艾曲波帕加迪阿色林与艾曲波帕治疗 ITP 患者:一项多中心、随机、开放标签的 2 期试验。

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1182/blood.2024025067
Lu Sun, Xiaoyang Huang, Juan Wang, Chenglu Yuan, Hongyu Zhao, Daqi Li, Ruirong Xu, Yan Wang, Ping Qin, Yan Shi, Jun Peng, Ming Hou, Yu Hou
{"title":"艾曲波帕加迪阿色林与艾曲波帕治疗 ITP 患者:一项多中心、随机、开放标签的 2 期试验。","authors":"Lu Sun, Xiaoyang Huang, Juan Wang, Chenglu Yuan, Hongyu Zhao, Daqi Li, Ruirong Xu, Yan Wang, Ping Qin, Yan Shi, Jun Peng, Ming Hou, Yu Hou","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag alone in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who were previously unresponsive to 14 days of eltrombopag treatment at the full dose. Recruited patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either eltrombopag plus diacerein (n = 50) or eltrombopag monotherapy (n = 52). Overall response rate, defined as a platelet count of ≥30 × 109/L, at least doubling of the baseline platelet count, and no bleeding, was reached in 44% of patients in the eltrombopag plus diacerein group compared with 13% in the eltrombopag group at day 15 (P = .0009), and reached in 42% of patients in the combination group compared with 12% in the monotherapy group at day 28 (P = .0006). The addition of diacerein to eltrombopag also led to a longer duration of response (P = .0004). The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events were respiratory infection and gastrointestinal reactions in the combination group, and fatigue and respiratory infection in the eltrombopag group. In conclusion, eltrombopag plus diacerein was well tolerated, and induced higher overall response rates and longer duration of response than eltrombopag alone, offering a rejuvenating salvage therapy for patients with ITP unresponsive to 14 days of full dosage eltrombopag. Our work has the potential to enhance the care of patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, reducing the need for rapid transitions to less-preferable therapies. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04917679.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"1791-1799"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag in patients with ITP: a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Sun, Xiaoyang Huang, Juan Wang, Chenglu Yuan, Hongyu Zhao, Daqi Li, Ruirong Xu, Yan Wang, Ping Qin, Yan Shi, Jun Peng, Ming Hou, Yu Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/blood.2024025067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag alone in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who were previously unresponsive to 14 days of eltrombopag treatment at the full dose. Recruited patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either eltrombopag plus diacerein (n = 50) or eltrombopag monotherapy (n = 52). Overall response rate, defined as a platelet count of ≥30 × 109/L, at least doubling of the baseline platelet count, and no bleeding, was reached in 44% of patients in the eltrombopag plus diacerein group compared with 13% in the eltrombopag group at day 15 (P = .0009), and reached in 42% of patients in the combination group compared with 12% in the monotherapy group at day 28 (P = .0006). The addition of diacerein to eltrombopag also led to a longer duration of response (P = .0004). The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events were respiratory infection and gastrointestinal reactions in the combination group, and fatigue and respiratory infection in the eltrombopag group. In conclusion, eltrombopag plus diacerein was well tolerated, and induced higher overall response rates and longer duration of response than eltrombopag alone, offering a rejuvenating salvage therapy for patients with ITP unresponsive to 14 days of full dosage eltrombopag. Our work has the potential to enhance the care of patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, reducing the need for rapid transitions to less-preferable therapies. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04917679.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1791-1799\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在比较艾曲波帕加迪阿色林与单用艾曲波帕治疗原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者之前对艾曲波帕14天全剂量治疗无反应。招募的患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受艾曲波帕加迪阿塞林(50人)或艾曲波帕单药治疗(52人)。艾曲波帕加迪阿色林治疗组有44%的患者在第15天达到了总体应答率,而艾曲波帕治疗组只有13%的患者达到了总体应答率(P = 0.0009);在第28天,艾曲波帕加迪阿色林治疗组有42%的患者达到了总体应答率,而艾曲波帕单一治疗组只有12%的患者达到了总体应答率(P = 0.0006)。在艾曲波帕中添加迪卡瑞林还能延长反应持续时间(P = 0.0004)。治疗中最常见的两种不良反应是联合治疗组的呼吸道感染和胃肠道反应,艾曲波帕格治疗组的疲劳和呼吸道感染。总之,艾曲波帕加迪阿塞林的耐受性良好,与单用艾曲波帕相比,艾曲波帕加迪阿塞林的总反应率更高,反应持续时间更长,为对14天全剂量艾曲波帕无反应的ITP患者提供了一种恢复活力的挽救疗法。我们的研究有望加强对接受促血小板生成素受体激动剂治疗的患者的护理,减少患者快速转用不良疗法的需要。这项研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记为 NCT04917679。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag in patients with ITP: a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 trial.

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag plus diacerein vs eltrombopag alone in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who were previously unresponsive to 14 days of eltrombopag treatment at the full dose. Recruited patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either eltrombopag plus diacerein (n = 50) or eltrombopag monotherapy (n = 52). Overall response rate, defined as a platelet count of ≥30 × 109/L, at least doubling of the baseline platelet count, and no bleeding, was reached in 44% of patients in the eltrombopag plus diacerein group compared with 13% in the eltrombopag group at day 15 (P = .0009), and reached in 42% of patients in the combination group compared with 12% in the monotherapy group at day 28 (P = .0006). The addition of diacerein to eltrombopag also led to a longer duration of response (P = .0004). The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events were respiratory infection and gastrointestinal reactions in the combination group, and fatigue and respiratory infection in the eltrombopag group. In conclusion, eltrombopag plus diacerein was well tolerated, and induced higher overall response rates and longer duration of response than eltrombopag alone, offering a rejuvenating salvage therapy for patients with ITP unresponsive to 14 days of full dosage eltrombopag. Our work has the potential to enhance the care of patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, reducing the need for rapid transitions to less-preferable therapies. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04917679.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信