Christina Kieffer, Navneet Kaur, Jianwei Li, Roser Matamala, Philip A. Fay, Dafeng Hui
{"title":"不同降水处理下开关草对光照和 CO2 的光合响应","authors":"Christina Kieffer, Navneet Kaur, Jianwei Li, Roser Matamala, Philip A. Fay, Dafeng Hui","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO<sub>2</sub> remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO<sub>2</sub> response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO<sub>2</sub> response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (<i>α</i>), convexity (<i>θ</i>), dark respiration (<i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), light compensation point (<i>LCP</i>), and saturated light point (<i>LSP</i>). Specifically, the mean <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>. The +33% treatment had the highest <i>α</i>, and the ambient treatment had lower <i>θ</i> and <i>LCP</i>, higher <i>Rd</i>, and relatively lower <i>LSP</i>. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO<sub>2</sub> response. The ambient treatment had the highest <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>, largest <i>α</i>, and lowest <i>θ</i>, <i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point <i>LCP</i>. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO2 under different precipitation treatments\",\"authors\":\"Christina Kieffer, Navneet Kaur, Jianwei Li, Roser Matamala, Philip A. Fay, Dafeng Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO<sub>2</sub> remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO<sub>2</sub> response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO<sub>2</sub> response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (<i>α</i>), convexity (<i>θ</i>), dark respiration (<i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), light compensation point (<i>LCP</i>), and saturated light point (<i>LSP</i>). Specifically, the mean <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>. The +33% treatment had the highest <i>α</i>, and the ambient treatment had lower <i>θ</i> and <i>LCP</i>, higher <i>Rd</i>, and relatively lower <i>LSP</i>. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO<sub>2</sub> response. The ambient treatment had the highest <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>, largest <i>α</i>, and lowest <i>θ</i>, <i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point <i>LCP</i>. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO2 under different precipitation treatments
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO2 remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO2 concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO2 concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO2 response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO2 response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (α), convexity (θ), dark respiration (Rd), light compensation point (LCP), and saturated light point (LSP). Specifically, the mean Pmax of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher Pmax. The +33% treatment had the highest α, and the ambient treatment had lower θ and LCP, higher Rd, and relatively lower LSP. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO2 response. The ambient treatment had the highest Pmax, largest α, and lowest θ, Rd, and CO2 compensation point LCP. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.