不同降水处理下开关草对光照和 CO2 的光合响应

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Christina Kieffer, Navneet Kaur, Jianwei Li, Roser Matamala, Philip A. Fay, Dafeng Hui
{"title":"不同降水处理下开关草对光照和 CO2 的光合响应","authors":"Christina Kieffer,&nbsp;Navneet Kaur,&nbsp;Jianwei Li,&nbsp;Roser Matamala,&nbsp;Philip A. Fay,&nbsp;Dafeng Hui","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO<sub>2</sub> remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO<sub>2</sub> response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO<sub>2</sub> response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (<i>α</i>), convexity (<i>θ</i>), dark respiration (<i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), light compensation point (<i>LCP</i>), and saturated light point (<i>LSP</i>). Specifically, the mean <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>. The +33% treatment had the highest <i>α</i>, and the ambient treatment had lower <i>θ</i> and <i>LCP</i>, higher <i>Rd</i>, and relatively lower <i>LSP</i>. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO<sub>2</sub> response. The ambient treatment had the highest <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>, largest <i>α</i>, and lowest <i>θ</i>, <i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point <i>LCP</i>. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO2 under different precipitation treatments\",\"authors\":\"Christina Kieffer,&nbsp;Navneet Kaur,&nbsp;Jianwei Li,&nbsp;Roser Matamala,&nbsp;Philip A. Fay,&nbsp;Dafeng Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO<sub>2</sub> remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO<sub>2</sub> response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO<sub>2</sub> response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (<i>α</i>), convexity (<i>θ</i>), dark respiration (<i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>), light compensation point (<i>LCP</i>), and saturated light point (<i>LSP</i>). Specifically, the mean <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>. The +33% treatment had the highest <i>α</i>, and the ambient treatment had lower <i>θ</i> and <i>LCP</i>, higher <i>Rd</i>, and relatively lower <i>LSP</i>. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO<sub>2</sub> response. The ambient treatment had the highest <i>P</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>, largest <i>α</i>, and lowest <i>θ</i>, <i>R</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point <i>LCP</i>. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开关草(Panicum virgatum L.)是一种重要的生物能源作物,对环境压力具有强大的适应能力。然而,我们对降水变化如何影响开关草光合作用及其对光和二氧化碳反应的了解仍然有限。为了填补这一知识空白,我们进行了一次田间降水实验,采用了五种不同的处理,包括-50%、-33%、0%、+33% 和 +50%的环境降水。为了确定叶片光合作用对二氧化碳浓度和光照的响应,我们在 2020 年和 2021 年分别测量了五种降水处理中不同二氧化碳浓度和光照水平下开关草的叶片净光合作用。我们首先利用环境降水处理的测量结果评估了四种光和 CO2 响应模型(即矩形双曲线模型、非矩形双曲线模型、指数模型和修正的矩形双曲线模型)。根据拟合标准,我们选择了非矩形双曲线模型作为最优模型,并将其应用于所有降水处理,同时估算了模型参数。总体而言,该模型很好地拟合了光照和二氧化碳响应曲线的实地测量结果。降水量变化不影响最大净光合速率(Pmax),但影响其他模型参数,包括量子产量(α)、凸度(θ)、暗呼吸(Rd)、光补偿点(LCP)和饱和光点(LSP)。具体而言,五种降水处理的平均最大降水量为 17.6 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1,常温处理的最大降水量往往更高。+33% 处理的 α 最高,而常温处理的 θ 和 LCP 较低,Rd 较高,LSP 相对较低。此外,降水对二氧化碳响应的所有模型参数都有明显影响。常温处理的 Pmax 最高,α 最大,θ、Rd 和二氧化碳补偿点 LCP 最低。总之,这项研究加深了我们对开关草叶片光合作用如何响应各种环境因素的理解,为准确建立开关草生态生理学和生产力模型提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO2 under different precipitation treatments

Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO2 under different precipitation treatments

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a prominent bioenergy crop with robust resilience to environmental stresses. However, our knowledge regarding how precipitation changes affect switchgrass photosynthesis and its responses to light and CO2 remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field precipitation experiment with five different treatments, including −50%, −33%, 0%, +33%, and +50% of ambient precipitation. To determine the responses of leaf photosynthesis to CO2 concentration and light, we measured leaf net photosynthesis of switchgrass under different CO2 concentrations and light levels in 2020 and 2021 for each of the five precipitation treatments. We first evaluated four light and CO2 response models (i.e., rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model, exponential model, and the modified rectangular hyperbola model) using the measurements in the ambient precipitation treatment. Based on the fitting criteria, we selected the nonrectangular hyperbola model as the optimal model and applied it to all precipitation treatments, and estimated model parameters. Overall, the model fit field measurements well for the light and CO2 response curves. Precipitation change did not influence the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax) but influenced other model parameters including quantum yield (α), convexity (θ), dark respiration (Rd), light compensation point (LCP), and saturated light point (LSP). Specifically, the mean Pmax of five precipitation treatments was 17.6 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1, and the ambient treatment tended to have a higher Pmax. The +33% treatment had the highest α, and the ambient treatment had lower θ and LCP, higher Rd, and relatively lower LSP. Furthermore, precipitation significantly influenced all model parameters of CO2 response. The ambient treatment had the highest Pmax, largest α, and lowest θ, Rd, and CO2 compensation point LCP. Overall, this study improved our understanding of how switchgrass leaf photosynthesis responds to diverse environmental factors, providing valuable insights for accurately modeling switchgrass ecophysiology and productivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信