预防麻风病的性传播:方法的系统回顾和定性证据综述。

Infectious diseases (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2364801
Sara Paparini, Isabelle Whelan, Chikondi Mwendera, Rosalie Hayes, Ismael Maatouk, Rosamund Lewis, Mateo Prochazka Nunez, Antons Mozalevskis, Teodora Wi, Chloe Orkin
{"title":"预防麻风病的性传播:方法的系统回顾和定性证据综述。","authors":"Sara Paparini, Isabelle Whelan, Chikondi Mwendera, Rosalie Hayes, Ismael Maatouk, Rosamund Lewis, Mateo Prochazka Nunez, Antons Mozalevskis, Teodora Wi, Chloe Orkin","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2364801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing multi-country mpox outbreak in previously unaffected countries is primarily affecting sexual networks of men who have sex with men. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of recommended preventive interventions. To inform WHO guidelines, a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis were conducted on mpox preventive behavioural interventions to reduce: (i) sexual acquisition; (ii) onward sexual transmission from confirmed/probable cases; and (iii) utility of asymptomatic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and WHO trial databases, grey literature and conferences were searched for English-language primary research published since 1 January 2022. A reviewer team performed screening, data extraction and bias assessment. A qualitative thematic synthesis explored views and experiences of engagement in prevention in individuals at increased risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 16 studies: 1 on contact-tracing, 2 on sexual behaviour, and 13 on asymptomatic testing. Although MPXV was detected in varying proportions of samples (0.17%-6.5%), the testing studies provide insufficient evidence to fully evaluate this strategy. For the qualitative evidence synthesis, four studies evaluated the experiences of most affected communities. Preferences about preventive interventions were shaped by: mpox information; the diversity of sexual practices; accessibility and quality of mpox testing and care; and perceived cost to wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the sexual transmission of mpox remains scarce. Limited qualitative evidence on values and preferences provides insight into factors influencing intervention acceptability. Given global and local inequities in access to vaccines and treatment, further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of additional interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"589-605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of sexual transmission of mpox: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Paparini, Isabelle Whelan, Chikondi Mwendera, Rosalie Hayes, Ismael Maatouk, Rosamund Lewis, Mateo Prochazka Nunez, Antons Mozalevskis, Teodora Wi, Chloe Orkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23744235.2024.2364801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing multi-country mpox outbreak in previously unaffected countries is primarily affecting sexual networks of men who have sex with men. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of recommended preventive interventions. To inform WHO guidelines, a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis were conducted on mpox preventive behavioural interventions to reduce: (i) sexual acquisition; (ii) onward sexual transmission from confirmed/probable cases; and (iii) utility of asymptomatic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and WHO trial databases, grey literature and conferences were searched for English-language primary research published since 1 January 2022. A reviewer team performed screening, data extraction and bias assessment. A qualitative thematic synthesis explored views and experiences of engagement in prevention in individuals at increased risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 16 studies: 1 on contact-tracing, 2 on sexual behaviour, and 13 on asymptomatic testing. Although MPXV was detected in varying proportions of samples (0.17%-6.5%), the testing studies provide insufficient evidence to fully evaluate this strategy. For the qualitative evidence synthesis, four studies evaluated the experiences of most affected communities. Preferences about preventive interventions were shaped by: mpox information; the diversity of sexual practices; accessibility and quality of mpox testing and care; and perceived cost to wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the sexual transmission of mpox remains scarce. Limited qualitative evidence on values and preferences provides insight into factors influencing intervention acceptability. Given global and local inequities in access to vaccines and treatment, further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of additional interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"589-605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229790/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2364801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2364801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前在以前未受影响的国家爆发的多国水痘疫情主要影响了男男性行为者的性网络。建议采取的预防干预措施的有效性需要证据。为了给世卫组织的指南提供信息,我们对水痘预防行为干预措施进行了系统回顾和定性证据综合,以减少:(i) 性传播;(ii) 确诊/疑似病例的转发性传播;(iii) 无症状检测的效用:对 Medline、EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane 和 WHO 试验数据库、灰色文献和会议进行了检索,以了解自 2022 年 1 月 1 日以来发表的英语主要研究。评审小组进行了筛选、数据提取和偏倚评估。定性专题综述探讨了高危人群参与预防的观点和经验:共有 16 项研究:其中 1 项研究涉及接触追踪,2 项研究涉及性行为,13 项研究涉及无症状检测。虽然在不同比例的样本(0.17%-6.5%)中检测到了 MPXV,但检测研究提供的证据不足以对这一策略进行全面评估。在定性证据综合方面,有四项研究对受影响最严重社区的经验进行了评估。以下因素决定了人们对预防性干预措施的偏好:水痘信息;性行为的多样性;水痘检测和护理的可及性和质量;以及对福利成本的感知:有关预防性传播水痘干预措施有效性的证据仍然很少。有关价值观和偏好的定性证据有限,无法深入了解影响干预措施可接受性的因素。鉴于全球和地方在获得疫苗和治疗方面的不平等,需要进一步开展研究,以确定其他干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of sexual transmission of mpox: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of approaches.

Background: The ongoing multi-country mpox outbreak in previously unaffected countries is primarily affecting sexual networks of men who have sex with men. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of recommended preventive interventions. To inform WHO guidelines, a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis were conducted on mpox preventive behavioural interventions to reduce: (i) sexual acquisition; (ii) onward sexual transmission from confirmed/probable cases; and (iii) utility of asymptomatic testing.

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and WHO trial databases, grey literature and conferences were searched for English-language primary research published since 1 January 2022. A reviewer team performed screening, data extraction and bias assessment. A qualitative thematic synthesis explored views and experiences of engagement in prevention in individuals at increased risk.

Results: There were 16 studies: 1 on contact-tracing, 2 on sexual behaviour, and 13 on asymptomatic testing. Although MPXV was detected in varying proportions of samples (0.17%-6.5%), the testing studies provide insufficient evidence to fully evaluate this strategy. For the qualitative evidence synthesis, four studies evaluated the experiences of most affected communities. Preferences about preventive interventions were shaped by: mpox information; the diversity of sexual practices; accessibility and quality of mpox testing and care; and perceived cost to wellbeing.

Conclusions: Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the sexual transmission of mpox remains scarce. Limited qualitative evidence on values and preferences provides insight into factors influencing intervention acceptability. Given global and local inequities in access to vaccines and treatment, further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of additional interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信