神经外科病房生命终结决定后的临床过程:需要学习和改进的地方还有很多。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xenia Hautmann, Veit Rohde, Christian von der Brelie
{"title":"神经外科病房生命终结决定后的临床过程:需要学习和改进的地方还有很多。","authors":"Xenia Hautmann, Veit Rohde, Christian von der Brelie","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> End-of-life (EoL) decisions are routine in neurosurgical care due to frequent devastating and life-threatening diagnoses. Advance directives, discussions with patients' relatives, and evaluation of the alleged will of the patient play an increasing important role in clinical decision-making. Institutional standards, ethical values, different ethnical backgrounds, and individual physician's experiences influence clinical judgments and decisions. We hypothesize that the implementation of palliative care in neurosurgical wards needs optimization. The aim of this study is to identify possible sources of error and to share our experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This is a retrospective observational analysis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients who died on a regular neurosurgical ward between 2014 and 2019 were included. Medical reports were analyzed in detail. A differentiation between consistent and nonconsistent palliation was made, with consistent palliative care consisting of discontinuation of medication that was no longer indicated, administration of medication for symptom control, and consequent discontinuation of nutrition and fluid substitution that went beyond satisfying hunger or thirst.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> EoL decisions were made in 127 (84.1%) of all 168 cases; 100 patients were included in our analysis. Of these patients, only 24 had an advance directive, and the relatives were included in the communication about the therapy goals in 71 cases. Discontinuation of medication that is not for symptom control was performed in 63 patients, food withdrawal in 66 patients, and fluid substitution that went beyond the quenching of thirst was withdrawn in 27 patients. Thus, consistent palliative care was realized in 25% of all patients. The mean duration from the EoL decision until death was 2.1 days (range: 0-20 days). If a consistent palliative care was carried out, patients survived significantly shorter (nonconsistent palliative care: 2.4 days; range: 0-10 days vs. consistent palliative care: 1.2 days; range: 0-4 days; <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The therapy goal should be thoroughly considered and determined at an early stage. If an EoL decision is reached, consistent palliative care should be carried out in order to limit suffering of moribund patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"549-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Course after End-of-Life Decisions on a Neurosurgical Ward: Much to Learn and Improve.\",\"authors\":\"Xenia Hautmann, Veit Rohde, Christian von der Brelie\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> End-of-life (EoL) decisions are routine in neurosurgical care due to frequent devastating and life-threatening diagnoses. Advance directives, discussions with patients' relatives, and evaluation of the alleged will of the patient play an increasing important role in clinical decision-making. Institutional standards, ethical values, different ethnical backgrounds, and individual physician's experiences influence clinical judgments and decisions. We hypothesize that the implementation of palliative care in neurosurgical wards needs optimization. The aim of this study is to identify possible sources of error and to share our experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This is a retrospective observational analysis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients who died on a regular neurosurgical ward between 2014 and 2019 were included. Medical reports were analyzed in detail. A differentiation between consistent and nonconsistent palliation was made, with consistent palliative care consisting of discontinuation of medication that was no longer indicated, administration of medication for symptom control, and consequent discontinuation of nutrition and fluid substitution that went beyond satisfying hunger or thirst.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> EoL decisions were made in 127 (84.1%) of all 168 cases; 100 patients were included in our analysis. Of these patients, only 24 had an advance directive, and the relatives were included in the communication about the therapy goals in 71 cases. Discontinuation of medication that is not for symptom control was performed in 63 patients, food withdrawal in 66 patients, and fluid substitution that went beyond the quenching of thirst was withdrawn in 27 patients. Thus, consistent palliative care was realized in 25% of all patients. The mean duration from the EoL decision until death was 2.1 days (range: 0-20 days). If a consistent palliative care was carried out, patients survived significantly shorter (nonconsistent palliative care: 2.4 days; range: 0-10 days vs. consistent palliative care: 1.2 days; range: 0-4 days; <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The therapy goal should be thoroughly considered and determined at an early stage. If an EoL decision is reached, consistent palliative care should be carried out in order to limit suffering of moribund patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于经常出现破坏性和危及生命的诊断,生命末期(EoL)决策是神经外科护理中的常规决策。预嘱、与患者亲属的讨论以及对患者所谓意愿的评估在临床决策中发挥着越来越重要的作用。机构标准、伦理价值观、不同的种族背景以及医生个人的经验都会影响临床判断和决策。我们假设神经外科病房姑息关怀的实施需要优化。本研究旨在找出可能的错误根源,并分享我们的经验:这是一项回顾性观察分析。研究纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年期间在神经外科普通病房死亡的 168 名患者。详细分析了医疗报告。对一贯性姑息治疗和非一贯性姑息治疗进行了区分,一贯性姑息治疗包括停用不再适用的药物、为控制症状而用药,以及随之停用超出满足饥饿或口渴的营养和液体替代:在所有 168 例病例中,有 127 例(84.1%)做出了 EoL 决定;100 例患者纳入了我们的分析。在这些患者中,只有 24 人有预先指示,71 例患者的亲属参与了有关治疗目标的沟通。有 63 例患者停用了非用于控制症状的药物,66 例患者停食,27 例患者停用了止渴以外的液体替代品。因此,在所有患者中,有 25% 的患者得到了持续的姑息治疗。从做出 EoL 决定到死亡的平均持续时间为 2.1 天(范围:0-20 天)。如果实施了一致的姑息治疗,患者的存活时间会明显缩短(非一致的姑息治疗:2.4 天;范围:0-10 天;一致的姑息治疗:0-10 天):0-10天;一致的姑息治疗:1.2天;范围:0-4天;P = 0.5:结论:结论:治疗目标应在早期阶段得到充分考虑和确定。结论:应在早期阶段全面考虑并确定治疗目标,如果决定 EoL,则应实施持续的姑息治疗,以减轻濒死患者的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Course after End-of-Life Decisions on a Neurosurgical Ward: Much to Learn and Improve.

Background:  End-of-life (EoL) decisions are routine in neurosurgical care due to frequent devastating and life-threatening diagnoses. Advance directives, discussions with patients' relatives, and evaluation of the alleged will of the patient play an increasing important role in clinical decision-making. Institutional standards, ethical values, different ethnical backgrounds, and individual physician's experiences influence clinical judgments and decisions. We hypothesize that the implementation of palliative care in neurosurgical wards needs optimization. The aim of this study is to identify possible sources of error and to share our experiences.

Methods:  This is a retrospective observational analysis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients who died on a regular neurosurgical ward between 2014 and 2019 were included. Medical reports were analyzed in detail. A differentiation between consistent and nonconsistent palliation was made, with consistent palliative care consisting of discontinuation of medication that was no longer indicated, administration of medication for symptom control, and consequent discontinuation of nutrition and fluid substitution that went beyond satisfying hunger or thirst.

Results:  EoL decisions were made in 127 (84.1%) of all 168 cases; 100 patients were included in our analysis. Of these patients, only 24 had an advance directive, and the relatives were included in the communication about the therapy goals in 71 cases. Discontinuation of medication that is not for symptom control was performed in 63 patients, food withdrawal in 66 patients, and fluid substitution that went beyond the quenching of thirst was withdrawn in 27 patients. Thus, consistent palliative care was realized in 25% of all patients. The mean duration from the EoL decision until death was 2.1 days (range: 0-20 days). If a consistent palliative care was carried out, patients survived significantly shorter (nonconsistent palliative care: 2.4 days; range: 0-10 days vs. consistent palliative care: 1.2 days; range: 0-4 days; p = 0.008).

Conclusions:  The therapy goal should be thoroughly considered and determined at an early stage. If an EoL decision is reached, consistent palliative care should be carried out in order to limit suffering of moribund patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信