仪器护齿去耦影响头部运动测量精度

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ryan A. Gellner, Mark T. Begonia, Matthew Wood, Lewis Rockwell, Taylor Geiman, Caitlyn Jung, Steve Rowson
{"title":"仪器护齿去耦影响头部运动测量精度","authors":"Ryan A. Gellner,&nbsp;Mark T. Begonia,&nbsp;Matthew Wood,&nbsp;Lewis Rockwell,&nbsp;Taylor Geiman,&nbsp;Caitlyn Jung,&nbsp;Steve Rowson","doi":"10.1007/s10439-024-03550-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many recent studies have used boil-and-bite style instrumented mouthguards to measure head kinematics during impact in sports. Instrumented mouthguards promise greater accuracy than their predecessors because of their superior ability to couple directly to the skull. These mouthguards have been validated in the lab and on the field, but little is known about the effects of decoupling during impact. Decoupling can occur for various reasons, such as poor initial fit, wear-and-tear, or excessive impact forces. To understand how decoupling influences measured kinematic error, we fit a boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguard to a 3D-printed dentition mounted to a National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) headform. We also instrumented the headform with linear accelerometers and angular rate sensors at its center of gravity (CG). We performed a series of pendulum impact tests, varying impactor face and impact direction. We measured linear acceleration and angular velocity, and we calculated angular acceleration from the mouthguard and the headform CG. We created decoupling conditions by varying the gap between the lower jaw and the bottom face of the mouthguard. We tested three gap conditions: 0 mm (control), 1.6 mm, and 4.8 mm. Mouthguard measurements were transformed to the CG and compared to the reference measurements. We found that gap condition, impact duration, and impact direction significantly influenced mouthguard measurement error. Error was higher for larger gaps and in frontal (front and front boss) conditions. Higher errors were also found in padded conditions, but the mouthguards did not collect all rigid impacts due to inherent limitations. We present characteristic decoupling time history curves for each kinematic measurement. Exemplary frequency spectra indicating characteristic decoupling frequencies are also described. Researchers using boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguards should be aware of their limitations when interpreting results and should seek to address decoupling through advanced post-processing techniques when possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"52 10","pages":"2854 - 2871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instrumented Mouthguard Decoupling Affects Measured Head Kinematic Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Ryan A. Gellner,&nbsp;Mark T. Begonia,&nbsp;Matthew Wood,&nbsp;Lewis Rockwell,&nbsp;Taylor Geiman,&nbsp;Caitlyn Jung,&nbsp;Steve Rowson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-024-03550-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many recent studies have used boil-and-bite style instrumented mouthguards to measure head kinematics during impact in sports. Instrumented mouthguards promise greater accuracy than their predecessors because of their superior ability to couple directly to the skull. These mouthguards have been validated in the lab and on the field, but little is known about the effects of decoupling during impact. Decoupling can occur for various reasons, such as poor initial fit, wear-and-tear, or excessive impact forces. To understand how decoupling influences measured kinematic error, we fit a boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguard to a 3D-printed dentition mounted to a National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) headform. We also instrumented the headform with linear accelerometers and angular rate sensors at its center of gravity (CG). We performed a series of pendulum impact tests, varying impactor face and impact direction. We measured linear acceleration and angular velocity, and we calculated angular acceleration from the mouthguard and the headform CG. We created decoupling conditions by varying the gap between the lower jaw and the bottom face of the mouthguard. We tested three gap conditions: 0 mm (control), 1.6 mm, and 4.8 mm. Mouthguard measurements were transformed to the CG and compared to the reference measurements. We found that gap condition, impact duration, and impact direction significantly influenced mouthguard measurement error. Error was higher for larger gaps and in frontal (front and front boss) conditions. Higher errors were also found in padded conditions, but the mouthguards did not collect all rigid impacts due to inherent limitations. We present characteristic decoupling time history curves for each kinematic measurement. Exemplary frequency spectra indicating characteristic decoupling frequencies are also described. Researchers using boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguards should be aware of their limitations when interpreting results and should seek to address decoupling through advanced post-processing techniques when possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"2854 - 2871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-024-03550-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-024-03550-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的许多研究都使用沸腾咬合式仪器护齿来测量运动中撞击时的头部运动学。仪器式护齿因其直接与头骨耦合的能力更强,因此比其前代产品具有更高的准确性。这些护齿已在实验室和赛场上得到验证,但人们对撞击时脱钩的影响知之甚少。发生脱钩的原因有很多,例如初始配合不佳、磨损或冲击力过大。为了了解脱钩如何影响测量的运动学误差,我们将沸腾咬合仪器护齿与安装在国家运动装备标准操作委员会(NOCSAE)头模上的 3D 打印牙模进行了匹配。我们还在头模的重心(CG)处安装了线性加速度计和角速率传感器。我们进行了一系列摆锤冲击测试,改变了冲击面和冲击方向。我们测量了线性加速度和角速度,并计算了护齿和头模重心的角加速度。我们通过改变下颌与护齿底面之间的间隙来创造去耦条件。我们测试了三种间隙条件:0 毫米(对照组)、1.6 毫米和 4.8 毫米。将护齿测量值转换为 CG 值,并与参考测量值进行比较。我们发现,间隙条件、撞击持续时间和撞击方向对护齿测量误差有显著影响。间隙越大和正面(前方和前方老板)条件下的误差越大。在有衬垫的情况下误差也更大,但由于固有的限制,护齿并不能收集所有的刚性撞击。我们展示了每种运动学测量的特征解耦时间历史曲线。我们还描述了显示特征解耦频率的示例频谱。使用沸腾咬合仪器护齿的研究人员在解释结果时应注意其局限性,并应尽可能通过先进的后处理技术来解决解耦问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Instrumented Mouthguard Decoupling Affects Measured Head Kinematic Accuracy

Instrumented Mouthguard Decoupling Affects Measured Head Kinematic Accuracy

Many recent studies have used boil-and-bite style instrumented mouthguards to measure head kinematics during impact in sports. Instrumented mouthguards promise greater accuracy than their predecessors because of their superior ability to couple directly to the skull. These mouthguards have been validated in the lab and on the field, but little is known about the effects of decoupling during impact. Decoupling can occur for various reasons, such as poor initial fit, wear-and-tear, or excessive impact forces. To understand how decoupling influences measured kinematic error, we fit a boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguard to a 3D-printed dentition mounted to a National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) headform. We also instrumented the headform with linear accelerometers and angular rate sensors at its center of gravity (CG). We performed a series of pendulum impact tests, varying impactor face and impact direction. We measured linear acceleration and angular velocity, and we calculated angular acceleration from the mouthguard and the headform CG. We created decoupling conditions by varying the gap between the lower jaw and the bottom face of the mouthguard. We tested three gap conditions: 0 mm (control), 1.6 mm, and 4.8 mm. Mouthguard measurements were transformed to the CG and compared to the reference measurements. We found that gap condition, impact duration, and impact direction significantly influenced mouthguard measurement error. Error was higher for larger gaps and in frontal (front and front boss) conditions. Higher errors were also found in padded conditions, but the mouthguards did not collect all rigid impacts due to inherent limitations. We present characteristic decoupling time history curves for each kinematic measurement. Exemplary frequency spectra indicating characteristic decoupling frequencies are also described. Researchers using boil-and-bite instrumented mouthguards should be aware of their limitations when interpreting results and should seek to address decoupling through advanced post-processing techniques when possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信