肩关节镜手术中硬膜下上躯干阻滞对横膈膜的保护作用:随机对照试验

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034
Yumin Jo, Chahyun Oh, Woo-Yong Lee, Donggeun Lee, Suyeon Shin, Woosuk Chung, Chaeseong Lim, Sun Yeul Lee, Boohwi Hong
{"title":"肩关节镜手术中硬膜下上躯干阻滞对横膈膜的保护作用:随机对照试验","authors":"Yumin Jo, Chahyun Oh, Woo-Yong Lee, Donggeun Lee, Suyeon Shin, Woosuk Chung, Chaeseong Lim, Sun Yeul Lee, Boohwi Hong","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inter-scalene block (ISB) is associated with an inevitable risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (HDP). To reduce the risk of HDP, an upper trunk block (UTB) has been proposed at the brachial plexus division level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesised that UTB would be associated with a lower incidence of HDP than ISB while providing sufficient analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Seventy patients aged 20 to 80 years undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Ultrasound-guided ISB or UTB was performed with 5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of complete HDP, assessed by diaphragm excursion using ultrasound, defined as a decrease to 25% or less of baseline or occurrence of paradoxical movement. Postoperative pulmonary function change, pain scores, opioid consumption and pain-related outcomes were the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UTB group had a significantly lower incidence of complete HDP than the ISB group [5.9% (2/34) vs. 41.7% (15/36); absolute difference, 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 17.8 to 53.7%; P  < 0.001]. The postblockade decline in pulmonary function was more pronounced in the ISB group than that in the UTB group. The pain score at 1 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups (ISB vs. UTB group: median 0 vs. 1; median difference, -1; 95% CI, -2 to 0.5). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UTB was associated with a lower incidence of HDP compared with ISB while providing excellent analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) identifier: KCT0007002.</p><p><strong>Irb number: </strong>Chungnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board No. 2021-12-069.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diaphragm-sparing efficacy of subparaneural upper trunk block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yumin Jo, Chahyun Oh, Woo-Yong Lee, Donggeun Lee, Suyeon Shin, Woosuk Chung, Chaeseong Lim, Sun Yeul Lee, Boohwi Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inter-scalene block (ISB) is associated with an inevitable risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (HDP). To reduce the risk of HDP, an upper trunk block (UTB) has been proposed at the brachial plexus division level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesised that UTB would be associated with a lower incidence of HDP than ISB while providing sufficient analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Seventy patients aged 20 to 80 years undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Ultrasound-guided ISB or UTB was performed with 5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of complete HDP, assessed by diaphragm excursion using ultrasound, defined as a decrease to 25% or less of baseline or occurrence of paradoxical movement. Postoperative pulmonary function change, pain scores, opioid consumption and pain-related outcomes were the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UTB group had a significantly lower incidence of complete HDP than the ISB group [5.9% (2/34) vs. 41.7% (15/36); absolute difference, 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 17.8 to 53.7%; P  < 0.001]. The postblockade decline in pulmonary function was more pronounced in the ISB group than that in the UTB group. The pain score at 1 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups (ISB vs. UTB group: median 0 vs. 1; median difference, -1; 95% CI, -2 to 0.5). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UTB was associated with a lower incidence of HDP compared with ISB while providing excellent analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) identifier: KCT0007002.</p><p><strong>Irb number: </strong>Chungnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board No. 2021-12-069.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩胛间阻滞(ISB)不可避免地存在半膈肌麻痹(HDP)的风险。为了降低 HDP 的风险,有人建议在臂丛神经分割水平进行上躯干阻滞 (UTB):我们假设UTB的HDP发生率低于ISB,同时能在肩关节镜手术后提供充分的镇痛:随机对照试验:一家三级教学医院:70名接受关节镜肩袖修复手术的患者,年龄在20至80岁之间:主要结果指标:主要结果:主要结果是完全HDP的发生率,通过超声评估膈肌偏移,定义为下降至基线的25%或更少,或发生矛盾运动。术后肺功能变化、疼痛评分、阿片类药物用量和疼痛相关结果为次要结果:结果:UTB 组的完全 HDP 发生率明显低于 ISB 组[5.9%(2/34)vs 41.7%(15/36);绝对差异,35.8%;95% 置信区间 (CI),17.8% 至 53.7%;P 结论:UTB 与完全 HDP 发生率较低相关:UTB与ISB相比,在肩关节镜手术中HDP发生率较低,同时镇痛效果极佳:试验注册:韩国临床试验注册中心 (https://cris.nih.go.kr) 识别码:KCT0007002.Irb number:忠南大学医院机构审查委员会编号:2021-12-069。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diaphragm-sparing efficacy of subparaneural upper trunk block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Background: Inter-scalene block (ISB) is associated with an inevitable risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (HDP). To reduce the risk of HDP, an upper trunk block (UTB) has been proposed at the brachial plexus division level.

Objective: We hypothesised that UTB would be associated with a lower incidence of HDP than ISB while providing sufficient analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: A tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients: Seventy patients aged 20 to 80 years undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Intervention: Ultrasound-guided ISB or UTB was performed with 5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of complete HDP, assessed by diaphragm excursion using ultrasound, defined as a decrease to 25% or less of baseline or occurrence of paradoxical movement. Postoperative pulmonary function change, pain scores, opioid consumption and pain-related outcomes were the secondary outcomes.

Results: The UTB group had a significantly lower incidence of complete HDP than the ISB group [5.9% (2/34) vs. 41.7% (15/36); absolute difference, 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 17.8 to 53.7%; P  < 0.001]. The postblockade decline in pulmonary function was more pronounced in the ISB group than that in the UTB group. The pain score at 1 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups (ISB vs. UTB group: median 0 vs. 1; median difference, -1; 95% CI, -2 to 0.5). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: UTB was associated with a lower incidence of HDP compared with ISB while providing excellent analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) identifier: KCT0007002.

Irb number: Chungnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board No. 2021-12-069.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信