-of-freedom (DoF) representation that incorporates volumetric contact between femoral and tibial implants, as well as patellofemoral contact. The second model employs a single-degree-of-freedom equivalent kinematic (SEK) approach for the knee joint. A cosimulation framework is proposed to leverage both knee models in our simulations. The knee model is calibrated and validated using patient-specific data, including knee kinematics and ground reaction forces. Additionally, quantitative indices are introduced to evaluate the optimality of implant positioning based on three criteria: balancing medial and lateral load distributions, ligament balancing, and varus/valgus alignment. The knee implant placement is optimized by minimizing the deviation of the indices from their user-defined desired values during predicted sit-to-stand motion. The method presented in this paper has the potential to enhance the results of knee arthroplasty and serve as a valuable instrument for surgeons when planning and performing this procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065879\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Implant Positioning Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Predictive Dynamic Simulation.
In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the determination of the optimal subject-specific placement of knee implants based on predictive dynamic simulations of human movement following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two knee implant models are introduced. The first model is a comprehensive 12-degree-of-freedom (DoF) representation that incorporates volumetric contact between femoral and tibial implants, as well as patellofemoral contact. The second model employs a single-degree-of-freedom equivalent kinematic (SEK) approach for the knee joint. A cosimulation framework is proposed to leverage both knee models in our simulations. The knee model is calibrated and validated using patient-specific data, including knee kinematics and ground reaction forces. Additionally, quantitative indices are introduced to evaluate the optimality of implant positioning based on three criteria: balancing medial and lateral load distributions, ligament balancing, and varus/valgus alignment. The knee implant placement is optimized by minimizing the deviation of the indices from their user-defined desired values during predicted sit-to-stand motion. The method presented in this paper has the potential to enhance the results of knee arthroplasty and serve as a valuable instrument for surgeons when planning and performing this procedure.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.