Grant D Senyei, Ala Eddin S Sagar, Brian Tran, Archan Shah, Russell Miller, Niral Patel, Keriann Van Nostrand, Roberto F Casal, George Z Cheng
{"title":"在 RP-EBUS 和支气管镜检查过程中增量应用呼气末正压评估气胸(I-APPEAR)。","authors":"Grant D Senyei, Ala Eddin S Sagar, Brian Tran, Archan Shah, Russell Miller, Niral Patel, Keriann Van Nostrand, Roberto F Casal, George Z Cheng","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CT-to-body divergence-described as the difference between preprocedural CT scans and intraprocedural lung architecture-is a significant barrier to improving diagnostic yield during navigational bronchoscopy. A major proposed contributor to CT-to-body divergence is the development of atelectasis, which can confound visualization of peripheral lung lesions via radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS). High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilatory strategies have been used to decrease atelectasis, allowing the lesion to re-APPEAR on intraprocedure imaging. However, standardized PEEP levels may not be appropriate for all patients due to hemodynamic and ventilatory impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, prospective observational study in which patients were imaged with RP-EBUS under general anesthesia to determine if subsegmental atelectasis would resolve as incremental increases in PEEP were applied. Resolution of atelectasis was based on the transition from a non-aerated pattern to an aerated appearance on RP-EBUS. RP-EBUS images were reviewed by 3 experienced operators to determine correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients underwent RP-EBUS examination following navigational bronchoscopy. Thirty-seven patients underwent incremental PEEP application and subsequent RP-EBUS imaging. Atelectasis was determined to have resolved in 33 patients (88.2%) following increased PEEP. The intraclass correlation coefficient between reviewers was 0.76. A recruitment maneuver was performed in 7 (16.3%) patients after atelectasis persisted at maximal PEEP. Atelectasis was not identified in the examined subsegments in 6 (10.8%) patients despite zero PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RP-EBUS is an effective tool to monitor what pressure atelectasis within a lung segment has resolved with increasing levels of PEEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental Application of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure for the Evaluation of Atelectasis During RP-EBUS and Bronchoscopy (I-APPEAR).\",\"authors\":\"Grant D Senyei, Ala Eddin S Sagar, Brian Tran, Archan Shah, Russell Miller, Niral Patel, Keriann Van Nostrand, Roberto F Casal, George Z Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CT-to-body divergence-described as the difference between preprocedural CT scans and intraprocedural lung architecture-is a significant barrier to improving diagnostic yield during navigational bronchoscopy. A major proposed contributor to CT-to-body divergence is the development of atelectasis, which can confound visualization of peripheral lung lesions via radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS). High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilatory strategies have been used to decrease atelectasis, allowing the lesion to re-APPEAR on intraprocedure imaging. However, standardized PEEP levels may not be appropriate for all patients due to hemodynamic and ventilatory impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, prospective observational study in which patients were imaged with RP-EBUS under general anesthesia to determine if subsegmental atelectasis would resolve as incremental increases in PEEP were applied. Resolution of atelectasis was based on the transition from a non-aerated pattern to an aerated appearance on RP-EBUS. RP-EBUS images were reviewed by 3 experienced operators to determine correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients underwent RP-EBUS examination following navigational bronchoscopy. Thirty-seven patients underwent incremental PEEP application and subsequent RP-EBUS imaging. Atelectasis was determined to have resolved in 33 patients (88.2%) following increased PEEP. The intraclass correlation coefficient between reviewers was 0.76. A recruitment maneuver was performed in 7 (16.3%) patients after atelectasis persisted at maximal PEEP. Atelectasis was not identified in the examined subsegments in 6 (10.8%) patients despite zero PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RP-EBUS is an effective tool to monitor what pressure atelectasis within a lung segment has resolved with increasing levels of PEEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:CT 与机体之间的差异--即术前 CT 扫描与术中肺部结构之间的差异--是提高导航支气管镜检查诊断率的一大障碍。造成 CT 与机体间差异的一个主要原因是发生了肺不张,这会影响通过径向探头支气管内超声(RP-EBUS)观察周围肺部病变。高呼气末正压(PEEP)通气策略已被用于减少肺不张,从而使病变在术中成像时重新显影。然而,由于血流动力学和通气的影响,标准化的 PEEP 水平可能并不适合所有患者:我们进行了一项多中心、前瞻性观察研究,对患者进行全身麻醉下的 RP-EBUS 造影,以确定随着 PEEP 的逐步增加,节段下无动脉导管畸形是否会缓解。肺不张的缓解是基于 RP-EBUS 上从不透气模式到透气外观的转变。RP-EBUS 图像由 3 位经验丰富的操作员审查,以确定相关性:43名患者在接受导航支气管镜检查后接受了RP-EBUS检查。37 名患者接受了增量 PEEP 应用和随后的 RP-EBUS 成像检查。有 33 名患者(88.2%)在增加 PEEP 后确定气道栓塞已得到缓解。审查人员之间的类内相关系数为 0.76。有 7 名患者(16.3%)在最大 PEEP 时仍存在气胸,因此进行了吸气操作。尽管 PEEP 为零,但仍有 6 例(10.8%)患者的检查分段未发现气胸:结论:RP-EBUS 是一种有效的工具,可用于监测肺段内哪种压力的偏气已随着 PEEP 的增加而消除。
Incremental Application of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure for the Evaluation of Atelectasis During RP-EBUS and Bronchoscopy (I-APPEAR).
Background: CT-to-body divergence-described as the difference between preprocedural CT scans and intraprocedural lung architecture-is a significant barrier to improving diagnostic yield during navigational bronchoscopy. A major proposed contributor to CT-to-body divergence is the development of atelectasis, which can confound visualization of peripheral lung lesions via radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS). High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilatory strategies have been used to decrease atelectasis, allowing the lesion to re-APPEAR on intraprocedure imaging. However, standardized PEEP levels may not be appropriate for all patients due to hemodynamic and ventilatory impacts.
Methods: We performed a multicenter, prospective observational study in which patients were imaged with RP-EBUS under general anesthesia to determine if subsegmental atelectasis would resolve as incremental increases in PEEP were applied. Resolution of atelectasis was based on the transition from a non-aerated pattern to an aerated appearance on RP-EBUS. RP-EBUS images were reviewed by 3 experienced operators to determine correlation.
Results: Forty-three patients underwent RP-EBUS examination following navigational bronchoscopy. Thirty-seven patients underwent incremental PEEP application and subsequent RP-EBUS imaging. Atelectasis was determined to have resolved in 33 patients (88.2%) following increased PEEP. The intraclass correlation coefficient between reviewers was 0.76. A recruitment maneuver was performed in 7 (16.3%) patients after atelectasis persisted at maximal PEEP. Atelectasis was not identified in the examined subsegments in 6 (10.8%) patients despite zero PEEP.
Conclusion: RP-EBUS is an effective tool to monitor what pressure atelectasis within a lung segment has resolved with increasing levels of PEEP.