在治疗复杂胸腹主动脉疾病时采用解剖外旁路作为灌注替代方案

Jorge Rey , Christopher Montoya , Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval , Christopher Chow , Stefan Kenel-Pierre , Matthew Sussman , Arash Bornak
{"title":"在治疗复杂胸腹主动脉疾病时采用解剖外旁路作为灌注替代方案","authors":"Jorge Rey ,&nbsp;Christopher Montoya ,&nbsp;Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval ,&nbsp;Christopher Chow ,&nbsp;Stefan Kenel-Pierre ,&nbsp;Matthew Sussman ,&nbsp;Arash Bornak","doi":"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) presents significant challenges for vascular and cardiothoracic surgeons due to the risk of ischemic complications. Various strategies have been implemented over time, including open repair with or without left heart bypass (LHB), endovascular, and hybrid approaches. Here, we explore the application of temporary extra-anatomic bypasses (TEAB) as a technique for complex open TAAA repair when the traditional standard of care is not feasible (i.e. Unavailability of LHB) or indicated (i.e. contraindication for systemic heparinization for LHB).</p></div><div><h3>Case reports</h3><p>Case 1 is an undomiciled 59-year-old male with a chronic type B dissection (CTBD) and degenerative TAAA with failed attempt at endovascular repair at an outside institution. An open repair of the visceral segment was performed with TEAB due to risk of impending rupture, prior failed endovascular repair, and unavailability of cardiac surgery. Additionally, a staged TEVAR was planned for treatment of the thoracic portion of the CTBD in two weeks’ time. The patient experienced sudden chest pain 10 days following the TAAA repair, prompting urgent TEVAR. No complications were observed. Case 2 is a 65-year-old male with a type 2 TAAA who underwent an open repair with the use of TEAB. Technical success was achieved with no complications.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>TAAA repair poses significant challenges <strong>regardless of</strong> the approach selected. However, the use of TEAB has shown promise in ensuring adequate perfusion of vital organs during complex repair when LHB is not an option. Preoperative planning is essential to minimize ischemic time and reduce complications. Studies have shown favorable outcomes with TEAB, however, evidence relies only on small series and case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of TEAB is a valuable technique for safeguarding organ perfusion during open repair of TAAA. While further research and experience are needed, TEAB offers a promising alternative for cases where traditional approaches are not available. Continued exploration and documentation of TEAB in current literature will contribute to optimizing TAAA management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000618/pdfft?md5=b214a4a34317cc49d92433c0855ebd2b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772687824000618-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra-anatomic bypasses as perfusion alternatives in the treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic disease\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Rey ,&nbsp;Christopher Montoya ,&nbsp;Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval ,&nbsp;Christopher Chow ,&nbsp;Stefan Kenel-Pierre ,&nbsp;Matthew Sussman ,&nbsp;Arash Bornak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) presents significant challenges for vascular and cardiothoracic surgeons due to the risk of ischemic complications. Various strategies have been implemented over time, including open repair with or without left heart bypass (LHB), endovascular, and hybrid approaches. Here, we explore the application of temporary extra-anatomic bypasses (TEAB) as a technique for complex open TAAA repair when the traditional standard of care is not feasible (i.e. Unavailability of LHB) or indicated (i.e. contraindication for systemic heparinization for LHB).</p></div><div><h3>Case reports</h3><p>Case 1 is an undomiciled 59-year-old male with a chronic type B dissection (CTBD) and degenerative TAAA with failed attempt at endovascular repair at an outside institution. An open repair of the visceral segment was performed with TEAB due to risk of impending rupture, prior failed endovascular repair, and unavailability of cardiac surgery. Additionally, a staged TEVAR was planned for treatment of the thoracic portion of the CTBD in two weeks’ time. The patient experienced sudden chest pain 10 days following the TAAA repair, prompting urgent TEVAR. No complications were observed. Case 2 is a 65-year-old male with a type 2 TAAA who underwent an open repair with the use of TEAB. Technical success was achieved with no complications.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>TAAA repair poses significant challenges <strong>regardless of</strong> the approach selected. However, the use of TEAB has shown promise in ensuring adequate perfusion of vital organs during complex repair when LHB is not an option. Preoperative planning is essential to minimize ischemic time and reduce complications. Studies have shown favorable outcomes with TEAB, however, evidence relies only on small series and case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of TEAB is a valuable technique for safeguarding organ perfusion during open repair of TAAA. While further research and experience are needed, TEAB offers a promising alternative for cases where traditional approaches are not available. Continued exploration and documentation of TEAB in current literature will contribute to optimizing TAAA management strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000618/pdfft?md5=b214a4a34317cc49d92433c0855ebd2b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772687824000618-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言由于存在缺血性并发症的风险,胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)的治疗给血管和心胸外科医生带来了巨大的挑战。随着时间的推移,人们已经实施了多种策略,包括开放式修补术(带或不带左心搭桥(LHB))、血管内修补术和混合方法。病例报告:病例1是一名59岁的男性,无户籍,患有慢性B型夹层(CTBD)和退行性TAAA,曾在外院尝试血管内修复失败。由于存在即将破裂的风险、之前的血管内修复失败以及无法进行心脏外科手术,因此使用 TEAB 对内脏段进行了开放式修复。此外,还计划在两周后对 CTBD 的胸腔部分进行分期 TEVAR 治疗。患者在 TAAA 修复术后 10 天突然出现胸痛,因此需要紧急进行 TEVAR。未观察到并发症。病例 2 患有 2 型 TAAA 的 65 岁男性患者接受了使用 TEAB 的开放式修复术。讨论无论选择哪种方法,TAAA 修复都会面临巨大的挑战。然而,在无法选择 LHB 的情况下,使用 TEAB 已显示出在复杂修复过程中确保重要器官充分灌注的前景。术前规划对于最大限度地缩短缺血时间和减少并发症至关重要。研究显示 TEAB 有良好的效果,但证据仅依赖于小型系列和病例报告。虽然还需要进一步的研究和经验,但 TEAB 为无法采用传统方法的病例提供了一种很有前景的替代方法。在现有文献中继续探索和记录 TEAB 将有助于优化 TAAA 的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extra-anatomic bypasses as perfusion alternatives in the treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic disease

Introduction

The management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) presents significant challenges for vascular and cardiothoracic surgeons due to the risk of ischemic complications. Various strategies have been implemented over time, including open repair with or without left heart bypass (LHB), endovascular, and hybrid approaches. Here, we explore the application of temporary extra-anatomic bypasses (TEAB) as a technique for complex open TAAA repair when the traditional standard of care is not feasible (i.e. Unavailability of LHB) or indicated (i.e. contraindication for systemic heparinization for LHB).

Case reports

Case 1 is an undomiciled 59-year-old male with a chronic type B dissection (CTBD) and degenerative TAAA with failed attempt at endovascular repair at an outside institution. An open repair of the visceral segment was performed with TEAB due to risk of impending rupture, prior failed endovascular repair, and unavailability of cardiac surgery. Additionally, a staged TEVAR was planned for treatment of the thoracic portion of the CTBD in two weeks’ time. The patient experienced sudden chest pain 10 days following the TAAA repair, prompting urgent TEVAR. No complications were observed. Case 2 is a 65-year-old male with a type 2 TAAA who underwent an open repair with the use of TEAB. Technical success was achieved with no complications.

Discussion

TAAA repair poses significant challenges regardless of the approach selected. However, the use of TEAB has shown promise in ensuring adequate perfusion of vital organs during complex repair when LHB is not an option. Preoperative planning is essential to minimize ischemic time and reduce complications. Studies have shown favorable outcomes with TEAB, however, evidence relies only on small series and case reports.

Conclusion

The use of TEAB is a valuable technique for safeguarding organ perfusion during open repair of TAAA. While further research and experience are needed, TEAB offers a promising alternative for cases where traditional approaches are not available. Continued exploration and documentation of TEAB in current literature will contribute to optimizing TAAA management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信