治疗膝关节骨性关节炎患者的非药物和非手术干预措施:五年更新总览

Ricardo Maia Ferreira , Pedro Nunes Martins , Rui Soles Gonçalves
{"title":"治疗膝关节骨性关节炎患者的非药物和非手术干预措施:五年更新总览","authors":"Ricardo Maia Ferreira ,&nbsp;Pedro Nunes Martins ,&nbsp;Rui Soles Gonçalves","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This umbrella review aimed to summarize (and update) the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Manual and electronic databases were searched, to identify systematic reviews, following the P (knee osteoarthritis) I (non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments) C (pharmacological, surgical, placebo, no intervention, or other non-pharmacological/non-surgical conservative treatments) O (pain, function, quality of life, and other knee-specific measures) model. The quality of evidence was assessed using the R-AMSTAR checklist and GRADE principles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 4086 records, of which 61 met the eligibility criteria. After evaluation with R-AMSTAR, four systematic reviews were excluded, resulting in 57 included systematic reviews, with an overall score of 29.6. The systematic reviews were published between 2018 and 2022 (29.8% in 2022), conducted in 19 countries (52.6% in China), and explored 24 distinct interventions. The systematic reviews encompassed 714 trials (mean of 13 ​± ​7.7 studies per systematic review), and 59,343 participants (mean 1041 ​± ​1002 per systematic review, and 82 ​± ​59.2 per study). The majority of participants were older obese women (61.6 ​± ​4.2 years, 30.2 ​± ​3.6 ​kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on the systematic reviews findings, Diet Therapy, Patient Education, and Resistance Training are strongly supported as core interventions for managing patients with knee osteoarthritis. Aquatic Therapy, Balance Training, Balneology, Dietary Supplements, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, and Tai Ji show moderate support. For other interventions, the evidence quality was low, results were mixed or inconclusive, or there was not sufficient efficacy to support their use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000645/pdfft?md5=58955d3f554e15d9b565dd844021a133&pid=1-s2.0-S2665913124000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions to manage patients with knee osteoarthritis: An umbrella review 5-year update\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Maia Ferreira ,&nbsp;Pedro Nunes Martins ,&nbsp;Rui Soles Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This umbrella review aimed to summarize (and update) the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Manual and electronic databases were searched, to identify systematic reviews, following the P (knee osteoarthritis) I (non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments) C (pharmacological, surgical, placebo, no intervention, or other non-pharmacological/non-surgical conservative treatments) O (pain, function, quality of life, and other knee-specific measures) model. The quality of evidence was assessed using the R-AMSTAR checklist and GRADE principles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 4086 records, of which 61 met the eligibility criteria. After evaluation with R-AMSTAR, four systematic reviews were excluded, resulting in 57 included systematic reviews, with an overall score of 29.6. The systematic reviews were published between 2018 and 2022 (29.8% in 2022), conducted in 19 countries (52.6% in China), and explored 24 distinct interventions. The systematic reviews encompassed 714 trials (mean of 13 ​± ​7.7 studies per systematic review), and 59,343 participants (mean 1041 ​± ​1002 per systematic review, and 82 ​± ​59.2 per study). The majority of participants were older obese women (61.6 ​± ​4.2 years, 30.2 ​± ​3.6 ​kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 70%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on the systematic reviews findings, Diet Therapy, Patient Education, and Resistance Training are strongly supported as core interventions for managing patients with knee osteoarthritis. Aquatic Therapy, Balance Training, Balneology, Dietary Supplements, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, and Tai Ji show moderate support. For other interventions, the evidence quality was low, results were mixed or inconclusive, or there was not sufficient efficacy to support their use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000645/pdfft?md5=58955d3f554e15d9b565dd844021a133&pid=1-s2.0-S2665913124000645-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标本综述旨在总结(和更新)非药物和非手术疗法对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。方法本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。按照 P(膝关节骨性关节炎)I(非药物和非手术疗法)C(药物、手术、安慰剂、无干预或其他非药物/非手术保守疗法)检索人工和电子数据库,以确定系统性综述。O(疼痛、功能、生活质量和其他膝关节特定测量指标)模式。采用R-AMSTAR检查表和GRADE原则对证据质量进行了评估。结果搜索共获得4086条记录,其中61条符合资格标准。经 R-AMSTAR 评估后,排除了 4 篇系统综述,最终纳入了 57 篇系统综述,总得分为 29.6 分。这些系统综述发表于 2018 年至 2022 年(29.8% 发表于 2022 年),在 19 个国家进行(52.6% 在中国),探讨了 24 种不同的干预措施。这些系统综述包含 714 项试验(平均每篇系统综述包含 13 ± 7.7 项研究)和 59343 名参与者(平均每篇系统综述包含 1041 ± 1002 名参与者,每项研究包含 82 ± 59.2 名参与者)。大多数参与者为老年肥胖女性(61.6 ± 4.2 岁,30.2 ± 3.6 kg/m2,分别占 70%)。结论根据系统综述的研究结果,饮食疗法、患者教育和阻力训练作为管理膝关节骨关节炎患者的核心干预措施得到了强有力的支持。水疗、平衡训练、浴疗法、膳食补充剂、体外冲击波疗法和太极获得了中等程度的支持。其他干预措施的证据质量较低、结果不一或不确定,或者没有足够的疗效来支持其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions to manage patients with knee osteoarthritis: An umbrella review 5-year update

Objective

This umbrella review aimed to summarize (and update) the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Manual and electronic databases were searched, to identify systematic reviews, following the P (knee osteoarthritis) I (non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments) C (pharmacological, surgical, placebo, no intervention, or other non-pharmacological/non-surgical conservative treatments) O (pain, function, quality of life, and other knee-specific measures) model. The quality of evidence was assessed using the R-AMSTAR checklist and GRADE principles.

Results

The search yielded 4086 records, of which 61 met the eligibility criteria. After evaluation with R-AMSTAR, four systematic reviews were excluded, resulting in 57 included systematic reviews, with an overall score of 29.6. The systematic reviews were published between 2018 and 2022 (29.8% in 2022), conducted in 19 countries (52.6% in China), and explored 24 distinct interventions. The systematic reviews encompassed 714 trials (mean of 13 ​± ​7.7 studies per systematic review), and 59,343 participants (mean 1041 ​± ​1002 per systematic review, and 82 ​± ​59.2 per study). The majority of participants were older obese women (61.6 ​± ​4.2 years, 30.2 ​± ​3.6 ​kg/m2, 70%, respectively).

Conclusions

Based on the systematic reviews findings, Diet Therapy, Patient Education, and Resistance Training are strongly supported as core interventions for managing patients with knee osteoarthritis. Aquatic Therapy, Balance Training, Balneology, Dietary Supplements, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, and Tai Ji show moderate support. For other interventions, the evidence quality was low, results were mixed or inconclusive, or there was not sufficient efficacy to support their use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信