急诊护理环境中注册护士使用辅助疗法的决定因素。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Complementary Medicine Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1159/000539883
Arin M VanWormer, Kelly Buchholtz, Jeffrey J VanWormer
{"title":"急诊护理环境中注册护士使用辅助疗法的决定因素。","authors":"Arin M VanWormer, Kelly Buchholtz, Jeffrey J VanWormer","doi":"10.1159/000539883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alternatives are needed to traditional care to help patients manage pain and discomfort in acute care settings. Complementary and integrative therapies (CITs) involve alternative medicine practices that are assimilated into conventional care. The degree to which registered nurses (RNs) use CIT in acute care settings, however, remains unclear. This study identified determinants of CIT use among RNs in a US hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Nurse managers emailed invitations to study-eligible RNs, and the survey captured recent CIT use, as well as sociodemographic and training/experience exposures. Participants were employees in a western Wisconsin hospital. All participants were RNs at the target hospital and worked in acute care. CIT use was assessed with a single item that asked respondents to indicate which of 25 common CIT methods they have used or offered to patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 164 respondents from 463 invited RNs (35% response rate). In the past 6 months, 79% reported the use of CIT with their patients. The most common practices were relaxed breathing, music therapy, essential oils, massage, and aromatherapy. The final multivariable logistic regression model found that RNs with ≥14 years of clinical experience had 72% lower odds of CIT use relative to those with 0-2 years of experience (p = 0.023). In addition, RNs who were married had 76% lower odds of CIT use relative to those not married (p = 0.017). Other factors such as age, gender, specialized CIT education, or nursing degree type had limited influence on CIT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CIT was generally high in this sample of hospital RNs, particularly among those who were not married and who were trained more recently. Future research should examine RN-led CIT effectiveness on patient outcomes in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Complementary Therapy Use among Registered Nurses in an Acute Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Arin M VanWormer, Kelly Buchholtz, Jeffrey J VanWormer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alternatives are needed to traditional care to help patients manage pain and discomfort in acute care settings. Complementary and integrative therapies (CITs) involve alternative medicine practices that are assimilated into conventional care. The degree to which registered nurses (RNs) use CIT in acute care settings, however, remains unclear. This study identified determinants of CIT use among RNs in a US hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Nurse managers emailed invitations to study-eligible RNs, and the survey captured recent CIT use, as well as sociodemographic and training/experience exposures. Participants were employees in a western Wisconsin hospital. All participants were RNs at the target hospital and worked in acute care. CIT use was assessed with a single item that asked respondents to indicate which of 25 common CIT methods they have used or offered to patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 164 respondents from 463 invited RNs (35% response rate). In the past 6 months, 79% reported the use of CIT with their patients. The most common practices were relaxed breathing, music therapy, essential oils, massage, and aromatherapy. The final multivariable logistic regression model found that RNs with ≥14 years of clinical experience had 72% lower odds of CIT use relative to those with 0-2 years of experience (p = 0.023). In addition, RNs who were married had 76% lower odds of CIT use relative to those not married (p = 0.017). Other factors such as age, gender, specialized CIT education, or nursing degree type had limited influence on CIT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CIT was generally high in this sample of hospital RNs, particularly among those who were not married and who were trained more recently. Future research should examine RN-led CIT effectiveness on patient outcomes in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Medicine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在急诊护理环境中,需要有替代传统护理的方法来帮助患者控制疼痛和不适。补充和综合疗法(CIT)涉及将替代疗法融入到传统护理中。然而,注册护士(RNs)在急症护理环境中使用 CIT 的程度仍不清楚。本研究确定了美国一家医院的注册护士使用 CIT 的决定因素:方法:进行了一项横断面在线调查。护士长通过电子邮件向符合研究条件的护士发出邀请,调查内容包括近期 CIT 的使用情况以及社会人口学和培训/经验接触情况。参与者为威斯康星州西部一家医院的员工。所有参与者都是目标医院的护士,从事急症护理工作。对 CIT 使用情况的评估只有一个项目,即要求受访者指出他们曾使用过或向病人提供过 25 种常见 CIT 方法中的哪一种:463 名受邀的护士中有 164 人做出了回答(回答率为 35%)。在过去六个月中,79% 的受访者表示曾对病人使用过 CIT。最常见的做法是放松呼吸、音乐疗法、精油、按摩和芳香疗法。最终的多变量逻辑回归模型发现,临床经验≥14 年的护士使用 CIT 的几率比 0-2 年的护士低 72%(P=0.023)。此外,已婚护士使用 CIT 的几率比未婚护士低 76%(P=0.017)。年龄、性别、CIT 专业教育或护理学位类型等其他因素对 CIT 使用的影响有限:结论:在这一医院护士样本中,CIT 的使用率普遍较高,尤其是在未结婚且接受培训时间较短的护士中。未来的研究应考察由护士主导的 CIT 在临床环境中对患者治疗效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of Complementary Therapy Use among Registered Nurses in an Acute Care Setting.

Introduction: Alternatives are needed to traditional care to help patients manage pain and discomfort in acute care settings. Complementary and integrative therapies (CITs) involve alternative medicine practices that are assimilated into conventional care. The degree to which registered nurses (RNs) use CIT in acute care settings, however, remains unclear. This study identified determinants of CIT use among RNs in a US hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Nurse managers emailed invitations to study-eligible RNs, and the survey captured recent CIT use, as well as sociodemographic and training/experience exposures. Participants were employees in a western Wisconsin hospital. All participants were RNs at the target hospital and worked in acute care. CIT use was assessed with a single item that asked respondents to indicate which of 25 common CIT methods they have used or offered to patients.

Results: There were 164 respondents from 463 invited RNs (35% response rate). In the past 6 months, 79% reported the use of CIT with their patients. The most common practices were relaxed breathing, music therapy, essential oils, massage, and aromatherapy. The final multivariable logistic regression model found that RNs with ≥14 years of clinical experience had 72% lower odds of CIT use relative to those with 0-2 years of experience (p = 0.023). In addition, RNs who were married had 76% lower odds of CIT use relative to those not married (p = 0.017). Other factors such as age, gender, specialized CIT education, or nursing degree type had limited influence on CIT use.

Conclusion: The use of CIT was generally high in this sample of hospital RNs, particularly among those who were not married and who were trained more recently. Future research should examine RN-led CIT effectiveness on patient outcomes in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信