固体燃料的使用与出生体重不足:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jie He, Kangkang Zhong, Rui Yang, Chuanting Wen, Shubo Liu, Yiping Yang, Qi Zhong
{"title":"固体燃料的使用与出生体重不足:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Jie He, Kangkang Zhong, Rui Yang, Chuanting Wen, Shubo Liu, Yiping Yang, Qi Zhong","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2024-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid fuel use is increasingly linked to low birth weight (LBW), but conclusions were inconsistent. We aimed to summarize the association between solid fuel use and LBW. Twenty-one studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified through PubMed, Qvid Medline, and Web of Science databases. The final search occurred on March 20, 2024. Summary relative effect and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results. Nineteen studies evaluated the association between solid fuel use in pregnant woman and LBW (1.188 for solid fuels: 1.055 to 1.322). No significant heterogeneity was identified among the included studies (p=0.010, Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.02, I<sup>2</sup>=48.1 %). Subgroup analysis found positive correlations for Asia, data years prior to 2014, and rural studies (1.245 for Asia: 1.077 to 1.412; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.03, I<sup>2</sup>=56.0 %; 1.243 for data years prior to 2014: 1.062 to 1.424; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.04, I<sup>2</sup>=60.98 %; 1.514 for rural: 1.258 to 1.771; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.00, I<sup>2</sup>=0.0 %). Our meta-analysis showed that solid fuel use in pregnant women had an impact on LBW. Measures and policies are also needed to promote energy conversion and to limit and reduce the use of solid fuels.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solid fuel use and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jie He, Kangkang Zhong, Rui Yang, Chuanting Wen, Shubo Liu, Yiping Yang, Qi Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/reveh-2024-0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Solid fuel use is increasingly linked to low birth weight (LBW), but conclusions were inconsistent. We aimed to summarize the association between solid fuel use and LBW. Twenty-one studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified through PubMed, Qvid Medline, and Web of Science databases. The final search occurred on March 20, 2024. Summary relative effect and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results. Nineteen studies evaluated the association between solid fuel use in pregnant woman and LBW (1.188 for solid fuels: 1.055 to 1.322). No significant heterogeneity was identified among the included studies (p=0.010, Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.02, I<sup>2</sup>=48.1 %). Subgroup analysis found positive correlations for Asia, data years prior to 2014, and rural studies (1.245 for Asia: 1.077 to 1.412; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.03, I<sup>2</sup>=56.0 %; 1.243 for data years prior to 2014: 1.062 to 1.424; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.04, I<sup>2</sup>=60.98 %; 1.514 for rural: 1.258 to 1.771; Tau<sup>2</sup>=0.00, I<sup>2</sup>=0.0 %). Our meta-analysis showed that solid fuel use in pregnant women had an impact on LBW. Measures and policies are also needed to promote energy conversion and to limit and reduce the use of solid fuels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2024-0055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2024-0055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固体燃料的使用与低出生体重(LBW)之间的关系日益密切,但结论并不一致。我们旨在总结固体燃料的使用与低出生体重之间的关系。我们通过 PubMed、Qvid Medline 和 Web of Science 数据库确定了 21 项符合纳入标准的研究。最后的搜索于 2024 年 3 月 20 日完成。采用随机效应模型估算了汇总的相对效应和 95% 的置信区间。进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析,以调查可能的异质性来源并检验结果的稳定性。19 项研究评估了孕妇使用固体燃料与婴儿夭折之间的关系(固体燃料为 1.188:1.055 至 1.322)。在纳入的研究中未发现明显的异质性(P=0.010,Tau2=0.02,I2=48.1%)。分组分析发现,亚洲、2014 年之前的数据年份和农村研究之间存在正相关(亚洲为 1.245:1.077 至 1.412;Tau2=0.03,I2=56.0%;2014 年之前的数据年份为 1.243:农村地区为 1.514:1.258 至 1.771;Tau2=0.00,I2=0.0%)。我们的荟萃分析表明,孕妇使用固体燃料对婴儿夭折有影响。还需要采取措施和政策来促进能源转换,限制和减少固体燃料的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solid fuel use and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Solid fuel use is increasingly linked to low birth weight (LBW), but conclusions were inconsistent. We aimed to summarize the association between solid fuel use and LBW. Twenty-one studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified through PubMed, Qvid Medline, and Web of Science databases. The final search occurred on March 20, 2024. Summary relative effect and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results. Nineteen studies evaluated the association between solid fuel use in pregnant woman and LBW (1.188 for solid fuels: 1.055 to 1.322). No significant heterogeneity was identified among the included studies (p=0.010, Tau2=0.02, I2=48.1 %). Subgroup analysis found positive correlations for Asia, data years prior to 2014, and rural studies (1.245 for Asia: 1.077 to 1.412; Tau2=0.03, I2=56.0 %; 1.243 for data years prior to 2014: 1.062 to 1.424; Tau2=0.04, I2=60.98 %; 1.514 for rural: 1.258 to 1.771; Tau2=0.00, I2=0.0 %). Our meta-analysis showed that solid fuel use in pregnant women had an impact on LBW. Measures and policies are also needed to promote energy conversion and to limit and reduce the use of solid fuels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信