为什么我们需要脑科学和行为科学领域的神经多样性?

Brain-X Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/brx2.70
Yinghui Xia, Peng Wang, Jonathan Vincent
{"title":"为什么我们需要脑科学和行为科学领域的神经多样性?","authors":"Yinghui Xia,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Jonathan Vincent","doi":"10.1002/brx2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we present the case for the adoption of a neurodiversity paradigm as an essential framework within the brain and behavioral sciences. We challenge the deficit-focused medical model by advocating for the recognition of neurocognitive variances—including autism, ADHD, dyslexia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder—as natural representations of human diversity. We call for a shift in research and practice towards valuing neurodivergent individuals' unique strengths and contributions and promoting inclusivity and empathy. In critiquing the tendency to pathologize cognitive differences, we argue for a re-evaluation of therapeutic goals to reflect a more nuanced understanding of neurodiversity. Highlighting the socio-ethical implications of therapy-focused research, we urge an appreciation of the potential for innovation and problem-solving that neurodivergent individuals bring to society. The conclusion is a call to action for an integrated approach in research, policy, and societal attitudes that affirms neurodiversity, fostering an environment in which all forms of cognitive functioning are celebrated as part of human advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94303,"journal":{"name":"Brain-X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brx2.70","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we need neurodiversity in brain and behavioral sciences\",\"authors\":\"Yinghui Xia,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Jonathan Vincent\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brx2.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this article, we present the case for the adoption of a neurodiversity paradigm as an essential framework within the brain and behavioral sciences. We challenge the deficit-focused medical model by advocating for the recognition of neurocognitive variances—including autism, ADHD, dyslexia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder—as natural representations of human diversity. We call for a shift in research and practice towards valuing neurodivergent individuals' unique strengths and contributions and promoting inclusivity and empathy. In critiquing the tendency to pathologize cognitive differences, we argue for a re-evaluation of therapeutic goals to reflect a more nuanced understanding of neurodiversity. Highlighting the socio-ethical implications of therapy-focused research, we urge an appreciation of the potential for innovation and problem-solving that neurodivergent individuals bring to society. The conclusion is a call to action for an integrated approach in research, policy, and societal attitudes that affirms neurodiversity, fostering an environment in which all forms of cognitive functioning are celebrated as part of human advancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain-X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brx2.70\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain-X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brx2.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brx2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们提出了采用神经多样性范式作为大脑和行为科学基本框架的理由。我们主张承认神经认知差异--包括自闭症、多动症、阅读障碍、精神分裂症和躁狂症--是人类多样性的自然表征,以此挑战以缺陷为重点的医学模式。我们呼吁在研究和实践中转变观念,重视神经变异个体的独特优势和贡献,促进包容性和同理心。在批评将认知差异病理化的倾向时,我们主张重新评估治疗目标,以反映对神经多样性更细致入微的理解。在强调以治疗为重点的研究对社会伦理的影响时,我们敦促人们重视神经变异个体为社会带来的创新和解决问题的潜力。最后,我们呼吁采取行动,在研究、政策和社会态度方面采取综合方法,肯定神经多样性,营造一种环境,使各种形式的认知功能都能作为人类进步的一部分而受到赞美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Why we need neurodiversity in brain and behavioral sciences

Why we need neurodiversity in brain and behavioral sciences

In this article, we present the case for the adoption of a neurodiversity paradigm as an essential framework within the brain and behavioral sciences. We challenge the deficit-focused medical model by advocating for the recognition of neurocognitive variances—including autism, ADHD, dyslexia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder—as natural representations of human diversity. We call for a shift in research and practice towards valuing neurodivergent individuals' unique strengths and contributions and promoting inclusivity and empathy. In critiquing the tendency to pathologize cognitive differences, we argue for a re-evaluation of therapeutic goals to reflect a more nuanced understanding of neurodiversity. Highlighting the socio-ethical implications of therapy-focused research, we urge an appreciation of the potential for innovation and problem-solving that neurodivergent individuals bring to society. The conclusion is a call to action for an integrated approach in research, policy, and societal attitudes that affirms neurodiversity, fostering an environment in which all forms of cognitive functioning are celebrated as part of human advancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信