{"title":"在无法感知的高温环境中跑步时,使用空气注入式背包的风扇冷却对年轻人生理和感知压力的影响。","authors":"Masanobu Kajiki, Naoyuki Yamashita, Takaaki Matsumoto","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O<inf>2peak</inf> for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fan cooling with an air-perfused rucksack on physiological and perceptual strains in young men while running in uncompensable hot environment.\",\"authors\":\"Masanobu Kajiki, Naoyuki Yamashita, Takaaki Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O<inf>2peak</inf> for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:降温设备可减少运动前、运动间隙和运动后的热负荷。然而,在气流与跑步速度相当的炎热条件下进行中度/高强度跑步时,这些设备的功效仍不明确。本研究评估了在这种条件下,颈部和上背部通过空气灌注背包的风扇冷却所产生的生理和知觉反应:方法:10 名年轻男子在 35 °C、50% 相对湿度条件下,以 60% V 直流热量峰值跑步 30 分钟,随机顺序分别穿戴(FAN)和不穿戴(CON)带头罩的空气灌注背包。两种条件下均提供与跑步速度相同的逆风。风扇冷却试验包括上背部和颈部风扇冷却,气流通过背包两侧的两个风扇以每秒 4-5 米的速度流动。对直肠和皮肤温度、全身热感、热舒适度和体重变化进行了测量:结果:在整个运动过程中,风扇组的上背部皮肤温度和热感觉明显低于对照组,而风扇组在 15-40 分钟时的热舒适度明显高于对照组(所有 P 均小于 0.05)。在 30 分钟的跑步过程中,FAN 的心率升高比 CON 的心率升高要低(P≤0.05)。在直肠温度和平均皮肤温度以及身体总质量损失方面,两项试验之间没有观察到明显差异:这些结果表明,在无法补偿的炎热条件下迎风跑步时,对上背部和颈部进行额外的风扇冷却在生理上的益处有限。然而,使用空气灌注背包可部分改善全身热感和舒适度。
Effects of fan cooling with an air-perfused rucksack on physiological and perceptual strains in young men while running in uncompensable hot environment.
Background: Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.
Methods: Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O2peak for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.
Results: Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.
Conclusions: These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.